[Lxc-users] Debian Containers hangs when starting.

2012-07-09 Thread Glenn Daneels
Hi, I'm working on constructing a Debian template in a linux container. As I normally do not work on a Debian system, I'm working on a Virtualbox with Debian Wheezy (testing) and lxc 0.8.0~rc1-4 installed. I used a preseed configuration file (http://pastebin.com/SR5YXBqE). (Notice the puppet

Re: [Lxc-users] Debian Containers hangs when starting.

2012-07-09 Thread Glenn Daneels
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote: On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Glenn Daneels glenndane...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm working on constructing a Debian template in a linux container. As I normally do not work on a Debian system, I'm working on a

Re: [Lxc-users] Debian Containers hangs when starting.

2012-07-09 Thread Glenn Daneels
I found out what was missing in my debian template script. My config file asked for 6 tty's while probably only 2 got constructed (seems to be default by Squeeze), so I added: # squeeze only has /dev/tty and /dev/tty0 by default, # therefore creating missing device nodes for tty1-4.

[Lxc-users] multiple IP-addresses

2012-07-09 Thread Matthias P. Würfl
Hello! I habe a new container set up (precise on precise) and it works well. Network configuration is: lxc.network.type=veth lxc.network.link=br0 lxc.network.flags=up lxc.network.hwaddr = [...]:ed:d8 lxc.network.ipv4 = 84.16.228.72/32 if i add a second id address: lxc.network.type=veth

Re: [Lxc-users] multiple IP-addresses

2012-07-09 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 07/09/2012 10:43 AM, Matthias P. Würfl wrote: Hello! I habe a new container set up (precise on precise) and it works well. Network configuration is: lxc.network.type=veth lxc.network.link=br0 lxc.network.flags=up lxc.network.hwaddr = [...]:ed:d8 lxc.network.ipv4 = 84.16.228.72/32

Re: [Lxc-users] multiple IP-addresses

2012-07-09 Thread Matthias P. Würfl
Am 09.07.2012 17:29, schrieb Stéphane Graber: This isn't LXC specific, what's happening in your case is that you're contacting eth1 but getting a reply from eth0 as that's where your default route is. OK, but in real world (without LXC) I'd configure eth0 and eth0:1. This doesn't work with