Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH] Re: read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 07:31 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Unfortunately, I also still find that if there's a -o remount,ro in the halt/reboot script, it still sets /dev/pts to ro and that still propagates to the host and to the other

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH] Re: read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:55 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 07:31 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Unfortunately, I also still find that if there's a -o remount,ro in the halt/reboot script, it still sets /dev/pts to

Re: [Lxc-users] [PATCH] Re: read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 07:31 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): Unfortunately, I also still find that if there's a -o remount,ro in the halt/reboot script, it still sets /dev/pts to ro and that still propagates to the host and to the other

Re: [Lxc-users] read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn se...@hallyn.com wrote: Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me): On Jul 15, 2011 12:01 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: Unfortunately, I also still find that if there's a -o remount,ro in the halt/reboot script, it still

Re: [Lxc-users] read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me): there it would seem. however, while i could *maybe* see the rootfs being an unconditional slave, i would NOT want to see any lxc default/enforcement preventing container - host propagation on a globally recursive scale. im of the opinion that the

Re: [Lxc-users] read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me): there it would seem. however, while i could *maybe* see the rootfs being an unconditional slave, i would NOT want to see any lxc default/enforcement preventing container - host

Re: [Lxc-users] read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me): there it would seem. however, while i could *maybe* see the rootfs being an unconditional slave, i would NOT want to see any lxc

Re: [Lxc-users] read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 16:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 15:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me): there

Re: [Lxc-users] read only rootfs

2011-07-19 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 15:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@xtfx.me):