On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:22:03AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
PD: [and talking about 1.4+] How far is the code from having a document
iterator, that gives a char at a time?
It's doable, and I'd guess we'll have a stab at it in the 1.4 cycle.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:37:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
$VISUAL is supposed to be the name of a $EDITOR that doesn't require a
terminal. Save some pain and just use $VISUAL instead of $EDITOR to
invoke your editor.
Ah. I did not know that. Maybe because I rarely use editors that don't need
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen I installed automake 1.6 and had to upgrade also to autoconf
Juergen 2.56, now autogen.sh tells me that autoconf 2.56 is not
Juergen supported by LyX, are we serious about that?
Probably not. Try it.
I
On Thursday 12 December 2002 16:32, John Levon wrote:
It should have list-specific behaviour, if it's any good...
for kmail reply to list is *L* (*l* works also). I'm using it in conjunction
with mutt and both work.
regards
john
--
José Abílio
John Levon wrote:
Currently, I don't have the time for doing a patch.
maybe someone else can
I did.
Jürgen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| Juergen == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Juergen I installed automake 1.6 and had to upgrade also to autoconf
| Juergen 2.56, now autogen.sh tells me that autoconf 2.56 is not
| Juergen supported by LyX, are we
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Then allow 2.56 too in the autogen script.
It is nice that we allow only autoconf version that we know work
there.
Well yes the problem is that I don't know if autconf 2.56 does need
automake 1.6. Do you know more than me about that?
Jug
--
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Incidentally, I have patches for many of the xforms bugs that
Angus currently affect LyX. I really think that rolling out an xforms
Angus tree is a good idea. Once we've proved they work, it'll be easy
Angus to get them rolled into the
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Then allow 2.56 too in the autogen script.
| It is nice that we allow only autoconf version that we know work
| there.
|
| Well yes the problem is that I don't know if autconf 2.56 does need
| automake 1.6. Do you know
On Friday 13 December 2002 9:29 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thursday 12 December 2002 9:50 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| | Incidentally, I have patches for many of the xforms bugs that
| |
Hello,
I think I have finally found a tabular bug that is easily reproducible
and - hopefully - easy to debug. (And I hope all known tabular problems
are related to each other. )
- Open file tableerror.lyx;
- for i = 1 to 25:
- move cursor down to the i-th cell/row (with the keyboard)
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
Angus future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
Angus interested but no time for active development. That means
Angus also that anyone interested in fixing the
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:01 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
Angus future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
Angus interested but no time for active
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I think I have finally found a tabular bug that is easily reproducible
and - hopefully - easy to debug. (And I hope all known tabular problems
are related to each other. )
- Open file tableerror.lyx;
- for i = 1 to 25:
- move cursor down to the i-th cell/row
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of
xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both 0.88 and 0.89.
The former because it's really old and doesn't have image support. The
latter because
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Friday 13 December 2002 11:01 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
Angus future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
Angus Leeming wrote:
Agreed. Lars is suggesting setting up an entirely separate tree. I anticipate
having #ifdefs in LyX's xforms frontend for the foreseeable future.
Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of xforms
to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:28 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Other than that I have still 0.88 installed and compile with
it ;) as surely have other people too. I would like to release 1.3.0 which
still suports all version but announce that the next version will support
only 1.0 version of xforms
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
Angus version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
Angus out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former because it's really old and
Angus doesn't have image support. The latter
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other old
| programs.
For compiling them, or running them?
--
Lgb
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:23 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of
xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both 0.88 and 0.89.
The former because it's
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:13:00PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
How much of the cruft would remain if we settle at 0.89.5 as minimum?
1 #ifdef block only and 1 piece of combox.C that should have a #if
FL_VERSION 1 but doesn't. I'll strip all but this block out and we can
make a decision
On Friday 13 December 2002 12:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
PS:
$ grep -n #if *.[Ch] | sed -n '/FL_/p'
Too much sed lately?
Perhaps not enough grep. I dunno why I dodn't use this:
grep -n '#if' *.[Ch] | grep 'FL_'
Perhaps becuase I was trying to do it as a single command for match RE1
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus On Friday 13 December 2002 12:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
PS: $ grep -n #if *.[Ch] | sed -n '/FL_/p'
Too much sed lately?
Angus Perhaps not enough grep. I dunno why I dodn't use this:
Angus grep -n '#if' *.[Ch] | grep 'FL_'
What
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
| Angus version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
| Angus out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former because it's really
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars | Angus Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on
Lars what | Angus version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd
Lars
On Friday 13 December 2002 2:44 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Angus Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
| Angus version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars (what are the differences between 0.89.5 and 0.89.6?)
