On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
Quoting Shibashish (shi...@gmail.com):
I am on CentOS 6.3 and got lxc working on it. But when I run lxc-ps or
lxc-netstat, i get the following errors...
lxc-ps: no cgroup mount point found
lxc-netstat: no cgroup
I have been seeing reproducible freezes each time I start a VirtualBox VM
when at least one of my LXC containers are already running. Even my mouse
cursor is frozen, and all I could do is a hard reset each time.
Here are some of the cases that I have tried:
1.) Starting a VirtualBox VM when
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Olivier Archer
olivier.arc...@ifremer.fr wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list, and i've just build my first container under ubuntu
12.04.
I've got some problemes with the automounter, and my probleme seem to be
the same as in this threads:
I start a debian os in lxc, the debian has X server. when the debian login
window shows, i found that my keyboard and mouse don't work,
i have nothing to do but to reboot my computer. what's wrong with it?
See if ssh works from a different machine and look at the xorg log. I
think this is an
Some people have been testing btrfs on 3.1/3.2 kernels (in ubuntu
precise) with good results.
I am using 3.1 / 3.2 kernels on 64 bit gentoo with btrfs at work on 2
production severs since ~ November of last year. One holds my lxc
containers for a samba bdc while the other container is a
Many hypervisor based virtualization technologies can use
single root IO virtualization(SR-IOV) to improve isolation and
performance of virtual machine.
Does Linux container also support this?
There is no virtulization with LXC. LXC does runs at full host disk
performance. With that said you
btrfs isn't stable. When it is, you'll need that kernel (e.g. 2.6.38),
not just a new btrfs-tools userland. So basically for production you
should just be waiting until 12.04 LTS.
I would expect it to be 2.6.42 to 2.6.46. Since 2.6.38 is just 3 months away.
John
Sorry, I pulled .38 out of my arse; I didn't mean to imply it was a
meaningful number.
I would be happy if it becomes stable by your other guess. I mean
ubuntu 12-04. We shall see.
John
--
Lotusphere 2011
Register now
Do you have linux client for your samba server container?
I have not tried mounting the lxc based samba server in any linux machine.
Do you have users home directories from this server?
Yes. But this is a test box. I have done a little testing but user
shares from this are not in production.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Osvaldo Filho arquivos...@gmail.com wrote:
Environment:
===
Host:
Ubuntu 10.04 x64
Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
lxc 0.7.1-1
r...@srvltsp01:/home/lxc/lucid64# cat config.lucid-64
lxc.utsname = lucid64
lxc.tty = 4
lxc.network.type
I gave a reboot command (accidently) from container. Although it did
not reboot the system, it made it less functional. All the vtys were
closed and could not open any new terminal. Had to reboot the system
to make it functional again.
Have any one seen such behavior ? This is with 2.6.32
NON-VT Hardware vs VT Hardware
Any advantage?
Not with this type of virtualization. Guests run at near 100% native on either.
John
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself.
12 matches
Mail list logo
