RE: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

The user should not need to know these details of the preview generation. Instead, the preview machinery of LyX should be smart enough to use the right method automatically. Georg, trying first in a way and then in the other seems useless to me, just a delay. There's nothing that the legacy

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On 28/11/2010 10:13 AM, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: The user should not need to know these details of the preview generation. Instead, the preview machinery of LyX should be smart enough to use the right method automatically. Georg, trying first in a way and then in the other seems useless

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

From: Michal ms-li...@ms.sebdan.com Sent: Sun, 28 November, 2010 3:00:59 Subject: LyX 2.0 - some bugs [BUG #1] Branch insets override all the rmb menus, so for example the user cannot spellcheck single word inside the branch inset via rmb anymore. This makes working with

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:00:06PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: also dont know whether killing dvipng is harmless or introduce new regressions Well, right now dvipng is not mandatory. If it is not found in the path, the legacy method is anyway used. i remember

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: There's nothing that the legacy method can't render AFAIK. on what foundations is build this statement? (this is without any flaming intentions, i would like to know myself). pavel

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

Georg Baum wrote: I agree that TikZ and PSTricks are important, but I don't think that using a setting in LyX or in documents is a good idea. The user should not need to know these details of the preview generation. Instead, the preview machinery of LyX should be smart enough to use the

RE: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

@Julien: Also, dvipng won't necessarily fail, it's just that the rendered output is not what you would expect. So having two methods with the legacy method as fallback is not satisfactory. Dvipng writes warning on the stderr if something goes wrong to say it's not able to render certain PS

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Michal wrote: In this mail I've collected all the bugs with LyX 2.0beta1 I've spotted so far. Overall, the experience has been very pleasant, but there are some glitches worth correcting. My platform is (for now) Win XP SP3 Polish. If something is unclear, please ask - I'm writing

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On 28/11/2010 2:55 PM, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: In beta1 it doesn't work, don't know why, in trunk works fine. The difference with dvipng is that is not trimmed on the left side (opposite to numbers), this make it occupy more space but it's more similar to the final result, see the

Re: r36552 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 11/28/2010 07:27 AM, b...@lyx.org wrote: Author: baum Date: Sun Nov 28 13:27:52 2010 New Revision: 36552 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36552 Log: Fix bug #6853 (Short titles ignored when InPreamble is set to 1 in layout file) The fix includes required arguments and LaTeXParam, too.

Re: r36556 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 11/28/2010 12:02 PM, b...@lyx.org wrote: Author: baum Date: Sun Nov 28 18:02:10 2010 New Revision: 36556 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36556 Log: Fix bug #7091 and bug #7094 ...and thanks for this one, too. rh

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:31:16PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:00:06PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: also dont know whether killing dvipng is harmless or introduce new regressions Well, right now dvipng is not mandatory. If it is not

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: philosophically dvipng was introduced to replace legacy stuff which should be killed once dvipng is widespread enough, so next question mark... But dvipng is not able to preview everything the old method can. In this case I would say that legacy rhymes with

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

On 11/28/2010 01:21 AM, Michal Skrzypek wrote: I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an InPreamble tag, intended primarily for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the preamble. It should be possible to create a

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

rgh...@lyx.org wrote: @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ \html_math_output 0 \html_be_strict true \author 1 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes +\author 223010757 Richard Heck rgh...@brown.edu Richard, you have this line in lyx prefs right? pavel

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

Op 28-11-2010 23:14, Pavel Sanda schreef: rgh...@lyx.org wrote: @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ \html_math_output 0 \html_be_strict true \author 1 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes +\author 223010757 Richard Heck rgh...@brown.edu Richard, you have this line in lyx prefs right? pavel What do you mean ?

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: What do you mean ? just for sure. i remember years old flame when somebody tried to fetch private user info from environemnt and push it into lyx files automatically... that would be privacy issue. pavel

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:01:49PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: philosophically dvipng was introduced to replace legacy stuff which should be killed once dvipng is widespread enough, so next question mark... But dvipng is not able to preview everything the

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

On 11/28/2010 05:14 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: rgh...@lyx.org wrote: @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ \html_math_output 0 \html_be_strict true \author 1 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes +\author 223010757 Richard Heck rgh...@brown.edu Richard, you have this line in lyx prefs right? That was how it was. Now I've

I love GPL, what about you?

Hi guys! I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to LyX under the GPL license version 2 or later. I love the project and the open-source philosophy! venom00 P.S. Just use my nick venom00 to identify me, and if possible don't publish my e-mail address on any public website. Thanks.