Jean-Marc I think that 0.89.6 is a bug fix over 0.89.6 only.
Hmmpf. Make that ``I think that 0.89.6 is only a bug fix over 0.89.5.''
Actually, the file lib/Change says:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Freitag, 13. Dezember 2002 14:15, Michael Schmitt wrote:
Could you please tell me whether you can reproduce the problem with this
description?
I have tried, but cannot reproduce. (xforms = 1.0).
Sorry.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 12 December 2002 8:10 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
I'm going to cc the lyx-devel list with this. If I can find anyone
willing to test this stuff out, I'll be very happy indeed.
Hi Angus,
I'd be happy to test x86, linux. If you have specific tests you want
Pretty trivial, but posted anyway.
Ok to apply Lars?
--
Angus
ifdef.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other old
| programs.
For compiling them, or running them?
For compiling them.
On Friday 13 December 2002 3:33 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other
| old programs.
For
I am going to commit soon my last changes to 1.2.2. I will not tag the
release right now, since I do not have time to check properly that
everything is OK. I'll do it o monday.
Kayvan, could you please begin to prepare rpms for linux? We also need
rpms for xforms 1.0final.
I also did not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am going to commit soon my last changes to 1.2.2. I will not tag the
| release right now, since I do not have time to check properly that
| everything is OK. I'll do it o monday.
|
| Kayvan, could you please begin to prepare rpms for linux? We
A little further info: I ran lyx1.3 remotely through win2k/ssh/x-win32,
the font is correct.
--
Bo Peng
John Levon wrote:
should be fixed now
Strange, it does not work correctly here.
If there are any suggestions in the browser, the first item is inserted into
the replacement combo; if no suggestion exist, the replacement from the last
word ist kept.
I do not find the mistake though.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
I do not find the mistake though.
Of course not. I should have rebuilt after cvs up.
Sorry,
Jürgen
Some peopel have a hard time figuring out their sub address because
they do not know how to view the full headers under their mailers.
So I'd like somebody to put either a URL or the actual info on the
lyx.org webpage.
I was thinking that I will make a copy of
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:22:03AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> PD: [and talking about 1.4+] How far is the code from having a document
> iterator, that gives a char at a time?
It's doable, and I'd guess we'll have a stab at it in the 1.4 cycle.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:37:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> $VISUAL is supposed to be the name of a $EDITOR that doesn't require a
> terminal. Save some pain and just use $VISUAL instead of $EDITOR to
> invoke your editor.
Ah. I did not know that. Maybe because I rarely use editors that don't
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> I installed automake 1.6 and had to upgrade also to autoconf
Juergen> 2.56, now autogen.sh tells me that autoconf 2.56 is not
Juergen> supported by LyX, are we serious about that?
Probably not. Try it.
On Thursday 12 December 2002 16:32, John Levon wrote:
>
> It should have list-specific behaviour, if it's any good...
for kmail reply to list is *L* (*l* works also). I'm using it in conjunction
with mutt and both work.
> regards
> john
--
José Abílio
John Levon wrote:
> > Currently, I don't have the time for doing a patch.
> maybe someone else can
I did.
Jürgen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >>"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Juergen> I installed automake 1.6 and had to upgrade also to autoconf
| > Juergen> 2.56, now autogen.sh tells me that autoconf 2.56 is not
| > Juergen>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Then allow 2.56 too in the autogen script.
It is nice that we allow only autoconf version that we know work
there.
Well yes the problem is that I don't know if autconf 2.56 does need
automake 1.6. Do you know more than me about that?
Jug
--
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Incidentally, I have patches for many of the xforms bugs that
Angus> currently affect LyX. I really think that rolling out an xforms
Angus> tree is a good idea. Once we've proved they work, it'll be easy
Angus> to get them rolled
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Then allow 2.56 too in the autogen script.
| > It is nice that we allow only autoconf version that we know work
| > there.
|
| Well yes the problem is that I don't know if autconf 2.56 does need
| automake 1.6. Do you
On Friday 13 December 2002 9:29 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Thursday 12 December 2002 9:50 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | Incidentally, I have patches for many of the xforms bugs that
> |
Hello,
I think I have finally found a tabular bug that is easily reproducible
and - hopefully - easy to debug. (And I hope all known tabular problems
are related to each other. )
- Open file "tableerror.lyx";
- for i = 1 to 25:
- move cursor down to the i-th cell/row (with the keyboard)
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
Angus> future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
Angus> "interested but no time for active development". That means
Angus> also that anyone interested
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:01 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
> Angus> future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
> Angus> "interested but no
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I think I have finally found a tabular bug that is easily reproducible
and - hopefully - easy to debug. (And I hope all known tabular problems
are related to each other. )
- Open file "tableerror.lyx";
- for i = 1 to 25:
- move cursor down to the i-th
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of
> xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both 0.88 and 0.89.
