On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:47:47PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Any idea what patch has caused that?
Seems like any mouse clicks inside minipages/floats etc are eaten.
So it might be my fault whith the use lfuns for mouse clicks change
and the cause might be found in insets/insettext.C...
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:47:47PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Any idea what patch has caused that?
Seems like any mouse clicks inside minipages/floats etc are eaten.
So it might be my fault whith the use lfuns for mouse clicks change
and the cause might be found in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Rob == Rob Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rob I use
Rob :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/lyx
Rob What else is there?
I use cvs.lyx.org, which is the real cvs (because I am an important
person and have an account there :). I think anoncvs has a delay of a
Cool stuff.
I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all look fine.
Andre'
PS: [Numbers like '20136' or '41648' get written to the console, but
that's not really a problem].
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:49:12PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
No. I've just seen it.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:52:52AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all
look fine.
Hm... I just wonder: Is it a good idea to do the conversion automatically
without a warning?
After all, saving the doc after conversion destroys it,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
without this kind of stuff?
That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
that ParagraphList stuff
John Levon wrote:
Andre, Jug, please review, test and apply. Also there is a new bug that
where you have a cell selection in a table and click inside on of the
insettexts in a cell, a selection is made within the actual text. I
didn't see the immediate fix for this (if you can't fix this now,
John Levon wrote:
Can't we just do :
freezeUndo()
{
if (++undo_frozen_count == 1)
undo_frozen = true;
}
unfreezeUndo()
}{
if (--undo_frozen_count == 0)
undo_frozen = false;
}
IMO this counting is error prone. Anyway we could just put the
John Levon wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:53:36AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
OK, after several hours on the damn thing, I give up. I cannot fix this
bug.
w00t ! I got it. I was looking in totally the wrong place, and it was
very very simple. Oh well
You see it helps talking to
The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
pressing Escape
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
pressing Escape
Yep, here too.
I think there may be a list of problems with tooltips in a tabbed dialog.
E.g: when moving the
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to send this, so please forgive me it is my
first time to try and submit a bug report.
this may be old news, I know
when exporting docbook documents LyX 1.2.1 and 1.2.0 before it uses sect4title
/title/sect4 instead of para /para
fixing
Dear developpers,
I compiled lyx-1.3.0cvs under SuSE 8.0 and RedHat with xfroms 0.89 and
1.0RC4.
I tested the instant preview funnction on some textes. With small textes I
have no problems. But I have a longer text with the following behavior of
lyx and X-Windows:
I start lyx-1.3.0cvs in a
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:50:44AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
So I conclude that lyx2lyx is not at all installed with gmake install-strip.
Is this an bug in the install script?
I know. I didn't created the necessary configure*/Makefile* files needed to
install the script.
Since I don't know much
Any reason why cutpaste should not work anymore in math, Mr Levon? ;-}
1.373(levon24-Aug-02): case LFUN_CUT:
1.373(levon24-Aug-02): case LFUN_COPY:
1.373(levon24-Aug-02): disable =
!view()-getLyXText()-selection.set();
1.373
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 05:45:06PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Just noticed this now. It goes deeper and deeper in a nested enumerate,
but doesn't come back up. This happens during a write/read cycle of a .lyx
file. I did a test, and it happens during
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:10:22PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Proposal two has two interaction widgets. To handle this properly, we have
to add an additional keyword to store the value of the two widgets
(e.g. choicelist=color; checkbutton=don't display).
This means: one more
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:54:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Yes. Until you support all old functionality, you will probably not be
able to remove any code. Therefore you are just adding bloat :)
| User definable environments are valuable as
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Andre On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:46:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| Andre wrote: I guess that's why you are maintaining the stable branch
| Andre ;-}
That's not the point. When you are
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:11:25AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:54:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Yes. Until you support all old functionality, you will probably not be
able to remove any code. Therefore
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
without this kind of stuff?
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 08:00:16PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
You need to put the figure inside a figure float.
So when writing LaTeX output, the code should detect if the graphics is inside
a float or not. Is that possible?
| It would be better to
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:32:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Fix should be easy. Left as an exercise for the reader :-)
Martin, off to Thessaloniki for a week!
| Yep, this does it. Couldn't resist -- patch attached.
| 2002-08-24Martin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:12:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We already have one breakage now... begin_deeper end_deeper, let's not
add another before this one is fixed.
This seems to be fixed by Martin's patch. I'll just commit as it makes
things working at least for me (and looks
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:52:52AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all
look fine.
| Hm... I just wonder: Is it a good idea to do the conversion automatically
| without a warning?
I think
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:33:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Hm... I just wonder: Is it a good idea to do the conversion automatically
| without a warning?
I think there should be a warning, and the original file should not be
replaced.
