Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Here are the patch I propose to apply. We could have gone a
Jean-Marc bit further and use QuoteName on log messages too, instead
Jean-Marc of the explicit quoting.
Jean-Marc Lars, still OK?
Applied now.
JMarc
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:48:33PM +0200, Uwe St?hr wrote:
1. The last months I teached LyX to some colleagues and they all
complained that there is no button in the toolbar for view/update dvi.
Therefore I designed a new toolbar with new buttons. It looks like in
the attached file
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, everybody, please tell me what is missing in 1.3.6cvs,
according to you...
Georg I think the ams validate fix should go in (see my other mail).
Yes, this patch seems OK to me (both head and branch).
JMarc
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It seems to me that LyX 1.3.6 has enough changes in it to be worth
releasing.
What remains to be done? I can think of:
- windows support: Angus still has a some code he wants to
implement (related to
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 15:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin I have noticed that in many of my files, the line counter for
Martin LaTeX lags behind and the error boxes in the file are too high
Martin up. I think it is due to the XFig
Hi everybody,
I tried a full compilation of lyx-devel on Solaris-Sparc 8.
The compilation chunks on the lyx client with this:
ld: warning: file
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/../../libstdc++.so: linked to
/usr/local/lib/./libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
I've just installed the Invision Power File Manager (IPFM) here
http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm/index.php
and created a user account 'lyx' with the password 'LyXers'. Feel free to
check it out, and let me know if you find something that doesn't work
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the following patch (which I am too lazy to test myself :)
help?
Martin Eh, I'm sorry but I don't have a 1.3 tree checked out :-(
Do you have problems with 1.4.0cvs? The counting code seems reasonable
there (although there is a +1 I am
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 18:57, Georg Baum wrote:
Happy Easter everybody!
Am Freitag, 25. Mrz 2005 08:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
Does anyone know what the status of these AMS array structures is? They
are things like bmatrix, pmatrix etc. etc. I couldn't get any of these
to work.
They
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jean-Pierre [utf-8] Chrétien wrote:
I've just installed the Invision Power File Manager (IPFM) here
http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm/index.php
and created a user account 'lyx' with the password 'LyXers'. Feel free to
check it out, and let me know if you find
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| You're right on the money here. I'll ask Lars about enabling directory
| indexes for uploads/. Otherwise this will be one of the more frequently
| asked questions... In addition, it's nice to be able to browse the
| uploaded files without
Angus Leeming wrote:
OK, JMarc. No solution yet, but I have just finished building LyX 1.3.x
on Win32 and it does indeed display the problem. Screenshot attached.
Your mail suggests that you have the patch to hand. If so, throw it this
way. If not, then I'll go digging.
I dug. The attached
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jean-Pierre [utf-8] Chrétien wrote:
I've just installed the Invision Power File Manager (IPFM) here
http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm/index.php
and created a user account 'lyx' with the password 'LyXers'. Feel free to
check it out, and let
Hi Lars
Would it be possible to enable directory listings/indexes for the
directory uploads/ on the wiki server? I'm assuming that we are fine
with allowing people to browse the uploaded files.
With 'uploads/', I'm referring to this directory on aussie.lyx.org:
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the following patch (which I am too lazy to test myself :)
help?
Martin Eh, I'm sorry but I don't have a 1.3 tree checked out :-(
Do you have problems with 1.4.0cvs? The
Angus Leeming wrote:
- windows support: when loading a file in LyX through the explorer,
some action like viewing PDF subsequently fail. This is due to a
missing os::internal_path invocation on file names passed from the
command line. This is easy to do, but I'd prefer to see it done by
Hi,
It seems that tex2lyx barfs with File not readable if I \include
without the tex suffix, which is the required syntax in my latex distro
(texlive-2004).
So tex2lyx should add the .tex suffix for \included files,
or check existence if some distributions are not sensitive to its presence.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Before we release the code as 1.3.6, however, I think it would
Angus make sense to have some Windows guinea pigs to try it out and
Angus report on any obvious problems. Maybe a call for Windows
Angus testers mail to the lyx-users list?
