On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 20:10 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:32 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr
We ignore the line of in the configuration file not beginning by lxc.
So we can mix the configuration file with another
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:32 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr
We ignore the line of in the configuration file not beginning by lxc.
So we can mix the configuration file with another information used for
another component through the lxc library.
Wow...
Quoting Brian K. White (br...@aljex.com):
On 5/14/2011 9:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com):
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 00:15, Serge Hallynserge.hal...@canonical.com
wrote:
I'm curious, whatcha got in mind?
I don't think you have to have something
Quoting David Serrano (dserra...@gmail.com):
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 00:15, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com
wrote:
I'm curious, whatcha got in mind?
I don't think you have to have something in mind to implement this.
Just that old motto Be lenient in what you accept :).
So if I
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (dlezc...@fr.ibm.com):
From: Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezc...@free.fr
We ignore the line of in the configuration file not beginning by lxc.
So we can mix the configuration file with another information used for
another component through the lxc library.
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 00:15, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
I'm curious, whatcha got in mind?
I don't think you have to have something in mind to implement this.
Just that old motto Be lenient in what you accept :).
--
David Serrano
