Quoting Osvaldo Filho (arquivos...@gmail.com):
This is a question.
It is?
-serge
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first --
Quoting Nirmal Guhan (vavat...@gmail.com):
Hi,
Want to know if port numbers are virtualized for containers or do the
containers and host share the port space ? Please let me know.
Wrong layer. If the container shares a network namespace with the
host, then it shares its networking. If it
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
But also, since upgrading to kernel 2.6.36 (and already using lxc 0.7.2)
I haven't had to delete any cgroups manually anyways. It's probably not
my release_agent because I just noticed I didn't have a working
release_agent (no output in it's log,
Quoting Geordy Korte (gko...@gmail.com):
This basically tells me that pivot_root is umounting the mount I just made.
Can anyone help me with this??? I have also tried putting the mount inside
the fstab for the container but same problem.
Have you entered the container to verify? I would
You have:
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:3 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:5 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:8 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:9 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 4:* rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 5:0 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 5:1 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c
Quoting atp (andrew.phill...@lmax.com):
Hi,
Its not as simple as it seems. What you're asking for is to selectively
hide or modify what gets shown to container processes by the /proc file
system. In other words making /proc container aware. /proc is already
partially there - with the pid
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 01/21/2011 06:10 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Rename 'ubuntu' template to 'lucid'
Add new maverick and natty templates, which do much less tweaking
of the environment. These should only be used on a kernel which
supports sysfs tagging for /sys
Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
On Mon 2011-04-04 (19:35), Ulli Horlacher wrote:
My first Ubuntu 10.04 container is up and running on a Ubuntu 10.04 host,
but the container can only connect to the host (and vice versa), but not
to the world outside.
I found a
Quoting Krzysztof Karwacki (krzys...@motokirc.pl):
Hi!
I Compiled procfs from lxc sources, but when i want to lxc-execute –n vm0
/bin/bash I’ve got error.
root@debian:~# lxc-execute -n vm0 /bin/bash
lxc-execute: No such file or directory - failed to exec /usr/lib/lxc/lxc-init
Does
Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
On Tue 2011-04-12 (09:19), Ulli Horlacher wrote:
I use lxc with physical eth1.
I can start the container, connect to it, etc. Everything looks ok. But
when I stop the container and try to restart it, eth1 is no more availble.
Looks
Quoting sanjay (genacct...@gmail.com):
Hi! I am new to the technology and thread. I have two basic questions, hope
you can provide some guidance.
1. UID Privilege Isolation.
~
If I understand it right, currently if a host-uid and guest-uid have the
same numerical value,
Quoting Mauras Olivier (oliver.mau...@gmail.com):
Hello,
I'm struggling for two days now with some completely weird network
behaviours.
My host is a virtual machine hosted on an ESX farm. I planned to deploy
several containers on it to achieve various tasks.
Host is running Scientific
Quoting Christoph Mitasch (cmita...@thomas-krenn.com):
Hi,
I would really love to see the patch applied to latest Ubuntu natty
kernel to have lxc-attach working again.
Is this on the way?
Natty is closed. This patch isn't going into natty.
If Daniel resends the patchset, I'll happily
Quoting Greg Kurz (gk...@fr.ibm.com):
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 08:47 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Christoph Mitasch (cmita...@thomas-krenn.com):
Hi,
I would really love to see the patch applied to latest Ubuntu natty
kernel to have lxc-attach working again
Quoting Christoph Mitasch (cmita...@thomas-krenn.com):
Hi Serge,
great if you can create packages for Natty.
Kernel is built in ppa:serge-hallyn/lxc-natty
(https://launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/+archive/lxc-natty)
I've not tested it, but it should be precisely the same as Daniel's.
-serge
Quoting Greg Kurz (gk...@fr.ibm.com):
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 09:41 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
Is there a way to get the corresponding host PID for a container PID?
For example: inside the the container the process init has
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 05/03/2011 05:36 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 09:41 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
Is there a way to get the corresponding host PID for a container PID?