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: Hi guys! I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to LyX under the GPL license version 2 or later. I love the project and the open-source philosophy! venom00 P.S. Just use my nick venom00 to identify me, and if possible don't publish my e-mail

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

On 29/11/2010 02:39, Pavel Sanda wrote: veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: Hi guys! I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to LyX under the GPL license version 2 or later. I love the project and the open-source philosophy! venom00 P.S. Just use my nick venom00 to identify me, and if

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: P.S. Just use my nick venom00 to identify me, and if possible don't publish my e-mail address on any public website. Thanks. is it enough that we encode the mail (against spambots) or you want fake address? In any case his email address is already in public mail

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use LaTeXType paragraph. Try this: [...] Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:28:56 + (GMT) Jim Oldfield jim_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: [BUG #1] [...] This is a general problem with LyX right click menus, both in 2.0 and 1.6: as soon as context-specific items are defined, they erase the default ones, rather than adding to them. For instance,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:15:44 +0100 Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: [...] Michal, thanks for your feedback. you reported however too many bugs to deal with them directly in this list. please push them into bugzilla so we can deal each of them individually. I kind of hoped that at least

RE: I love GPL, what about you?

is it enough that we encode the mail (against spambots) or you want fake address? It's OK to encode it, just to not make it appear in clear. Thanks. venom00

Re: no continuous spell check on beta1, but it works fine on svn

Am 29.11.2010 um 02:17 schrieb Jose Quesada: Hi Stefan, Running the beta1 code with --enable-build-type= development I get the attached output (lyx doesn't start). This happens because of the format change of the languages file. You have compiled the new parser code but not the new language

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 29.11.2010 um 04:26 schrieb Michal: On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:15:44 +0100 Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: [...] Michal, thanks for your feedback. you reported however too many bugs to deal with them directly in this list. please push them into bugzilla so we can deal each of them

RE: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

> The user should not need to > know these details of the preview generation. Instead, the preview machinery > of LyX should be smart enough to use the right method automatically. Georg, trying first in a way and then in the other seems useless to me, just a delay. There's nothing that the

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On 28/11/2010 10:13 AM, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: The user should not need to know these details of the preview generation. Instead, the preview machinery of LyX should be smart enough to use the right method automatically. Georg, trying first in a way and then in the other seems useless

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

> From: Michal > Sent: Sun, 28 November, 2010 3:00:59 > Subject: LyX 2.0 - some bugs > > [BUG #1] > Branch insets "override" all the rmb menus, so for example the user > cannot spellcheck single word inside the branch inset via rmb anymore. > This makes

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:00:06PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > also dont know whether killing dvipng is harmless or introduce new > > regressions > > Well, right now dvipng is not mandatory. If it is not found in the path, > the legacy method is anyway used. i

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: >There's nothing that the legacy method can't render AFAIK. on what foundations is build this statement? (this is without any flaming intentions, i would like to know myself). pavel

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

Georg Baum wrote: > I agree that TikZ and PSTricks are important, but I don't think that using a > setting in LyX or in documents is a good idea. The user should not need to > know these details of the preview generation. Instead, the preview machinery > of LyX should be smart enough to use the

RE: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

@Julien: > Also, dvipng won't necessarily fail, it's just that the rendered output > is not what you would expect. So having two methods with the legacy > method as fallback is not satisfactory. Dvipng writes warning on the stderr if something goes wrong to say it's not able to render certain

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Michal wrote: > In this mail I've collected all the bugs with LyX 2.0beta1 I've > spotted so far. Overall, the experience has been very pleasant, but > there are some glitches worth correcting. My platform is (for now) Win > XP SP3 Polish. > > If something is unclear, please ask - I'm

Re: [Poll] Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On 28/11/2010 2:55 PM, veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: In beta1 it doesn't work, don't know why, in trunk works fine. The difference with dvipng is that is not trimmed on the left side (opposite to numbers), this make it occupy more space but it's more similar to the final result, see the

Re: r36552 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

On 11/28/2010 07:27 AM, b...@lyx.org wrote: Author: baum Date: Sun Nov 28 13:27:52 2010 New Revision: 36552 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36552 Log: Fix bug #6853 (Short titles ignored when InPreamble is set to 1 in layout file) The fix includes required arguments and LaTeXParam, too.

