On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote:
Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@google.com):
What are the requirements/goals around performance and concurrency?
Do you expect this to be a single-threaded thing, or can we handle
some number of concurrent operations? Do
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote:
Quoting Victor Marmol (vmar...@google.com):
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com
wrote:
Quoting Tim Hockin (thoc...@google.com):
What are the requirements/goals around performance
I think most of our usecases have only wanted to know about the parent, but
I can see people wanting to go further. Would it be much different to
support both? I feel like it'll be simpler to support all if we go that
route.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com
I thought we were going to use chown in the initial version to enforce the
ownership/permissions on the hierarchy. Only the cgroup manager has access
to the hierarchy, but it tries to access the hierarchy as the user that
sent the request. It was only meant to be a for now solution while the
real