For example: inside
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Yes. And I think the positive side effect is we can determine if the
pid belongs to the same pid namespace than the current one when the
container_init is 1, no ?
Yup. (Presumably if one happens to access a /proc for a non-descendent
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com):
Hi,
At $work we're currently using KVM and setting it up so that it uses a
previously opened TAP interface: 'kvm -net tap,fd=3'. This way, we are
able to create the interface a set up a couple of ebtables filters on
it before going on. Now, we
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com):
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 14:52, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
Thanks for your response. Before scripting it, let's try manually first:
devs=`ls /sys/class/net/veth*`
ip link add type veth
newdevs=`ls /sys/class/net/veth
-by: Daniel Lezcano dlezc...@fr.ibm.com
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
I'm curious, whatcha got in mind?
---
src/lxc/confile.c | 12
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/confile.c b/src/lxc/confile.c
index 791f04f..d632404
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (dlezc...@fr.ibm.com):
On 05/13/2011 12:13 AM, Benjamin Kiessling wrote:
Hi,
under Debian (and in general I think) LVM requires udev to work
at all which makes it unusable in a container environment. Has
anybody tried to get it working in a container?
You can use
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com):
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 00:15, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
wrote:
I'm curious, whatcha got in mind?
I don't think you have to have something in mind to implement this.
Just that old motto Be lenient in what you accept :).
So if I
Quoting arkai...@gmail.com (arkai...@gmail.com):
I've setup a web server and do requests each 5 seconds from my laptop.
Then start tcpdump in the host machine and after a while I do lxc-start.
Inspecting later with wireshark, it looks like once the lxc guest finishes
DHCP negotiation and
Quoting Benjamin Kiessling (mittages...@l.unchti.me):
Hi,
That's still doable, just a bit more work. Take a look at
ls -l /dev/lxc
(or whatever is the vg you're looking at). It has symlinks to the real
devices. When you look at the link targets, you can find their maj:min.
Quoting arkai...@gmail.com (arkai...@gmail.com):
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.comwrote:
Make sure stp is on on the bridge inside your kvm guest.
If that doesn't work, I'll just have to try and reproduce, but you'll
probably need someone more
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
On 5/14/2011 9:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com):
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 00:15, Serge Hallynserge.hal...@canonical.com
wrote:
I'm curious, whatcha got in mind?
I don't think you have to have something
Quoting arkai...@gmail.com (arkai...@gmail.com):
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.comwrote:
Hm, I just did this on natty
(natty host, natty kvm VM, with a natty container inside that)
and could actually not reproduce your problem. Just a normal
Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
Is there an easy way to set up a disk limit for a container?
I could create a LVM partition for each container, but this is not what I
call easy :-}
(Not trying to argue, just probe)
Why do you call it not easy? Because you don't have
Quoting Corin Langosch (cor...@gmx.de):
On 19.05.2011 11:18, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
After some time users install data on their vservers and so the
snapshots grow over time.
disc: 500 GB (one big lvm partition)
lvm volume: 10 GB (has vserver base system installation)
snapshot 1: 5 GB (a
Quoting Roberto (prof...@gmail.com):
Hi all,
I'm new to LXC and I've been following the following instructions on
how to setup a container:
http://www.phenona.com/blog/using-lxc-linux-containers-in-amazon-ec2/
Unfortunately, it seems I cannot start a container. In fact, after I
run the
Quoting Roberto (prof...@gmail.com):
Not sure exactly what that tutorial is doing. Didn't see anything
obviously wrong with it. You might try verifying it by doing
lxc-create -f /usr/share/doc/lxc/examples/lxc-macvlan.conf -t ubuntu -n u1
lxc-start -n u1
Except the lxc-ubuntu
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 05/31/2011 01:44 PM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Daniel
Lezcanodaniel.lezc...@free.frwrote:
On 05/31/2011 12:33 PM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
it seems that lxc cannot handle cgroups when capabilities are not all in
Jinkeys. Could you please file a bug against 'linux (Ubuntu)' about
this? Or file it against lxc and I'll retarget it.
thanks,
-serge
Quoting Clemens Perz (cp...@gmx.net):
Hi!