It is only overwritten if one saves. But as
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:12:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We already have one breakage now... begin_deeper end_deeper, let's not
add another before this one is fixed.
| This seems to be fixed by Martin's patch. I'll just commit as it makes
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:52:52AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Cool stuff.
I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all look fine.
Andre'
PS: [Numbers like '20136' or '41648' get written to the console, but
that's not really a problem].
Those are just debug
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:40:28AM +0300, Alaa The Great wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to send this, so please forgive me it is
my first time to try and submit a bug report.
this may be old news, I know
when exporting docbook documents LyX 1.2.1 and 1.2.0
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
| that ParagraphList stuff right now!
Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
input/display/output of lyx, but of course I do have bugs in my code..
(I am perfectly willing
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
| that ParagraphList stuff right now!
Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
input/display/output of lyx, but of course I do have
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We still
have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a bit longer.
There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly without these kind of
change. One that
This somewhat changes semantics as the original version dispatches to
the main LyXText, whereas this patch dispatches to the one returned by
getLyXText(). I have played a bit around and could not find any problem so
I would guess it is safe. But as I am not sure it would be nice if somebody
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This somewhat changes semantics as the original version dispatches to
| the main LyXText, whereas this patch dispatches to the one returned by
| getLyXText(). I have played a bit around and could not find any problem so
| I would guess it is safe. But as
I'm not too much of an autotool expert, but I'm actually wondering why this
autogen.sh script is still used. Why can't the regular Makefile do the
same, by simply adding the required dependencies?
For example, why not having in the Makefile something like:
Because there's no Makefile in the
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:15:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This somewhat changes semantics as the original version dispatches to
| the main LyXText, whereas this patch dispatches to the one returned by
| getLyXText(). I have played a bit
On sobota 24 sierpie 2002 12:34 am, Rod Pinna wrote:
AFAIK, epsi is an EPS file with a bitmap thumbnail (stored as a
Postscript comment).
Yup. I have some files in that format, as I sometimes have a need to share
graphs with word users. Using .epsi means that they get a nice preview in
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
No I do not tell you that. The ParagraphList stuff is patches I have
been working on for several months.
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So
Andre Poenitz wrote:
No problem. All of the other text related lfuns dispatch to getLyXText()
and I can't see (yet) a technical reason why this should be different for
cutpaste...
I guess you tried it with multiple InsetText's (say a noteinset inside a
tabular inside a float).
The funny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
Paul == Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Updated *unofficial* Debian packages compiled with
Paul libforms_1.0-RC4.1 are available here:
Do you want them to go on ftp.lyx.org?
I'd need the approval of Jules Bean, the official
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So first you don't need to send patches to the list and
second we can
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I guess you tried it with multiple InsetText's (say a noteinset inside a
tabular inside a float).
I just tired nested tabulars, but that should have the same effect...
But it could also be that a BufferView does only have 1
Kuba Ober [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not too much of an autotool expert, but I'm actually wondering why this
autogen.sh script is still used. Why can't the regular Makefile do the
same, by simply adding the required dependencies?
For example, why not having in the Makefile something like:
This moves the generation of a few insets behind a common interface.
[The Plan is, of course, to have most/all of them there at some point of
time...]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This moves the generation of a few insets behind a common interface.
| [The Plan is, of course, to have most/all of them there at some point of
| time...]
This changes behavious as well?
--
Lgb
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This moves the generation of a few insets behind a common interface.
| [The Plan is, of course, to have most/all of them there at some point of
| time...]
This changes behavious
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| This moves the generation of a few insets behind a common interface.
| [The Plan is, of course, to have most/all of them there at some
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:47:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| No. Should be completely unvisible. It does not even move the creation
| from BufferView to LyXText::dispatch()
What about the insertAndEdit thing?
Used to be a private member of BufferView_pimpl. It's just moved down
On poniedziałek 26 sierpień 2002 11:15 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Kuba Ober [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not too much of an autotool expert, but I'm actually wondering why
this autogen.sh script is still used. Why can't the regular Makefile do
the same, by simply adding the required
On 23 Aug 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Allan == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Allan On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote:
Ah got it; a break missing in insetgraphicsParams.C:
switch (display) { [...] case InsetGraphicsParams::GRAYSCALE:
pars.display =
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
I also couldn't find where `Menu layout' was used. Those functions
in it don't appear to duplicated elsewhere either.
What is this ?
grep layout johns.ui
and you'll find that it is a menu containing entries for the charcter
styles: noun, emphasis
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Or just realize that subfigure has nothing to do with graphics at
all... it is a logical entity of its own.
It really does not belong in any graphics dialog.
Shall I then remove the entire Subfigure entry from the Graphics dialog?
What is the alternative?
