Richard Heck a écrit :
I thought about something like this:
RefCommand prop
RefStyle
\def...@proptxt{proposition}\newref{prop}{refcmd={\rs@proptxt \ref{#1}}
Rather
\RSaddto{\RSenglish}{%
\def...@proptxt{proposition}%
}%
\newref{prop}{refcmd={...@proptxt \ref{#1}}
or you kill the
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
spellchecker is not active.
If I see the from the preference, it is grey (see the attachment)
My lyx-1.6.7
Am 11.11.2010 um 10:18 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors,
When ./configure is run the available spellchecker header and libraries are
Am 11.11.2010 um 11:13 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
checking aspell.h usability... yes
checking aspell.h presence... yes
checking for aspell.h... yes
checking for new_aspell_config in -laspell... yes
checking whether to use aspell... yes
checking for name of aspell framework...
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Due to this, I think that it means that the code can be basically
destabilized, provided that there's consensus. Fine, good to know.
yes.
do you know the immigration story of kurt goedel? before entering u.s.
he went closely throught the constitution to be prepared for
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:59:01AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:57:48AM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I'd like you to guide me a bit in with respect to using the pipes
then. Detecting whether a pipe exists is indeed easy. However, I need
to add some
On 11/11/2010 03:35 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Richard Heck a écrit :
I thought about something like this:
RefCommand prop
RefStyle
\def...@proptxt{proposition}\newref{prop}{refcmd={\rs@proptxt \ref{#1}}
Rather
\RSaddto{\RSenglish}{%
\def...@proptxt{proposition}%
}%
Juergen,
the fact that we use in one dialog Indices and in another Indexes is
intended?
p
Op 11-11-2010 20:29, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Juergen,
the fact that we use in one dialog Indices and in another Indexes is
intended?
p
I already raised this point once, and Jurgen changed all occurrences of
Indices to Indexes after consulting some native speakers.
Is the Indices-string a new
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
I already raised this point once, and Jurgen changed all occurrences of
Indices to Indexes after consulting some native speakers.
Is the Indices-string a new string maybe ?
thanks
pavel
On 11/11/10 2:32 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 11-11-2010 20:29, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Juergen,
the fact that we use in one dialog Indices and in another Indexes
is intended?
p
I already raised this point once, and Jurgen changed all occurrences
of Indices to Indexes after
As I've always been curious about this, I decided to try and look it up.
According to Dictionary.com, both indexes and indices are correct. I think
that we should just pick one and stay consistent. When I see the term in
biomedical science, it is usually written as indexes. I've been told
Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
Hi
I posted the message below to the LyX-users mailing list, but guess it
is not the right list. So here it is on the devel list.
If your feeling is, this is not be important, please let me know.
I know that the beta release of LyX 2.0 just happened, but I think the
possibility to import track
Richard Heck a écrit :
I thought about something like this:
RefCommand prop
RefStyle
\def...@proptxt{proposition}\newref{prop}{refcmd={\rs@proptxt \ref{#1}}
Rather
\RSaddto{\RSenglish}{%
\def...@proptxt{proposition}%
}%
\newref{prop}{refcmd={...@proptxt \ref{#1}}
or you kill the
I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
using the following commands:
./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
make
sudo make install
everything ok no errors, but when I run lyx-2.0.0beta1, the
spellchecker is not active.
If I see the from the preference, it is grey (see the attachment)
My lyx-1.6.7
Am 11.11.2010 um 10:18 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
> I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
> using the following commands:
>
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
> make
> sudo make install
>
> everything ok no errors,
When ./configure is run the available spellchecker header and libraries
Am 11.11.2010 um 11:13 schrieb Waluyo Adi Siswanto:
>>
>> checking aspell.h usability... yes
>> checking aspell.h presence... yes
>> checking for aspell.h... yes
>> checking for new_aspell_config in -laspell... yes
>> checking whether to use aspell... yes
>> checking for name of aspell
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Due to this, I think that it means that the code can be "basically"
> destabilized, provided that there's "consensus". Fine, good to know.
yes.
do you know the immigration story of kurt goedel? before entering u.s.
he went closely throught the constitution to be
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:59:01AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 02:57:48AM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > I'd like you to guide me a bit in with respect to using the pipes
> > then. Detecting whether a pipe exists is indeed easy. However, I need
> > to add
On 11/11/2010 03:35 AM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Richard Heck a écrit :
I thought about something like this:
RefCommand prop
RefStyle
\def...@proptxt{proposition}\newref{prop}{refcmd={\rs@proptxt \ref{#1}}
Rather
\RSaddto{\RSenglish}{%
\def...@proptxt{proposition}%
}%
Juergen,
the fact that we use in one dialog "Indices" and in another "Indexes" is
intended?
p
Op 11-11-2010 20:29, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Juergen,
the fact that we use in one dialog "Indices" and in another "Indexes" is
intended?
p
I already raised this point once, and Jurgen changed all occurrences of
Indices to Indexes after consulting some native speakers.
Is the "Indices"-string
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I already raised this point once, and Jurgen changed all occurrences of
> Indices to Indexes after consulting some native speakers.
>
> Is the "Indices"-string a new string maybe ?
thanks
pavel
On 11/11/10 2:32 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 11-11-2010 20:29, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Juergen,
the fact that we use in one dialog "Indices" and in another "Indexes"
is intended?
p
I already raised this point once, and Jurgen changed all occurrences
of Indices to Indexes after
As I've always been curious about this, I decided to try and look it up.
According to Dictionary.com, both indexes and indices are correct. I think
that we should just pick one and stay consistent. When I see the term in
biomedical science, it is usually written as indexes. I've been told
Am 12.11.2010 um 00:33 schrieb Emil Pavlov:
> На 11.11.2010 10:18, Waluyo Adi Siswanto написа:
>> I just compile lyx-2.0.0beta1
>> using the following commands:
>>
>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-2.0.0beta1
>> make
>> sudo make install
>>
>> everything ok no errors, but when I run
Hi
I posted the message below to the LyX-users mailing list, but guess it
is not the right list. So here it is on the devel list.
If your feeling is, this is not be important, please let me know.
I know that the beta release of LyX 2.0 just happened, but I think the
possibility to import track
28 matches
Mail list logo