Just hit something similar today. Ubuntu Lucid had a kernel update to
2.6.32-32 and now my dev container
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.comwrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 05/31/2011 01:44 PM, Ramez Hanna wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Daniel Lezcanodaniel.lezc
Quoting matthew byers (faintstlsa...@gmail.com):
Hey i am trying to run lxc on my laptop but am having problem setting up
bridge. My internet connection consist of a WAN that i have absolutely no
control over. I connect my tablet to the network and then tether it to my
laptop. I followed
lxcbr0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
SIOCSIFNETMASK: No such device
lxcbr0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
Failed to bring up lxcbr0.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.comwrote:
Quoting matthew byers (faintstlsa
Quoting matthew byers (faintstlsa...@gmail.com):
here is what i got when i ran last command:
stlsaint@stlsaint-devcore:~$ sudo /opt/bin/lxcbr0-up
iptables v1.4.4: host/network `' not found
Oh, fudge. The problem is I told you (in the blog post) to do
cat file EOF
hack hack $var hack hack
Quoting webcubator webcubator (webcuba...@mail.ru):
Hello!
Shortly...
I want to install natty as guest without network isolation
The problem is lxc-start hangs in this case
If I add network all works fine
With this network settings all works fine
-- cut --
lxc.network.type=veth
--
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
On 6/16/2011 3:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
I thought we killed this problem?
...
nj12:~ # rm -rf /sys/fs/cgroup/vps001
rmdir
Did that too. no joy.
In fact I did both the main directory
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
On 6/17/2011 12:06 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
On 6/16/2011 3:26 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
I thought we killed this problem?
...
nj12:~ # rm -rf /sys/fs/cgroup
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 14:00 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.comwrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr
Quoting Elliot Pahl (elliot.p...@gmail.com):
Is there a good solution for these issues? Is the solution to modify the
debootstrap template, or does it lie elsewhere?
Thanks for bringing this up, Elliot. I've gone ahead and backported
the oneiric lxc package to lucid and pushed it to
Hi Daniel,
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
+echo Tweaking configuration
+cp $lxc_path/$lxc_orig/config $lxc_path/$lxc_new/config
+sed -i '/lxc.utsname/d' $lxc_path/$lxc_new/config
+echo lxc.utsname = $hostname $lxc_path/$lxc_new/config
We should not assume lxc.utsname is
Actually, perhaps this is better integrated into the templates.
I'm working on consolidating and extending the ubuntu templates into
one, and it looks like maybe it's better to put the cloning stuff
into that. Though it makes the create command syntax all the more
baroque, which I don't like.
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com
My thought (which I meant to point out in the help output) was
that we should default to the latest LTS. lucid for now, 12.04
when it comes out.
What do you think?
If you think it's better to
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:13 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
Signed-off-by: Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com
My thought (which I meant to point out in the help output) was
that we should
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
Unless I missed something, the following commits should be good to
apply:
- [PATCH 1/2] lxc-create: pass remaining args to templates
- [PATCH 2/2] templates: consolidate and extend ubuntu templates
Then, the following should be fixed:
-
-ubuntu: always install lxcguest in postprocess
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
---
configure.ac |5 +-
doc/lxc-create.sgml.in|2 +-
templates/Makefile.am |5 +-
templates/lxc-lucid.in| 361 --
templates/lxc
This does not supplant the need for a manpage, but it's a start.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
---
src/lxc/lxc-create.in | 13 -
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-create.in b/src/lxc/lxc-create.in
index 00e6b21
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
---
src/lxc/conf.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/conf.c b/src/lxc/conf.c
index 483d375..2eb598b 100644
--- a/src/lxc/conf.c
+++ b/src/lxc/conf.c
@@ -1633,7 +1633,7 @@ int lxc_assign_network
Quoting Julien VAUBOURG (jul...@vaubourg.com):
Hi all,
I would like to handle disk quotas of my containers, but in avoiding to
use partitions.