Hi,
Open the BibTeX Database dialog and immediately click on [Choose]
(without selecting one of the available styles). Bang: SIGSEGV.
We need to catch whether a selection for style has been made
(i.e. fl_get_browser(dialog_-browser_styles) 0).
Patch to FormBibtex.C attached.
Rob.
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:47:47PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Any idea what patch has caused that?
Seems like any mouse clicks inside minipages/floats etc are eaten.
So it might be my fault whith the "use lfuns for mouse clicks" change
and the cause might be found in insets/insettext.C...
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 01:47:47PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
>>Any idea what patch has caused that?
>
>
> Seems like any mouse clicks inside minipages/floats etc are eaten.
> So it might be my fault whith the "use lfuns for mouse clicks" change
> and the cause might be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Rob" == Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Rob> I use
>
> Rob> :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/lyx
>
> Rob> What else is there?
>
> I use cvs.lyx.org, which is the real cvs (because I am an important
> person and have an account there :). I
Cool stuff.
I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all look fine.
Andre'
PS: [Numbers like '20136' or '41648' get written to the console, but
that's not really a problem].
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:49:12PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Have you tried John's patch from yesterday? It works for me here!
No. I've just seen it.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:52:52AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all
> look fine.
Hm... I just wonder: Is it a good idea to do the conversion automatically
without a warning?
After all, saving the doc after conversion "destroys"
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
> is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
> without this kind of stuff?
That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
that ParagraphList
John Levon wrote:
> Andre, Jug, please review, test and apply. Also there is a new bug that
> where you have a cell selection in a table and click inside on of the
> insettexts in a cell, a selection is made within the actual text. I
> didn't see the immediate fix for this (if you can't fix this
John Levon wrote:
> Can't we just do :
>
> freezeUndo()
> {
> if (++undo_frozen_count == 1)
> undo_frozen = true;
> }
>
> unfreezeUndo()
> }{
> if (--undo_frozen_count == 0)
> undo_frozen = false;
> }
>
IMO this counting is error prone. Anyway we could
John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 06:53:36AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
>
>>OK, after several hours on the damn thing, I give up. I cannot fix this
>>bug.
>>
>
>
> w00t ! I got it. I was looking in totally the wrong place, and it was
> very very simple. Oh well
You see it helps
The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
pressing
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
> field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
> pressing
Yep, here too.
I think there may be a list of problems with tooltips in a tabbed dialog.
E.g: when moving the
Hi all,
I'm not sure if this is the correct place to send this, so please forgive me it is my
first time to try and submit a bug report.
this may be old news, I know
when exporting docbook documents LyX 1.2.1 and 1.2.0 before it uses
instead of
fixing the sgml output is not simply a
Dear developpers,
I compiled lyx-1.3.0cvs under SuSE 8.0 and RedHat with xfroms 0.89 and
1.0RC4.
I tested the instant preview funnction on some textes. With small textes I
have no problems. But I have a longer text with the following behavior of
lyx and X-Windows:
I start lyx-1.3.0cvs in a
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 10:50:44AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> So I conclude that lyx2lyx is not at all installed with "gmake install-strip".
> Is this an bug in the install script?
I know. I didn't created the necessary configure*/Makefile* files needed to
install the script.
Since I don't know
Any reason why cut should not work anymore in math, Mr Levon? ;-}
1.373(levon24-Aug-02): case LFUN_CUT:
1.373(levon24-Aug-02): case LFUN_COPY:
1.373(levon24-Aug-02): disable =
!view()->getLyXText()->selection.set();
1.373(levon
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 05:45:06PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
>> Just noticed this now. It goes deeper and deeper in a nested enumerate,
>> but doesn't come back up. This happens during a write/read cycle of a .lyx
>> file. I did a test, and it
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:10:22PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Proposal two has two interaction widgets. To handle this properly, we have
> to add an additional keyword to store the value of the two widgets
> (e.g. choicelist=color; checkbutton=don't display).
> This means: one
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:54:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Yes. Until you support all old functionality, you will probably not be
>> able to remove any code. Therefore you are just adding bloat :)
>
| User definable environments are
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Andre> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:46:41PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
| Andre> wrote: I guess that's why you are maintaining the stable branch
| Andre> ;-}
>>> That's not the point.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:11:25AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:54:02PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Yes. Until you support all old functionality, you will probably not be
> >> able to remove any code.
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Because Lars started doing the paragraph list changes here and this stuff
>> is strongly related? And the paragraph cleanup probably can't bve done
>> without this kind of stuff?
>
| That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 08:00:16PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>> > You need to put the figure inside a figure float.
>>
>> So when writing LaTeX output, the code should detect if the graphics is inside
>> a float or not. Is that possible?
