[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
On Jul 27, 2017, at 3:16 AM, G. C.wrote: > I think we should all be extremely grateful > for the herculean service Wayne has been providing, since 1990 (!) and > even free of charge! Its easy to take it for granted. Here here! Thank you Wayne! Ed Durbrow Saitama, Japan http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch https://soundcloud.com/ed-durbrow http://www9.plala.or.jp/edurbrow/ -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
And yes, my message was stored in the lute archives, so it must have reached the list, but not in the Mail archives. G. On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:01 PM, G. C. <[1]kalei...@gmail.com> wrote: Great Wayne! That works. Thanks a lot! G. On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Wayne <[2]wst...@cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote: > Trying to open the archives today f.ex. doesn't work Hi Göran - If you are trying to access the FTP site at Dartmouth, the college has cut off FTP access for security reasons. So I will have to work out another way to give people access to the lute archives and my tablature writing program. Probably via a web site. Like [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~lute-arc/lute_archives/ which now exists. Wayne To get on or off this list see list information at [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com 2. mailto:wst...@cs.dartmouth.edu 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~lute-arc/lute_archives/ 4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
Great Wayne! That works. Thanks a lot! G. On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Wayne <[1]wst...@cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote: > Trying to open the archives today f.ex. doesn't work Hi Göran - If you are trying to access the FTP site at Dartmouth, the college has cut off FTP access for security reasons. So I will have to work out another way to give people access to the lute archives and my tablature writing program. Probably via a web site. Like [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~lute-arc/lute_archives/ which now exists. Wayne To get on or off this list see list information at [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. mailto:wst...@cs.dartmouth.edu 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~lute-arc/lute_archives/ 3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
Hear! Hear! or is it Here! Here! For some reason messages don't always seem to arrive or get archived but this seems to be just a glitch in the system - not personal dislike of the sender... Best Monica - always one for setting the cat amongst the pigeons... Original Message From: kalei...@gmail.com Date: 26/07/2017 18:16 To: "LutList"<lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Subj: [LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy Well, this list is quirky to say the least. It seems to work 99% of the time, but sometimes messages arrive, sometimes not. Sometimes you can access material, sometimes not. Trying to open the archives today f. ex. doesn't work. The mailing list is another matter. In 2008 I sent this message to the list on the heading: Longest 6c piece, started by Ron. All the other messages are displayed in the mailing list, but not mine. I wonder if the robot didn't like something in the message? As the archives are closed, I cannot check if it was at least recorded there. In spite of a few hicks, I think we should all be extremely grateful for the herculean service Wayne has been providing, since 1990 (!) and even free of charge! Its easy to take it for granted. G. -- Forwarded message -- From: G. Crona <[1]kalei...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Longest 6c piece? To: [2]Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Several years ago, I uploaded the following PDF of the "monster" recercar to Wayne's (sadly) unattributed list: [3]http://tinyurl.com/6bnn5s If you click on the link, you'll download the 18 pages of the piece which is from the Siena ms. (840 Kb) At the time, (rightly or wrongly) I wondered if the piece could be by Paladino, as I felt that some of the themes seemed to associate to themes by him. The piece is also wrongly stored / hidden in the mus_266_french folder. That one'll keep you busy for a while... ;) G. -- References 1. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com 2. mailto:Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 3. http://tinyurl.com/6bnn5s To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
Well, this list is quirky to say the least. It seems to work 99% of the time, but sometimes messages arrive, sometimes not. Sometimes you can access material, sometimes not. Trying to open the archives today f.ex. doesn't work. The mailing list is another matter. In 2008 I sent this message to the list on the heading: Longest 6c piece, started by Ron. All the other messages are displayed in the mailing list, but not mine. I wonder if the robot didn't like something in the message? As the archives are closed, I cannot check if it was at least recorded there. In spite of a few hicks, I think we should all be extremely grateful for the herculean service Wayne has been providing, since 1990 (!) and even free of charge! Its easy to take it for granted. G. -- Forwarded message -- From: G. Crona <[1]kalei...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:45 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Longest 6c piece? To: [2]Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Several years ago, I uploaded the following PDF of the "monster" recercar to Wayne's (sadly) unattributed list: [3]http://tinyurl.com/6bnn5s If you click on the link, you'll download the 18 pages of the piece which is from the Siena ms. (840 Kb) At the time, (rightly or wrongly) I wondered if the piece could be by Paladino, as I felt that some of the themes seemed to associate to themes by him. The piece is also wrongly stored / hidden in the mus_266_french folder. That one'll keep you busy for a while... ;) G. -- References 1. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com 2. mailto:Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu 3. http://tinyurl.com/6bnn5s To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
Amen. A. John Mardinly, Ph.D., P.E. Classical Guitarist/Lutenist > On Jul 26, 2017, at 5:42 AM, mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: > > We have hundreds of words in English which are spelt in the same way > but have different meanings depending on the context and we usually > manage to understand what is intended without diacritical marks. > This list is conducted in English - is it helpful to insist on sending > messages which are difficult to decipher for everyone on it regardless > of what their mother tongue might be? > Monica > > > Original Message > From: r...@mh-freiburg.de > Date: 26/07/2017 12:19 > To: <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> > Cc: "LutList"<lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> > Subj: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy > > > Am Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2017 11:26 CEST, "mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk" > <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> schrieb: > > <...> >> surely it is not necessary. > > That's pretty much an anglocentric, snobbish statement. > Those little speckles aren't just arabesque ornamental decoration, they > carry a meaning. > It really makes a difference if you write someone is from "Düsseldorf" > (village near the river > Düssel) or "Dusseldorf" (village of the morons). > At least attempting to use propper spelling seems to be a laudeable > goal, even outside > "scholarly dissertations". > > Of course, the right thing to do would be to fix that small bugglet in > the ML software. > I'd be more than happy to assist. > > Cheers, RalfD > > > > > > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.cs.dartmouth.edu_-7Ewbc_lute-2Dadmin_index.html=DwIFaQ=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ=VLPJ8OE-c_C6joGeE1ftlvxMmQPq9N6mpKZONBRt90E=ZbaEdErXsdhb6MReCk80wc-r58ituDrdfo0qz1miZN8=PtSVw1kpxRccn9AVgLo9ymyxBbKvzck6KJK4mGxCiwE= >
[LUTE] Re: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy
We have hundreds of words in English which are spelt in the same way but have different meanings depending on the context and we usually manage to understand what is intended without diacritical marks. This list is conducted in English - is it helpful to insist on sending messages which are difficult to decipher for everyone on it regardless of what their mother tongue might be? Monica Original Message From: r...@mh-freiburg.de Date: 26/07/2017 12:19 To: <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> Cc: "LutList"<lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Subj: Mailing List Software [was] Re: Sermisy Am Mittwoch, 26. Juli 2017 11:26 CEST, "mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk" <mjlh...@tiscali.co.uk> schrieb: <...> > surely it is not necessary. That's pretty much an anglocentric, snobbish statement. Those little speckles aren't just arabesque ornamental decoration, they carry a meaning. It really makes a difference if you write someone is from "Düsseldorf" (village near the river Düssel) or "Dusseldorf" (village of the morons). At least attempting to use propper spelling seems to be a laudeable goal, even outside "scholarly dissertations". Of course, the right thing to do would be to fix that small bugglet in the ML software. I'd be more than happy to assist. Cheers, RalfD To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html