Re: r36556 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

On 11/28/2010 12:02 PM, b...@lyx.org wrote: Author: baum Date: Sun Nov 28 18:02:10 2010 New Revision: 36556 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36556 Log: Fix bug #7091 and bug #7094 ...and thanks for this one, too. rh

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:31:16PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:00:06PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > also dont know whether killing dvipng is harmless or introduce new > > > regressions > > > > Well, right now dvipng is not

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > philosophically dvipng was introduced to replace legacy stuff which should > > be killed > > once dvipng is widespread enough, so next question mark... > > But dvipng is not able to preview everything the old method can. > In this case I would say that legacy rhymes

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

On 11/28/2010 01:21 AM, Michal Skrzypek wrote: I think this may be quite easy to do already, though it is a bit of a hack. LyX 2.0's layouts have an "InPreamble" tag, intended primarily for use with document classes that want, say, \title to be in the preamble. It should be possible to create a

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

rgh...@lyx.org wrote: > @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ > \html_math_output 0 > \html_be_strict true > \author 1 "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" > +\author 223010757 "Richard Heck" rgh...@brown.edu Richard, you have this line in lyx prefs right? pavel

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

Op 28-11-2010 23:14, Pavel Sanda schreef: rgh...@lyx.org wrote: @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ \html_math_output 0 \html_be_strict true \author 1 "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" +\author 223010757 "Richard Heck" rgh...@brown.edu Richard, you have this line in lyx prefs right? pavel What do you mean ?

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > What do you mean ? just for sure. i remember years old flame when somebody tried to fetch private user info from environemnt and push it into lyx files automatically... that would be privacy issue. pavel

Re: Patch for rendering PSTricks and TikZ in instant-preview(#7042)

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:01:49PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > philosophically dvipng was introduced to replace legacy stuff which > > > should be killed > > > once dvipng is widespread enough, so next question mark... > > > > But dvipng is not able to preview

Re: r36562 - in lyx-devel/trunk: lib/doc src

On 11/28/2010 05:14 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: rgh...@lyx.org wrote: @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ \html_math_output 0 \html_be_strict true \author 1 "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" +\author 223010757 "Richard Heck" rgh...@brown.edu Richard, you have this line in lyx prefs right? That was how it was. Now

I love GPL, what about you?

Hi guys! I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to LyX under the GPL license version 2 or later. I love the project and the open-source philosophy! venom00 P.S. Just use my nick "venom00" to identify me, and if possible don't publish my e-mail address on any public website. Thanks.

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: > Hi guys! > I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to LyX under the GPL > license version 2 or later. > I love the project and the open-source philosophy! > > venom00 > > P.S. Just use my nick "venom00" to identify me, and if possible don't publish >

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

On 29/11/2010 02:39, Pavel Sanda wrote: veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: Hi guys! I hereby grant permission to use my contributions to LyX under the GPL license version 2 or later. I love the project and the open-source philosophy! venom00 P.S. Just use my nick "venom00" to identify me, and if

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >>> P.S. Just use my nick "venom00" to identify me, and if possible don't >>> publish my e-mail address on any public website. Thanks. >> is it enough that we encode the mail (against spambots) or you want fake >> address? > > In any case his email address is already in

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

> I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use "LaTeXType > paragraph". Try this: > [...] Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:28:56 + (GMT) Jim Oldfield wrote: > > [BUG #1] > > [...] > This is a general problem with LyX right click menus, both in 2.0 and > 1.6: as soon as context-specific items are defined, they erase the > default ones, rather than adding to them. For

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:15:44 +0100 Pavel Sanda wrote: > [...] > Michal, thanks for your feedback. you reported however too many bugs > to deal with them directly in this list. please push them into > bugzilla so we can deal each of them individually. I kind of hoped that at

RE: I love GPL, what about you?

> is it enough that we encode the mail (against spambots) or you want fake address? It's OK to encode it, just to not make it appear in clear. Thanks. venom00

Re: no continuous spell check on beta1, but it works fine on svn

Am 29.11.2010 um 02:17 schrieb Jose Quesada: > Hi Stefan, > > Running the beta1 code with --enable-build-type= > development I get the attached output (lyx doesn't start). This happens because of the format change of the languages file. You have compiled the new parser code but not the new

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 29.11.2010 um 04:26 schrieb Michal: > On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:15:44 +0100 > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> [...] >> Michal, thanks for your feedback. you reported however too many bugs >> to deal with them directly in this list. please push them into >> bugzilla so we can deal each of