On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:09:33PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
[...]
MenuBackend.h:100: instantiated from here
boost/boost/checked_delete.hpp:26: `sizeof' applied to incomplete type
`Menu'
oost/boost/checked_delete.hpp:27: invalid use of undefined type `class Menu'
Menubar_pimpl.h:32:
John Levon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:11:09AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
John Levon wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476
Can somebody please look at it ?
The problem is that I don't really like the approach and so I
don't like to apply the patches. You can set the
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:52:06PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
Nearly everything that's needed for a better system is in place
already with this work but I'd rather see this patch committed to
a branch (so it won't be lost) and then extended to a
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:30:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| | Any objections to me removing all this code now?
| | (It has been disabled since we started the 1.3.0cvs tree)
|
| This is the patch to do so.
|
| What was this good for
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:09:33PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
[...]
MenuBackend.h:100: instantiated from here
boost/boost/checked_delete.hpp:26: `sizeof' applied to incomplete type
`Menu'
oost/boost/checked_delete.hpp:27: invalid use of undefined type `class Menu'
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:20:28PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
I thing it was the inlining of Menu::submenu() (with a reset() on the
smart pointer). Compilation seems to go a bit further now.
Yes, indeed. Update cvs, and then:
Ok. Try again.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 06:18:29PM +0200, Asger Kunuk Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
char getISOEncoded(int c) {
if (c 0x100) {
// ISO-8859-1
return c 0xff; // This converts Unicode characters to ISO-8859-1
}
if (c is in ISO-8859-2) {
return
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:10:44AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| then we can remove tabular-old and the minipage gook too ?
I guess the minipage gook is already out with the PEXTRA patch.
But after this, yes the tabular-old could be removed.
We don't have yet a lyx2lyx module for
Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:22:58AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
The code for compatibility read should not be in the lyx sources.
It is quite easy to do in lyx2lyx. If you don't know how,
write the differences between the old new formats and I'll do it.
Thanks Dekel!
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 08:30, Dekel Tsur wrote:
But after this, yes the tabular-old could be removed.
We don't have yet a lyx2lyx module for converting old tablulars, so this
should wait.
Actually we have half of it (in my tree), I will work on it during this
week. So this shouldn't
Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Dekel Tsur wrote:
| On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:22:58AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
| The code for compatibility read should not be in the lyx sources.
| It is quite easy to do in lyx2lyx. If you don't know how,
| write the differences between the old
Rob Lahaye wrote:
Thanks Dekel!
(*) same applies to size_type 0
(**) same applies to size_type 1
(***) same applies to lyxsize_type 0
These three lines should have been erased before sending. Please ignore.
Hello LyX-developers,
(Premature) congratulations with lyx 1.2.1!
Already, I've a bug report.
When playing with inserting and deleting math columns in LyX, strange things
happen.
Deleting a column (M-m c d) does not always work, even though it only contains
placeholders. Adding a column (M-m
Paul == Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Just a minor glitch in this text:
Thanks. No matter how hard I try it seems I never manage to avoid
those typos...
JMarc
Paul == Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
Just a small note to say that I have prepared the 1.2.1 release and
that the files are already on the ftp server.
Paul I just tried compiling this on Debian/Woody and get this:
Paul
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
Deleting a column (M-m c d) does not always work, even though it only
contains placeholders. Adding a column (M-m c i) sometimes adds two
columns, instead of one. For example if I want to delete a column in a
three column
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars | On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:50:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lars | Dekel BTW, what about applying my patch to 1.2.1cvs ?
Lars |
Lars | I will probably do it, but after 1.2.1.
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 10:53, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:33:09AM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
Deleting a column (M-m c d) does not always work, even though it only
contains placeholders. Adding a column (M-m c i) sometimes adds two
columns, instead of one. For
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
A the moment the intent of the implementation seems to be: use columns in
equations without letting the user worry about or even know about \equation,
\align or \eqnarray. This is a very nice idea and great from a user
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
A the moment the intent of the implementation seems to be: use columns in
equations without letting the user worry about or even know about \equation,
\align or \eqnarray. This is a very nice idea and great from a user
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:46:31PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
BTW, I prefer that C-enter in an inline/display equation would create
an align environment and not eqnarray.
Eqnarray is obsolete.
I know your opinion on that issue ;-)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 11:41, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:36:46AM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
A the moment the intent of the implementation seems to be: use columns in
equations without letting the user worry about or even know about
\equation, \align or
We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.2.1.
LyX 1.2.1 is a maintenance release which fixes many bugs in version
1.2.0. We hope in this way to enhance world happiness, allowing the
developers to continue busily to prepare the next major release
1.3.0. There are a lot of fixes in there, and
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:16:33PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
I've looked at some math environments for latex and I've notices that what I
want isn't eqnarray or align, but multiline and or split. Unfortunately, I
read that these aren't supported yet.