Somebody should create a
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin I have noticed that in many of my files, the line counter for
Martin LaTeX lags behind and the error boxes in the file are too high
Martin up. I think it is due to the XFig external insets. Looking at
Martin insets/ExternalSupport.C there
John Levon wrote:
Any toolbar changes need to be against current 1.4cvs (which includes,
for example, both depth-decrement and depth-increment).
Of course against 1.4CVS, all proposals are for LyX 1.4 or 1.5.
I as stupid Win-user haven't ever seen LyX 1.4. So please be indulgent
with me if I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So, everybody, please tell me what is missing in 1.3.6cvs, according
to you...
I seem to remember Bennett saying that LyX refused to allow him to load a
filename into a dialog using the Browse button if the filename (file
path?) contained spaces.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
- windows support: Angus still has a some code he wants to implement
(related to forking?)
I'll try and get my arse in gear on this one, but really I don't think
that this should delay any release. The fact that Windows becomes an
officially supported platform is a
John Levon wrote:
Paragraph granularity is the best option I think. I don't have an
Fine.
opinion on the other question since I don't understand it (I ihaven't
spent the time to ...).
When the above is done well (which is not exactly the case in CVS), we have
a mathematical increasing
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 01:23:03AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
I agree. (even if I'm not sure we are lying, just that the
meaning of the scrollbar is different)
Hey, the Mac got away with it for years, so I suppose we'll survive :)
regards
john
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:24:24PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
John Levon wrote:
Any toolbar changes need to be against current 1.4cvs (which includes,
for example, both depth-decrement and depth-increment).
Of course against 1.4CVS, all proposals are for LyX 1.4 or 1.5.
I as stupid Win-user
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does the following patch (which I am too lazy to test myself :)
help?
Martin Eh, I'm sorry but I don't have a 1.3 tree checked out :-(
Do you have problems with
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Do you have problems with 1.4.0cvs? The counting code seems reasonable
there (although there is a +1 I am not sure to understand).
I was wondering about that too. Angus should know.
return int(lyx::count(str.begin(), str.end(),'\n') + 1);
How many lines in:
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> Here are the patch I propose to apply. We could have gone a
Jean-Marc> bit further and use QuoteName on log messages too, instead
Jean-Marc> of the explicit "quoting".
Jean-Marc> Lars, still OK?
Applied now.
JMarc
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 11:48:33PM +0200, Uwe St?hr wrote:
> 1. The last months I teached LyX to some colleagues and they all
> complained that there is no button in the toolbar for "view/update dvi".
> Therefore I designed a new toolbar with new buttons. It looks like in
> the attached file
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, everybody, please tell me what is missing in 1.3.6cvs,
>> according to you...
Georg> I think the ams validate fix should go in (see my other mail).
Yes, this patch seems OK to me (both head and branch).
JMarc
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It seems to me that LyX 1.3.6 has enough changes in it to be worth
>> releasing.
>>
>> What remains to be done? I can think of:
>>
>> - windows support: Angus still has a some code he wants to
>>
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 15:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> I have noticed that in many of my files, the line counter for
> Martin> LaTeX lags behind and the error boxes in the file are too high
> Martin> up. I think it is
Hi everybody,
I tried a full compilation of lyx-devel on Solaris-Sparc 8.
The compilation chunks on the lyx client with this:
ld: warning: file
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/../../libstdc++.so: linked to
/usr/local/lib/./libstdc++.so: attempted
multiple inclusion of file
Undefined
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> I've just installed the "Invision Power File Manager" (IPFM) here
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm/index.php
>
> and created a user account 'lyx' with the password 'LyXers'. Feel free to
> check it out, and let me know if you find something that
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Does the following patch (which I am too lazy to test myself :)
>> help?
Martin> Eh, I'm sorry but I don't have a 1.3 tree checked out :-(
Do you have problems with 1.4.0cvs? The counting code seems reasonable
there (although there
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 18:57, Georg Baum wrote:
> Happy Easter everybody!
