François-Pierre Goy did this catalogue of the manuscript...
Jean-Marie
--
>Check the volume II of "Sources Manuscrites en Tabalature / Luth et théorbe
>(c. 1500 - c. 1800)".
>It is described throughly from p. 28 to 34.
>
>Best,
>
>Jean-Marie
>
>
>--
>
>> And
Check the volume II of "Sources Manuscrites en Tabalature / Luth et théorbe (c.
1500 - c. 1800)".
It is described throughly from p. 28 to 34.
Best,
Jean-Marie
--
> And Horny
> And the first piece is Rugiero by John Johnson for 10 course (!) with
> massive concordances
François Pierre Goy has a lot to say about this manuscript in his maitrise!
Mathias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu [mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] Im Auftrag
von G. C.
Gesendet: Freitag, 6. Oktober 2017 21:56
An: Lute List
Betreff: [LUTE] Re: 40068
And Horny
And the first piece is Rugiero by John Johnson for 10 course (!) with
massive concordances (and a neat script)
[1]http://mss.slweiss.de/index.php?id=1=ms=eng=D-B40068
while the rest is a hopscotch of scribes, epochs and composers.
Found not much info on this one?
G.
Wonderful source ! Thank you Rainer !
More Gaultier, Dufaut, Héard etc...
Best wishes,
Jean-Marie
--
>http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB00020710
>
>Click on the tool icon.
>
>Rainer
>
>
>
>To get on or off this list see list information at
http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB00020710
Click on the tool icon.
Rainer
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
Thank you David ! The voice of wisdom !
Best wishes,
Jean-Marie
--
>Dear Markus,
>
>I'm glad the differences weren't greater!
>
>I've taken mine from either my own measurements
>or the various paper plans issued. Michael
>Fleming did an interesting comparison of
>different
Dear Markus,
I'm glad the differences weren't greater!
I've taken mine from either my own measurements
or the various paper plans issued. Michael
Fleming did an interesting comparison of
different measurements from different
professional makers of the same viols and found
significant
Julien Stryjak replaced the bridge on my archlute (made by him) without
removing the top... And everything works fine now !
Jean-Marie
--
>On 06/10/2017 11:28, r.turov...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Pat O’Brien was an unquestionable authority on musician anatomy, and
>> according to
Am 06.10.2017 um 11:48 schrieb Matthew Daillie:
As for changing bridges, that can require removing the top and changes
to the neck, so not something to be taken lightly.
OK, thank for this correction:
So it is possible, but not that easy ;-).
Best regards
Markus
Best,
Matthew
To get
On 06/10/2017 11:28, r.turov...@gmail.com wrote:
Pat O’Brien was an unquestionable authority on musician anatomy, and according
to him 155mm bridges were fairly ideal.
RT
One man's food is another man's poison.
As for changing bridges, that can require removing the top and changes
to the
The measurements I refer to stem from the new book "Martin und Johann
Christian Hoffmann" by Eszter Fontana, Veit Heller and Klaus Martius,
page 315.
They list up 7 supposedly historic bridges, width of strings (MH =
Martin Hoffmann, JCH = Johann Christian Hoffmann):
MH 9 Nürnberg 169[?]
Pat O’Brien was an unquestionable authority on musician anatomy, and according
to him 155mm bridges were fairly ideal.
RT
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 6, 2017, at 5:08 AM, Jean-Marie Poirier wrote:
>
> According to David Van Edwards's measurements of 26 lutes all over
According to David Van Ewdwards measurements, here are the results for lutes by
the Hoffmanns :
HOFFMANN, JC c. 1754 Horniman Museum
148
HOFFMANN, J C c. 1720 Berlin, No. 129 29
145
HOFFMANN, J C
According to David Van Edwards's measurements of 26 lutes all over the world,
bridges span from 140 to 155 mm, with a average around 143 - 152...
Mine is 155 :-) !
Best,
Jean-Marie
--
>That is a personal preference, Roman, as it must have been at the time
>considering the
Hi Roman,
140mm is definitely in the range of the historic bridges of the Hoffmann
lutes, which have widths between 139 mm (MH 9) and 149 mm (JCH R 7).
The baroque lute of Le Luth Dore also has 140mm, which is - in my very
personal opinion - really good to handle.
But as Matthew said, that is
That is a personal preference, Roman, as it must have been at the time
considering the great variation in historic bridge spans.
Best,
Matthew
> On Oct 6, 2017, at 2:39, Roman Turovsky wrote:
>
> 140mm bridge width? Caveat emptor.
> RT
To get on or off this list see
17 matches
Mail list logo