>>
>
| It would
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 02:32:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
>> Fix should be easy. Left as an exercise for the reader :-)
>>
>> Martin, off to Thessaloniki for a week!
>
| Yep, this does it. Couldn't resist -- patch attached.
>
| 2002-08-24
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:12:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We already have one breakage now... begin_deeper end_deeper, let's not
> add another before this one is fixed.
This seems to be fixed by Martin's patch. I'll just commit as it makes
things working at least for me (and looks
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:52:52AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all
>> look fine.
>
| Hm... I just wonder: Is it a good idea to do the conversion automatically
| without a warning?
I
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:33:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Hm... I just wonder: Is it a good idea to do the conversion automatically
> | without a warning?
>
> I think there should be a warning, and the original file should not be
> replaced.
It is only overwritten if one saves.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:12:11AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> We already have one breakage now... begin_deeper end_deeper, let's not
>> add another before this one is fixed.
>
| This seems to be fixed by Martin's patch. I'll just commit as it
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:52:52AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Cool stuff.
>
> I just translated a few docs written in 1998 with 0.12 and they all look fine.
>
> Andre'
>
> PS: [Numbers like '20136' or '41648' get written to the console, but
> that's not really a problem].
Those are
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 11:40:28AM +0300, Alaa The Great wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the correct place to send this, so please forgive me it is
>my first time to try and submit a bug report.
>
> this may be old news, I know
> when exporting docbook documents LyX 1.2.1 and
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
> | that ParagraphList stuff right now!
>
> Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
> input/display/output of lyx, but of course I do have bugs in my code..
> (I am perfectly
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | That's no excuse. IMO that it was a _really_ bad move of Lars to introduce
>> | that ParagraphList stuff right now!
>> Why? I have taken a lot of care to not change neigher
>> input/display/output of lyx, but of course I
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:00:55PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Because I think we agreed to have a fast release this time. We still
> have lot's of bugs to fix and IMO this could have waited a bit longer.
There are a few things that cannot be fixed properly without these kind of
change. One
This somewhat changes semantics as the original version "dispatches" to
the "main" LyXText, whereas this patch dispatches to the one returned by
getLyXText(). I have played a bit around and could not find any problem so
I would guess it is safe. But as I am not sure it would be nice if somebody
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This somewhat changes semantics as the original version "dispatches" to
| the "main" LyXText, whereas this patch dispatches to the one returned by
| getLyXText(). I have played a bit around and could not find any problem so
| I would guess it is safe.
> I'm not too much of an autotool expert, but I'm actually wondering why this
> autogen.sh script is still used. Why can't the regular Makefile do the
> same, by simply adding the required dependencies?
> For example, why not having in the Makefile something like:
Because there's no Makefile in
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:15:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This somewhat changes semantics as the original version "dispatches" to
> | the "main" LyXText, whereas this patch dispatches to the one returned by
> | getLyXText(). I have
On sobota 24 sierpie 2002 12:34 am, Rod Pinna wrote:
> > AFAIK, epsi is an EPS file with a bitmap thumbnail (stored as a
> > Postscript comment).
>
> Yup. I have some files in that format, as I sometimes have a need to share
> graphs with word users. Using .epsi means that they get a nice preview
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No I do not tell you that. The ParagraphList stuff is patches I have
> been working on for several months.
I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
changes there. So
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> No problem. All of the other text related lfuns dispatch to getLyXText()
> and I can't see (yet) a technical reason why this should be different for
> cut
I guess you tried it with multiple InsetText's (say a noteinset inside a
tabular inside a float).
> The funny thing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jean-Marc Lasgouttes) writes:
> > "Paul" == Paul Seelig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul> Updated *unofficial* Debian packages compiled with
> Paul> libforms_1.0-RC4.1 are available here:
>
> Do you want them to go on ftp.lyx.org?
>
I'd need the approval of Jules
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I believe you nevertheless it would have been nice to have in a branch
> before that. IMO you should start now a branch an put all your further
> changes there. So first you don't need to send patches to the list and
> second we can
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I guess you tried it with multiple InsetText's (say a noteinset inside a
> tabular inside a float).
I just tired nested tabulars, but that should have the same effect...
> But it could also be that a BufferView does only have 1
Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm not too much of an autotool expert, but I'm actually wondering why this
>> autogen.sh script is still used. Why can't the regular Makefile do the
>> same, by simply adding the required dependencies?
>> For example, why not having in the Makefile
This moves the generation of a few insets behind a common interface.
[The Plan is, of course, to have most/all of them there at some point of
time...]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This moves the generation of a few insets behind a common interface.
| [The Plan is, of course, to have most/all of them there at some point of
| time...]
This changes behavious as well?
--
Lgb
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