Not exaclty true. Only the menu
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 12:33, you wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:16:33PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote:
I've looked at some math environments for latex and I've notices that
what I want isn't eqnarray or align, but multiline and or split.
Unfortunately, I read that these aren't
http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/equations/node17.html
not found, but referenced from
http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/mathmode.php
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
I don't understand (sorry :) - what encoding must c be in here ? I can
get utf8 from Qt. So I have to write stuff from utf8-the right
encoding. Is that OK ?
I would propose Unicode. Basically, it's up to you. If Qt provides
Unicode, then that's your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On August 21 2002 06:18 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.2.1.
Just want to say THANKS for such a high-quality piece of software!!!
- --
Simon Perreault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote:
Since you use getISOEncoded for keyboard handling, I think that
char getISOEncoded(int c, Encoding enc)
Yes, this is the best option, but it requires changing the rest of
the code as well, because you have to introduce the Encoding.
That's a good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
Can you doublecheck that fl_set_object_shortcut is not in forms.h? I
really do not see how this can happen.
Looks like it was actually my very own fault:
Might it be a problem in debian
packaging of xforms?
As i've now found out i didn't
I've just tried to compile the qt2 frontend, but gave up when I discovered
that config.h now changes when configuring for the different frontends
I realise that it's daft to test for stuff that's not used, but feel that
it's also daft to have to re-build my entire tree when changing frontends.
Marco Morandini
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/insets/insetcite.C,v
retrieving revision 1.32.2.2
diff -u -r1.32.2.2 insetcite.C
--- src/insets/insetcite.C 2002/08/21 10:29:23 1.32.2.2
+++ src/insets/insetcite.C 2002/08/21 12:40:59
-362,7 +362,7
string::const_iterator
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I realise that it's daft to test for stuff that's not used, but feel that
it's also daft to have to re-build my entire tree when changing frontends.
Sort of defeats GUI-I in my view!
What about having the source in lyx-devel and
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I realise that it's daft to test for stuff that's not used, but feel that
it's also daft to have to re-build my entire tree when changing frontends.
Sort of defeats GUI-I in my view!
|
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 1:49 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I realise that it's daft to test for stuff that's not used, but feel that
it's also daft to have to re-build my entire tree when changing
frontends. Sort of defeats
... the other way round.
This removes the math specific 'math-row-insert' (MATH_ROW_INSERT) etc
lfuns and provides support for the outer world's LFUN_TABULAR_FEATURE
instead.
It get not properly disabled if not appropriate, but I'll look into that
later.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give
Please have a look guys, I don't want to redo everything after you see the
patch. This is quite a complicate dialog.
Ed.
On Tue Aug 20, 2002 20:10, Edwin Leuven wrote:
back from a short vacation I picked up again qt's new document dialog and
am doing a bit of rearranging both to make things
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 1:49 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I realise that it's daft to test for stuff that's not used, but feel that
it's also daft to have to re-build my entire tree when
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 2:11 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 1:49 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I realise that it's daft to test for stuff that's not used, but
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre ... the other way round.
Andre This removes the math specific 'math-row-insert'
Andre (MATH_ROW_INSERT) etc lfuns and provides support for the outer
Andre world's LFUN_TABULAR_FEATURE instead.
This looks like a good idea, but now we will
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:56:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
What's the conceptual problem?
No problem if it is that simple...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 2:11 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 1:49 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
I realise that it's
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 2:34 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What's the conceptual problem?
that autoconf, automake is aimed at setting stuff up that way?
I have a better solution, but it won't be ready for a while.
For now you really should use the srcdir != builddir solution.
For
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:32:28PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre This removes the math specific 'math-row-insert'
Andre (MATH_ROW_INSERT) etc lfuns and provides support for the outer
Andre world's LFUN_TABULAR_FEATURE instead.
This looks like a good idea, but now we will have the
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 4:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log message:
the 'tabular unifiaction patch' (even with the removal of duplicated menu
entries)
http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/lyxfunc.C?r1=1.370r2=1.371
If we have mathed::dispatch(), should we
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:31:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
If we have mathed::dispatch(), should we also have mathed::getStatus() ?
Yes.
[And we should rename localDispatch into dispatch and everything that can
disptch() should have a getStatus()]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:31:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
If we have mathed::dispatch(), should we also have mathed::getStatus() ?
Yes.
[And we should rename localDispatch into dispatch and everything that can
disptch() should
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Note that maintanibility is a small concern for 1.2.x. I
Jean-Marc think this one will go in, since ``...'' does not make
Jean-Marc sense in hebrew. However, for 1.3.0, a better solution is
Jean-Marc to be found, I guess.