With linux-vserver, this is possible with the xid tagging and the
vdlimit command[0].
Would you know if LXC can use xid in the same way
Quoting Devendra K. Modium (dmod...@isi.edu):
Hi
Please let me know is it possible to hide PCI devices inside the container.
Although I used the cgroups.deny=a option in the configuration script.
When I run the command lspci inside container, I can see all the devices
connected to host
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
...
F15 systemd: Passed.
F12 single mount: Passed.
F13 single mount: Passed.
F14 single mount: Passed.
F14 libcgroup:Failed.
I had the default /etc/cgconfig.conf file and here are the results:
[root@berserker-base ~]# cat
From: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
Otherwise building on armel fails with
checking for linux SRCARCH... configure: error: architecture
arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi not supported
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/745884 for details.
Author: Marcin Juszkiewicz
From: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
src/lxc/conf.c will explicitly mount it anyway. Furthermore, the fstab
entry, which is getting processed first, did not specify -o newinstance.
This can cause the host's devpts entry mount options to change, as in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu
From: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
As people seem to want it, i.e.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/800886
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
---
templates/lxc-ubuntu.in |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi,
following are three small patches which are applied in the Ubuntu
lxc package, on top of the current lxc git HEAD. Would you mind
applying these before tagging 0.7.5?
thanks,
-serge
--
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video
Quoting Elliot Pahl (elliot.p...@gmail.com):
Upgrading udev and plymouth in a lucid container seems to require access to
udev devices with the following lines in container/config
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 108:0 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = b 7:0 rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 10:200
Hi,
This mailing list is intended for users of the lxc.sf.net toolsuite.
While the libvirt lxc implementation is in many ways similar, there
definately are differences.
I point this out because your first step has to be to get more
debugging information, and I don't know that anyone here can
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
Hi,
I have started using lxc to setup a pre-production system instead of KVM
at first glance clone seemd to me that it would copy everything to a new roots
but turns out that in case of LVM it will snapshot
AFAIK snapshots are meant more for
Thanks, Ramez. It looks good to me. My only comment would be that
if the rootfs copy fails (either rsync or lvm clone), and you've
frozen the original container, then you need to unfreeze the original
container before erroring out.
-serge
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
* allow
Quoting nishant mungse (nishantmun...@gmail.com):
Hi all
I want to create a sym link between different containers. Is it possible to
create?and how?
Hm. How about doing a bind mount instead?
--
Special Offer --
Quoting nishant mungse (nishantmun...@gmail.com):
hi all
when i write create commnd it shows this output::
lxc-create -n ubuntu -t lucid -f /home/nishant/ubuntu.conf
debootstrap is /usr/sbin/debootstrap
Checking cache download in /var/cache/lxc/lucid/rootfs-
i386 ...
Downloading
Quoting Marios Titas (redneb8...@gmail.com):
Hi list,
I just ran into this problem: If you do
# mount --make-shared /
to mark / as a shared mount then lxc-start fails when you have
specified a lxc.rootfs in the configuration file. The error that
lxc-start gives is the following:
Quoting Arie Skliarouk (sklia...@gmail.com):
Hi,
Thank you for the instructions, but looks I did something wrong.
Sorry, no, my instructions weren't quite right. I'm going to spend a bit
of time right now whipping up some tested directions, and will get back to
you.
-serge
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@canonical.com):
Quoting Arie Skliarouk (sklia...@gmail.com):
Hi,
Thank you for the instructions, but looks I did something wrong.
Sorry, no, my instructions weren't quite right. I'm going to spend a bit
of time right now whipping up some tested
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
On 11/04/2011 01:16 PM, Huang Liang wrote:
Check out toft: https://github.com/exceedhl/toft. It provides rpm and
deb packages which already handles the dependencies on centos and
ubuntu.
why would one want this instead of
Quoting Alex Eagar (alexea...@gmail.com):
Can LXC use cgroups without libcgroup? For that matter, just to be
clear, can LXC use cgroups without cgroup-bin?
