aka the knight of the lute was possibly identical with
Laurencini of Rome.
Richard Civiol; has put a PDF of the variety of lute lessens 1610 on
the net in which this piece is to be found.
Happy hunting!
Lex van Sante
To get on or off this list see list information at
http
I can't seem to find this tab again, i looked both in Cripps's and
gerbode's sites, but I keep missing it.
In fact, when i think of it, I'm not sure it's dowland's piece...
Any one can help?
Thank you,
Omer
To get on or off this list see list information at
Hi Omar,
This piece isn't by Dowland at all.
Equus Romanus aka the knight of the lute was possibly identical with
Laurencini of Rome.
Richard Civiol; has put a PDF of the variety of lute lessens 1610 on
the net in which this piece is to be found.
Happy hunting!
Lex van Sante
To get
Hello Marco!
CONGRATULATIONS
You seem to have cracked a long-standing mystery in Cinquecento lute music.
Whether Knight of the Lute was one or more persons has nagged me and others
for ages. What a relief to have it solved after all those years. We all
look forward to reading your paper
discovered sources Vincenzo Pinti was 'the most famous the
Knight of the Lute'. You'll find a lot of new informations, unknown
documents about this great lute player in my study.
It's finally clear that the Knight of the Lute was not Laurencinus, but they
were two different persons with very different