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 2:34 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What's the conceptual problem?
that autoconf, automake is aimed at setting stuff up that way?
I have a better solution, but it won't be ready for a while.
For now you really should
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
You could enforce that with this...
I know.
But then, it's not too hard to get right.
[Btw, I already loath the boost::nocopyable all over the place. I can
make a private unimplemented c'ctor and assignment within two lines
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:31 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 2:34 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| What's the conceptual problem?
that autoconf, automake is aimed at setting stuff up that way?
I have a better
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:32 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
You could enforce that with this...
I know.
But then, it's not too hard to get right.
[Btw, I already loath the boost::nocopyable all over the place. I can
make a
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
You could enforce that with this...
| I know.
| But then, it's not too hard to get right.
| [Btw, I already loath the boost::nocopyable all over the place. I can
| make a private
My new organization can be seen below.
sides, columns, extra options will be grouped together since they are class
options
packages are together
the following options are a bit different from the rest
since these don't make it into the latex file:
* quote style
I have kept this with
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:32 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:53:17PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
You could enforce that with this...
I know.
But then, it's not too hard to get right.
[Btw, I already loath the
But it's a great goal.
Personally I couldn't care less
Ed.
Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But it's a great goal.
| Personally I couldn't care less
Care to say why?
(else why make a comment at all?)
--
Lgb
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:45:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
You shouldn't listen too hard when Andre begins with his include file
bashing... (it is not parsing files that take time for the compiler)
Probably not. But then, Cato had success with this strategy...
Lars, is there a way
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:51 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:45:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
You shouldn't listen too hard when Andre begins with his include file
bashing... (it is not parsing files that take time for the compiler)
Probably not. But then,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:35:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
cvs diff -D date
That gives me all changes...
I just want Lars' paragraph stuff...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:53 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
and these two:
* float placement
* ps driver
I wonder whether we want these as per document settings? Wouldn't it be
more logical to have these only in the global preferences?
I can imagine setting a per-document float
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:59 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:35:15PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
cvs diff -D date
That gives me all changes...
cvs diff -D before -D after
all you have to do is find out when he committed.
(I assume date can have hours and minutes
Care to say why?
why would I want to switch from the qt2 frontend to the xforms one f.e.?
really, I wouldn't know why. Each individual will have a preferred one and I
think switching for the sake of switching makes little sense because the
different frontends will have a different feel and
Edwin == Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Edwin I wonder whether we want these as per document settings?
Edwin Wouldn't it be more logical to have these only in the global
Edwin preferences?
At least float placement is a document setting (think about sending a
doc to someone else and
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:39:31PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
all you have to do is find out when he committed.
(I assume date can have hours and minutes too.)
Yes... -D -D does the trick indeed.
Andr'e
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor
Edwin == Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Edwin It was just a reflex: I don't like useless things as opposed to
Edwin useful ones (that's why I like LyX so much!) and the use of
Edwin this feature escapes me.
Edwin But perhaps I stand alone in this matter.
The feature will become
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 4:08 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Edwin == Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Edwin It was just a reflex: I don't like useless things as opposed to
Edwin useful ones (that's why I like LyX so much!) and the use of
Edwin this feature escapes me.
Edwin But
Thanks for pointing it out.
JMarc
Simon == Simon Perreault [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon On August 21 2002 06:18 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.2.1.
Simon Just want to say THANKS for such a high-quality piece of
Simon software!!!
Thanks Simon. We appreciate it.
JMarc
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:16:33PM +0200, Jos van den Oever
Andre wrote:
I've looked at some math environments for latex and I've notices
that what I want isn't eqnarray or align, but multiline and or
split. Unfortunately, I read that
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:41:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This could be he breakParagraph and breakParagraphConservative changes
I did.
Indeed. Reverting that part [your patch attached] fixes the crash.
Could you have a look at it again?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:41:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This could be he breakParagraph and breakParagraphConservative changes
I did.
| Indeed. Reverting that part [your patch attached] fixes the crash.
| Could you have a look at it
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| the old from new format. That should come with my patch! But where in the code does
| that happen? And what are the rules for incrementing the format version?
Whenever you change the .lyx format increase the format
Edwin Leuven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Care to say why?
| why would I want to switch from the qt2 frontend to the xforms one f.e.?
| really, I wouldn't know why. Each individual will have a preferred one and I
| think switching for the sake of switching makes little sense because the
|
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:39:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I will do.
I just found the problem.
[And the whole paragraph stuff is still a big pile of shit...]
Andre'
PS: Any reason why the Paragraph * is the _second_ argument to
breakParagraph? I would have thought having it as the
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 4:35 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
I have it set at 9, but only 4 show. My preferences file does say 9.