LXC doesn't need anything from cgroup-bin, and, if it did, cgroup-bin
could not deliver. (see below)
In what use case would
using LXC
chroot.
Nov 15: use security.ubuntu.com, not mirror. (stgraber)
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
---
templates/lxc-ubuntu.in | 31 +--
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/templates/lxc-ubuntu.in b/templates/lxc
Quoting Arie Skliarouk (sklia...@gmail.com):
Hi,
I understand that this is not the quite appropriate mailing list to ask the
question, but the question is related to the LXC tech we use on the server,
so here it goes:
Most of the time the LXC containers on our servers work properly, but
cgroup would be
/sys/fs/cgroup/subsys/o1,
it now becomes
/sys/fs/cgroup/subsys/initcgroup/lxc/o1
so if init is in cgroup '/' then o1's freezer cgroup would be:
/sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/lxc/o1
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
---
src/lxc/cgroup.c | 147
Quoting Derek Simkowiak (de...@simkowiak.net):
Serge,
Could you please elaborate on this comment?
(Of course, the containers must be on a different subnet)
Do you mean a TCP/IP subnet? If so, why does this limitation exist?
No I just mean that you have to make sure to
Quoting Fiedler Roman (roman.fied...@ait.ac.at):
Hello List,
I have problems finding information about lxc with system virtualization and
access restriction to /proc/kcore. In my setup, root in guest can read
/proc/kcore, data from host shows up in container kcore, so kcore is not
Quoting Fiedler Roman (roman.fied...@ait.ac.at):
Hi Serge,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Serge Hallyn [mailto:serge.hal...@canonical.com]
An: Fiedler Roman
Cc: lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Lxc-users] lxc and guest /proc/kcore access restriction
Quoting
Quoting Verdi March (cincaipat...@gmx.net):
As additional info, the network configuration of the container is as
follows:
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.flags = up
Quoting Verdi March (cincaipat...@gmx.net):
...
ifconfig br0 198.55.32.143 promisc up
...
That all looks fine... The fact that it works fine when logging in
from another machine but fails from the host itself must be relevant,
but how...
So your LAN is 198.55.32.X, and your containers are on
Quoting Arie Skliarouk (sklia...@gmail.com):
I don't have the /cgroup directory mounted. Somehow, the directory is
mounted automatically onto the /sys/fs/cgroup
*root@mf:~# df | grep cgroup
cgroup12368328 0 12368328 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
root@mf:~# ls /sys/fs/cgroup/
Quoting christian mueller (christian.muell...@gmx.de):
Hi Serge,
thanks for your reply and your work.
I assume you did '--path=/home/chm/lxc/myfirstcontainer/', not
'- path=/home/chm/lxc/myfirstcontainer/'?
yes, you are right.
Would you mind opening a bug on launchpad?
Quoting christian mueller (christian.muell...@gmx.de):
Hi Serge,
For now, I recommend you do it the old fashioned way: either symlink or
bind mount /home/chm/lxc to /var/lib/lxc:
rm -rf /var/lib/lxc
mkdir -p /home/chm/lxc
ln -s /home/chm/lxc /var/lib/lxc
Now just
Quoting István Király - LaKing (d...@yahoo.com):
Hi folks.
I accidentally zero-ed out my original fstab generated by anaconda on my
CentOs 6 box.
After recreation it looks like this:
UUID=5c4ef826-7786-43f7-8ebd-775f230e2e25 / ext4
defaults 1 1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:00 AM, David Kang dk...@isi.edu wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to run auditd on an LXC instance.
First of all, I cannot make kauditd start.
And $ service auditd start always fails.
Does it mean auditd does not work on an LXC instance?
I'll appreciate your
Quoting Gary Ballantyne (gary.ballant...@haulashore.com):
Hello List
Various templates have differing fstab definitions (at least for
ubuntu). For example, [1] includes only /proc and /sys, [2] further adds
/dev/pts,
You don't need devpts in there. Lxc sets that up itself regardless
Quoting Shweta Shinde (shwetasshind...@gmail.com):
I tried out LXC sf.net for creating containers. It works well.
