On 07/12/12 00:48, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 06/12/12 20:06, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on the subject, any reason for lxc-destroy now being destructive?
Wait, isn't that the point? It's in the name and
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
You have to add an option to the config file for your systemd
containers.
lxc.autodev = 1
I would like to understand a bit more about what this option does and
learn the correct way of creating devices inside a container.
With autodev,
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 07/12/12 00:48, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 06/12/12 20:06, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on the subject, any reason for lxc-destroy now being destructive?
Wait, isn't that
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
You have to add an option to the config file for your systemd
containers.
lxc.autodev = 1
I would like to understand a bit more about what this option does
and learn the correct way of creating devices
On 07/12/12 13:50, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 07/12/12 00:48, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 06/12/12 20:06, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on the subject, any reason for lxc-destroy
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 07/12/12 13:50, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 07/12/12 00:48, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 06/12/12 20:06, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 05/12/12 21:59, Serge Hallyn wrote:
You have to specify a template, i.e. '-t debian'.
Oh. I wasn't using a template.
Up to now, I have an existing root fileyststem, say
/srv/lxc/mycontainer.x86_64 that is pointed to by my configuration
file, say
On 06/12/12 17:10, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 05/12/12 21:59, Serge Hallyn wrote:
You have to specify a template, i.e. '-t debian'.
Oh. I wasn't using a template.
Up to now, I have an existing root fileyststem, say
/srv/lxc/mycontainer.x86_64 that is pointed to
On 12/06/2012 02:45 PM, John wrote:
On 06/12/12 17:10, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 05/12/12 21:59, Serge Hallyn wrote:
You have to specify a template, i.e. '-t debian'.
Oh. I wasn't using a template.
Up to now, I have an existing root fileyststem, say
On 06/12/12 19:48, Stéphane Graber wrote:
On 12/06/2012 02:45 PM, John wrote:
On 06/12/12 17:10, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 05/12/12 21:59, Serge Hallyn wrote:
You have to specify a template, i.e. '-t debian'.
Oh. I wasn't using a template.
Up to now, I have
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on the subject, any reason for lxc-destroy now being destructive?
Wait, isn't that the point? It's in the name and all.
When was it ever nondestructive?
On 06/12/12 20:06, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on the subject, any reason for lxc-destroy now being destructive?
Wait, isn't that the point? It's in the name and all.
When was it ever nondestructive?
It only destroyed the
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
On 06/12/12 20:06, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, John l...@jelmail.com wrote:
While on the subject, any reason for lxc-destroy now being destructive?
Wait, isn't that the point? It's in the name and all.
When was it ever
On 04/12/12 21:29, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I raised the question about LXC/systemd a while back and have been
trying to follow the conversation but I have to admit it's going
somewhat over my head. I've also been away on another piece of work but
would now like to understand where things
Quoting John (l...@jelmail.com):
If so, I'd be grateful for some guidance on what I need to do to to my
configuration to make it work.
Right now, you'll have to build from git.
I will go away and do a git build later today.
I presume that would be from
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:00 +, John wrote:
On 04/12/12 21:29, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
I raised the question about LXC/systemd a while back and have been
trying to follow the conversation but I have to admit it's going
somewhat over my head. I've also been away on another piece of
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
You have to add an option to the config file for your systemd
containers.
lxc.autodev = 1
Phrasing it this way makes me wonder, should lxc look for
'$rootfs/dev/console' and automatically set lxc.autodev if
that is not found?
(Right now if
On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:09 -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
You have to add an option to the config file for your systemd
containers.
lxc.autodev = 1
Phrasing it this way makes me wonder, should lxc look for
'$rootfs/dev/console' and
On 05/12/12 14:55, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
[...]
Ah yes, the pivot root problem. I have worked around this for the time
being by doing a mount --make-rprivate /. I created a systemd service
on the host as an after dependency on systemd-remount-fs.service to
do this. I believe this is ok in
On 26/10/12 22:02, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 12:11 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
I SUSPECT the hang condition is something to do with
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 20:40 +, John wrote:
[...]
