Re: [Lynx-dev] colo(u)red figcaptions

2022-11-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 05:22:40AM -0600, rb...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote: > 'I'd check the diff by using dtd_util to regenerate the header > files.' > dtd_util? WWW/Library/Implementation/dtd_util.c (read the makefile, to see how it is used). -- Thomas E. Dickey

Re: [Lynx-dev] How stable is 2.9.0?

2022-11-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:21:17PM -0400, Travis Siegel wrote: > For what it's worth, I've been using 2.9.0 since version dev 5, and I've not > encountered any major bugs with it.  I'm fairly confident it will be plenty > stable enough for your use. > > It's possible you'll find something else

Re: [Lynx-dev] How stable is 2.9.0?

2022-11-01 Thread Travis Siegel
For what it's worth, I've been using 2.9.0 since version dev 5, and I've not encountered any major bugs with it.  I'm fairly confident it will be plenty stable enough for your use. It's possible you'll find something else thatwon't do the trick for you, but it's plenty stable enough for

[Lynx-dev] How stable is 2.9.0?

2022-11-01 Thread Mouse
The lynx I've been using - 2.8, from 1999 - started exhibiting a disturbing failure mode, today: I got "lynx in free(): warning: chunk is already free.", indicating a memory-management bug, and, in at least one session, got a coredump (ditto, but even more so). I could just treat this as a

Re: [Lynx-dev] colo(u)red figcaptions

2022-11-01 Thread rbell--- via Lynx-dev
'I'd check the diff by using dtd_util to regenerate the header files.' dtd_util? russell bell