According to following link, RHEL 6.2 will support LXC libvirt API.
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/6.2_Technical_Notes/index.html
It
During my testing I ran back into the issue of lxc-stop marking
/var/lib/lxc read-only.
So here is the deal. When a container shuts down, it tries to remount its
/ readonly. That doesn't work if the mount is busy (i.e. a file is held
open for write). If /var/lib/lxc is on the same fs as '/',
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Serge Hallyn (2012-02-09 19:30:29 +0100) wrote:
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Hi all. I'm running Debian's LXC 0.7.5 under Linux 3.2.0. I've set up
a shared mountpoint to dynamically export some host directories
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Serge Hallyn (2012-02-10 16:05:19 +0100) wrote:
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Serge Hallyn (2012-02-09 19:30:29 +0100) wrote:
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Hi all. I'm running Debian's LXC
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Serge Hallyn (2012-02-11 00:08:10 +0100) wrote:
Quoting Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (i...@selidor.net):
Serge Hallyn (2012-02-10 16:05:19 +0100) wrote:
mv /usr/bin/lxc-start /usr/bin/lxc-start.real
cat /usr/bin/lxc-start.mid EOF
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Ramez Hanna rha...@informatiq.org wrote:
hei
I have been able to get some form of f16 under lxc running but some quirks
so steps (untill i make a patch or a new script)
use the current lxc-fedora to create a
Quoting Whit Blauvelt (w...@transpect.com):
Hi,
Running 0.7.5 compiled and running on Debian Squeeze, with a Debian Squeeze
container, when I use lxc-console and view a configuration file for a daemon
which uses indents as part of its syntax, the file is displayed with each
line at the left
Quoting allen (allen303al...@gmail.com):
HI ALL:
My aim is to run a Graphical application in a container, then an
user connect to the container with a GUI interface, so that he can see
and operate the application.
As I want to separate all resources, I think I'll need a system
Quoting allen (allen303al...@gmail.com):
2012/2/20 Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com:
Quoting allen (allen303al...@gmail.com):
HI ALL:
My aim is to run a Graphical application in a container, then an
user connect to the container with a GUI interface, so that he can see
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 01:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer to test it :)
Worked fine for me. Tested create and clone of ubuntu, ubuntu
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 04:13 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 01:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer
Quoting Ulli Horlacher (frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de):
On Fri 2012-03-02 (09:02), Daniel Baumann wrote:
i'm not claiming btrfs is there yet, however, if you're using btrfs, you
should at least make sure to use something remotely up2date, say 3.2.x.
SLES11 SP2 was released this week with
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
On 03/02/2012 11:18 AM, Arun M wrote:
With the 0.8.0 version, you will be able to setup the gateway directly
from the configuration file.
Cool. I wanted to try this so tested with the latest code from repository.
However hit another
Quoting Bekir Dogan (beki...@gmail.com):
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 23:20, Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr wrote:
[...]
With the 0.8.0 version, you will be able to setup the gateway directly
from the configuration file.
Can we see project plans or a todo list or something
Quoting Bekir Dogan (beki...@gmail.com):
Hi;
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 19:27, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
[...]
Right now in ubuntu precise, it's
lxc-create -t ubuntu -n p1
lxc-start -n p1
[...]
If you want to deploy a bunch of cloned images, you can
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:28 PM, rha...@informatiq.org wrote:
From: InformatiQ rha...@informatiq.org
Signed-off-by: InformatiQ rha...@informatiq.org
---
templates/lxc-fedora.in | 35 +++
1 files
(rha...@informatiq.org):
i can do that but i didn't do it brcause it could be done differently for
different backingsrorage
I'll do it anyway and send patch later
--
Sent from my Nokia N9On 6.3.2012 16:59 Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Ramez Hanna (rha...@informatiq.org):
On Mon, Mar 5
1 - 100 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