I'm also happy to help test this if I can. If it helps I am on Arch Linux.
There are two problems. One is systemd in an lxc container. I think we
have a rope
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:11 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Note that there are reports that LXC has issues with the fact that newer
systemd enables shared mount propagation for all mounts by default (this
should actually be beneficial for containers as this ensures that new
mounts appear in
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 18:52 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:51 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
/me erasing everything at this point and taking off the
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 18:52 +0100, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Should be moot given my patch, which I intend to push this week, but
why
couldn't a lxc.hook.mount do the whole thing, mount /dev and and
populate
it? I wasn't thinking a lxc.hook.start, for the reasons you
encountered,
but I assume
/me erasing everything at this point and taking off the systemd crew,
since this will have no relevance to them...
Testing the hook feature out using git rev (finally got it built)...
I added this line to my config...
lxc.mount.entry=tmpfs /srv/lxc/private/Plover/dev.tmp tmpfs defaults 0 0
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
/me erasing everything at this point and taking off the systemd crew,
since this will have no relevance to them...
Testing the hook feature out using git rev (finally got it built)...
I added this line to my config...
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:51 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:40 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
/me erasing everything at this point and taking off the systemd crew,
since this will have no relevance to them...
Testing the hook feature out using git rev
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 19:44 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Michael H. Warfield at 26/10/12 18:18 did gyre and
gimble:
What the hell is this? /var/run is symlinked to /run and is mounted
with a tmpfs.
Yup, that's how /var/run and /run is being handled these days.
It
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 20:30 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
Adding in the lxc-devel list.
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 22:59 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 15:42 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 14:02 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 13:23
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 12:11 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
I SUSPECT the hang condition is something to do with systemd trying to
start and interactive
Sorry for taking a few days to get back on this. I was delivering a
guest lecture up at Fordham University last Tuesday so I was out of
pocket a couple of days or I would have responded sooner...
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:59 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 22:50 +0200,
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
Sorry for taking a few days to get back on this. I was delivering a
guest lecture up at Fordham University last Tuesday so I was out of
pocket a couple of days or I would have responded sooner...
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 16:59 -0400, Michael H.
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:19 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
Sorry for taking a few days to get back on this. I was delivering a
guest lecture up at Fordham University last Tuesday so I was out of
pocket a couple of days or I would have responded
Hey Serge,
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:19 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
Sorry for taking a few days to get back on this. I was delivering a
guest lecture up at Fordham University last Tuesday so I was out of
pocket a couple of days or I would
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 13:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Hey Serge,
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:19 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
...
Oh, sorry - I take back that suggestion :)
Note that we have mount hooks, so templates could install a mount hook to
mount a tmpfs onto /dev and
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 13:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Hey Serge,
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:19 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
...
Oh, sorry - I take back that suggestion :)
Note that we have mount hooks, so templates could
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 14:02 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 13:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Hey Serge,
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:19 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
...
Oh, sorry - I take back that
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
I've got some more problems relating to shutting down containers, some
of which may be related to mounting tmpfs on /run to which /var/run is
symlinked to.
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
I've got some more problems relating to shutting down containers, some
of which may be related to mounting
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 20:30 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 23:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 25.10.12 11:59, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
I've got some more problems relating to shutting
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 15:42 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 14:02 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 13:23 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
Hey Serge,
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 11:19 -0500, Serge
On 22/10/12 03:06, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 02:53 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com
wrote:
This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'ing the
lxc-users community and the Fedora
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 22:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 22.10.12 11:48, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote:
To summarize the problem... The LXC startup binary sets up various
things for /dev and /dev/pts for the container to run properly and this
works
On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 02:53 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com
wrote:
This is being directed to the systemd-devel community but I'm cc'ing the
lxc-users community and the Fedora community on this for their input as
well. I
45 matches
Mail list logo