> The former because it's really old and doesn't have image support. The
> latter
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 13 December 2002 11:01 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
>> Angus> future would pan out. I think that it
Angus Leeming wrote:
Agreed. Lars is suggesting setting up an entirely separate tree. I anticipate
having #ifdefs in LyX's xforms frontend for the foreseeable future.
Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of xforms
to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:28 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Other than that I have still 0.88 installed and compile with
> it ;) as surely have other people too. I would like to release 1.3.0 which
> still suports all version but announce that the next version will support
> only 1.0 version of
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
Angus> out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former because it's really old and
Angus> doesn't have image support.
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other old
| programs.
For compiling them, or running them?
--
Lgb
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:23 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of
> > xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both 0.88 and 0.89.
> > The former because
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:13:00PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > How much of the cruft would remain if we settle at 0.89.5 as minimum?
>
> 1 #ifdef block only and 1 piece of combox.C that should have a #if
> FL_VERSION < 1 but doesn't. I'll strip all but this block out and we can
> make a
On Friday 13 December 2002 12:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS:
> > $ grep -n "#if" *.[Ch] | sed -n '/FL_/p'
>
> Too much sed lately?
Perhaps not enough grep. I dunno why I dodn't use this:
grep -n '#if' *.[Ch] | grep 'FL_'
Perhaps becuase I was trying to do it as a single command for
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Friday 13 December 2002 12:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> PS: > $ grep -n "#if" *.[Ch] | sed -n '/FL_/p'
>>
>> Too much sed lately?
Angus> Perhaps not enough grep. I dunno why I dodn't use this:
Angus> grep -n '#if' *.[Ch] |
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
| Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
| Angus> out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on
Lars> what | Angus> version of xforms to
On Friday 13 December 2002 2:44 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
> | Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> (what are the differences between 0.89.5 and 0.89.6?)
Jean-Marc> I think that 0.89.6 is a bug fix over 0.89.6 only.
Hmmpf. Make that ``I think that 0.89.6 is only a bug fix over 0.89.5.''
Actually, the file lib/Change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Freitag, 13. Dezember 2002 14:15, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Could you please tell me whether you can reproduce the problem with this
> description?
I have tried, but cannot reproduce. (xforms = 1.0).
Sorry.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL
On Thursday 12 December 2002 8:10 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I'm going to cc the lyx-devel list with this. If I can find anyone
> > willing to test this stuff out, I'll be very happy indeed.
>
> Hi Angus,
> I'd be happy to test x86, linux. If you have specific tests you
Pretty trivial, but posted anyway.
Ok to apply Lars?
--
Angus
ifdef.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other old
| programs.
For compiling them, or running them?
For compiling them.
On Friday 13 December 2002 3:33 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
> > | version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other
> > | old
I am going to commit soon my last changes to 1.2.2. I will not tag the
release right now, since I do not have time to check properly that
everything is OK. I'll do it o monday.
Kayvan, could you please begin to prepare rpms for linux? We also need
rpms for xforms 1.0final.
I also did not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am going to commit soon my last changes to 1.2.2. I will not tag the
| release right now, since I do not have time to check properly that
| everything is OK. I'll do it o monday.
|
| Kayvan, could you please begin to prepare rpms for linux?
A little further info: I ran lyx1.3 remotely through win2k/ssh/x-win32,
the font is correct.
--
Bo Peng
John Levon wrote:
> should be fixed now
Strange, it does not work correctly here.
If there are any suggestions in the browser, the first item is inserted into
the replacement combo; if no suggestion exist, the replacement from the last
word ist kept.
I do not find the mistake though.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I do not find the mistake though.
Of course not. I should have rebuilt after cvs up.
Sorry,
Jürgen
Some peopel have a hard time figuring out their sub address because
they do not know how to view the full headers under their mailers.
So I'd like somebody to put either a URL or the actual info on the
lyx.org webpage.
I was thinking that I will make a copy of
78 matches
Mail list logo