Garst
and Preferences-Inputs-Paths-Last file count says 9 as well?
(ie, LyX is using the expected ${HOME}/.lyx/preferences not a newly created
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| the old from new format. That should come with my patch! But where in the code
does
| that happen? And what are the rules for incrementing the format version?
Whenever you change
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 16:40, John Levon wrote:
Seeing we've had numerous problems with documents from testers that are
in intermediate formats, and the format is the major way that lyx2lyx
works, I suggest bumping the number on ANY format change. Why would this
be a problem ?
IMHO,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:13:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
But it's a great goal.
I still don't see why. It's major source uglification to save a bit of
disk space, and to increase start up time. Why ?
john
--
Way back at the beginning of time around 1970 the first man page was
handed
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:39:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I will do.
| I just found the problem.
Yes, I saw it too when I saw the diff you sent.
| [And the whole paragraph stuff is still a big pile of shit...]
Yes it is.
But more of the
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Think: server box with several users...
That's ridiculous !
alias lyx=lyx-gnome
john
--
Way back at the beginning of time around 1970 the first man page was
handed down from on high. Every one since is an edited copy.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:47:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Yes, but for all the intermediate versions we will not have
converters... (or should not have.)
We will have to have this conversion code anyway !
john
--
Way back at the beginning of time around 1970 the first man page
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:54:47PM +0100, José Abílio Oliveira Matos wrote:
IMHO, please, don't.
Anyone that uses the dev version should know better.
Make it possible for the next stable version to be able to correct any
anomalies it found. This should take care of those files.
But
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin To my great surprise AGU wanted me back on their InfoTech
Martin committee. It would be great if in their December meeting I
Martin could present LyX support for the AGUplus LaTeX class files.
Martin This requires support for layout file
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:13:01PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
But it's a great goal.
| I still don't see why. It's major source uglification to save a bit of
| disk space,
beg to differ, it will make the separation of the core and the gui
very
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Think: server box with several users...
| That's ridiculous !
| alias lyx=lyx-gnome
alias lyx=lyx --gui gnome
_what_ and _why_ is it ridiculous?
the gui will be more like a skin :-)
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:47:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Yes, but for all the intermediate versions we will not have
converters... (or should not have.)
| We will have to have this conversion code anyway !
No we won't.
--
Lgb
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
beg to differ, it will make the separation of the core and the gui
very clear.
It will make lots of ugly libdl lookups. Ick.
john
--
Way back at the beginning of time around 1970 the first man page was
handed down from
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:05:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
alias lyx=lyx --gui gnome
_what_ and _why_ is it ridiculous?
Give me ONE good reason that anybody other than a developer short on
disk space could EVER want this. There isn't, so why do it ?
the gui will be more like a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:57:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I'm saying there isn't far to go to get this to a much better state
than it is now. Most of the work has been done already -- in this
patch in fact -- just the last 10% to get rid of free floating
optional arguement insets (and
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:05:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
alias lyx=lyx --gui gnome
_what_ and _why_ is it ridiculous?
| Give me ONE good reason that anybody other than a developer short on
| disk space could EVER want this. There isn't, so
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
beg to differ, it will make the separation of the core and the gui
very clear.
| It will make lots of ugly libdl lookups. Ick.
a lot? one most likely...
(or none at all, depends on
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:12:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Give me ONE good reason that anybody other than a developer short on
| disk space could EVER want this. There isn't, so why do it ?
make install
installs both...
This is your good reason ??
How does cygwin cope with
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:07:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| We will have to have this conversion code anyway !
No we won't.
You've lost me
regards
john
--
Way back at the beginning of time around 1970 the first man page was
handed down from on high. Every one since is an
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:57:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I'm saying there isn't far to go to get this to a much better state
than it is now. Most of the work has been done already -- in this
patch in fact -- just the last 10% to get
Garst == Garst R Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Garst I have it set at 9, but only 4 show. My preferences file does
Garst say 9. Garst
And did you open more than 4 files?
I did try it out, and it worked as expected.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Martin On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 04:57:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
I'm saying there isn't far to go to get this to a much better state
than it is now. Most of the work has been done already --
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:12:18PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Give me ONE good reason that anybody other than a developer short on
| disk space could EVER want this. There isn't, so why do it ?
make install
installs both...
| This is your
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:07:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| We will have to have this conversion code anyway !
No we won't.
| You've lost me
temporary changes within the development cycle.
--
Lgb
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:27:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| We will have to have this conversion code anyway !
No we won't.
| You've lost me
temporary changes within the development cycle.
Rob's changes are permanent.
regards
john
--
Way back at the beginning of
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
