Re: [Lxc-users] lxc-start leaks network interfaces?

2012-10-11 Thread Dan Kegel
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote: Thanks, Dan. I've reproduced it and commented in the bug. It's not really a bug in lxc. I at least when the veth is destroyed a uevent should be sent saying net-device-removed. Still digging/thinking. Now I

Re: [Lxc-users] lxc-start leaks network interfaces?

2012-10-11 Thread Stéphane Graber
On 10/11/2012 03:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote: Thanks, Dan. I've reproduced it and commented in the bug. It's not really a bug in lxc. I at least when the veth is destroyed a uevent should be sent saying

[Lxc-users] uevent when moving nic between network namespaces?

2012-10-11 Thread Serge Hallyn
Hi, Dan Kegel (cc:d) found an interesting nuisance relating to upstart and network interfaces with lxc containers. In particular, when you start a container, two veths are created. A uevent for their creation is sent, and so a 'network-interface' upstart job is created for each. One of the