>
> Am Freitag, 25. MÃrz 2005 08:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
>
> > Does anyone know what the status of these AMS array structures is? They
> > are things like bmatrix, pmatrix etc. etc. I couldn't get any of these
> > to
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jean-Pierre [utf-8] Chrétien wrote:
> > I've just installed the "Invision Power File Manager" (IPFM) here
> >
> > http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm/index.php
> >
> > and created a user account 'lyx' with the password 'LyXers'. Feel free to
> > check it out, and let me know if
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | You're right on the money here. I'll ask Lars about enabling directory
> | indexes for uploads/. Otherwise this will be one of the more frequently
> | asked questions... In addition, it's nice to be able to browse the
> | uploaded files without
Angus Leeming wrote:
OK, JMarc. No solution yet, but I have just finished building LyX 1.3.x
on Win32 and it does indeed display the problem. Screenshot attached.
Your mail suggests that you have the patch to hand. If so, throw it this
way. If not, then I'll go digging.
I dug. The attached
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Jean-Pierre [utf-8] Chrétien wrote:
>
>> > I've just installed the "Invision Power File Manager" (IPFM) here
>> >
>> >http://wiki.lyx.org/ipfm/index.php
>> >
>> > and created a user account 'lyx' with the password 'LyXers'. Feel free to
>> >
Hi Lars
Would it be possible to enable directory listings/indexes for the
directory uploads/ on the wiki server? I'm assuming that we are fine
with allowing people to browse the uploaded files.
With 'uploads/', I'm referring to this directory on aussie.lyx.org:
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Does the following patch (which I am too lazy to test myself :)
> >> help?
>
> Martin> Eh, I'm sorry but I don't have a 1.3 tree checked out :-(
>
> Do you have
Angus Leeming wrote:
- windows support: when loading a file in LyX through the explorer,
some action like viewing PDF subsequently fail. This is due to a
missing os::internal_path invocation on file names passed from the
command line. This is easy to do, but I'd prefer to see it done by
Hi,
It seems that tex2lyx barfs with ÂFile not readable if I \include
without the tex suffix, which is the required syntax in my latex distro
(texlive-2004).
So tex2lyx should add the .tex suffix for \included files,
or check existence if some distributions are not sensitive to its presence.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus> Before we release the code as 1.3.6, however, I think it would
Angus> make sense to have some Windows guinea pigs to try it out and
Angus> report on any obvious problems. Maybe a "call for Windows
Angus> testers" mail to the lyx-users list?
Somebody should create
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I have noticed that in many of my files, the line counter for
Martin> LaTeX lags behind and the error boxes in the file are too high
Martin> up. I think it is due to the XFig external insets. Looking at
Martin>
John Levon wrote:
Any toolbar changes need to be against current 1.4cvs (which includes,
for example, both depth-decrement and depth-increment).
Of course against 1.4CVS, all proposals are for LyX 1.4 or 1.5.
I as stupid Win-user haven't ever seen LyX 1.4. So please be indulgent
with me if I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So, everybody, please tell me what is missing in 1.3.6cvs, according
> to you...
I seem to remember Bennett saying that LyX refused to allow him to load a
filename into a dialog using the Browse button if the filename (file
path?) contained spaces.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming wrote:
>> - windows support: Angus still has a some code he wants to implement
>> (related to forking?)
>
> I'll try and get my arse in gear on this one, but really I don't think
> that this should delay any release. The fact that Windows becomes an
> officially supported platform
John Levon wrote:
> Paragraph granularity is the best option I think. I don't have an
Fine.
> opinion on the other question since I don't understand it (I ihaven't
> spent the time to ...).
When the above is done well (which is not exactly the case in CVS), we have
a mathematical increasing
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 01:23:03AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> I agree. (even if I'm not sure we are lying, just that the
> meaning of the scrollbar is different)
Hey, the Mac got away with it for years, so I suppose we'll survive :)
regards
john
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:24:24PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> >Any toolbar changes need to be against current 1.4cvs (which includes,
> >for example, both depth-decrement and depth-increment).
>
> Of course against 1.4CVS, all proposals are for LyX 1.4 or 1.5.
> I as stupid
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Does the following patch (which I am too lazy to test myself :)
> >> help?
>
> Martin> Eh, I'm sorry but I don't have a 1.3 tree checked out :-(
>
> Do you
Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Do you have problems with 1.4.0cvs? The counting code seems reasonable
>> there (although there is a +1 I am not sure to understand).
>
> I was wondering about that too. Angus should know.
return int(lyx::count(str.begin(), str.end(),'\n') + 1);
How many lines in:
54 matches
Mail list logo
