Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:    Reporting 9 bugs on bugzilla seems like a time-consuming task, so I can't promise anything, but I'll try, probably in a few days. I don't want to be offending. But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. And

Re: Regression bugs

Le 22/11/2010 02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What happens if the function decides to change nothing after all? We have a useless undo step. so if somebody pushes ctrl+z, one step nothing happens? undo machinery could detect and kill empty start-end undo block at the

Re: ViewSource as XHTML?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Second try, now that I read the code: change the converter flag latex to take the form latex=xetex or whatever to indicate the latex flavor that we want. latex will be equivalent to latex=latex. With this, the information does not need to be hardcoded anymore. A

Re: no continuous spell check on beta1, but it works fine on svn

Hi, I tried all of this, starting from scratch. In a different prefix directory, so no conflict with existing lyx-svn... I still get: Language.cpp(204): Default language english not found! /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.2/include/g++-v4/debug/safe_iterator.h:175: error: attempt to

Re: [New layout] Support for AEA.cls (American Economic Association journals)

Hi, I am new to Lyx. Can you tell me how to use the patch to add the new layout to lyx 1.6.7. Thanks Peter

Re: r36496 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

You can use any parameter as long as you turn off the validation. I remember that adding new params to insetlisting was a file format change. But maybe I'm just mixing up things here. I think you are right. IMHO, it should be a file format change, and the revert function should disable the

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: is it enough that we encode the mail (against spambots) or you want fake address? It's OK to encode it, just to not make it appear in clear. fine, its in. pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

I don't want to be offending. But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... ...but I've not heard of it about software bugs. :-) You don't want to be offending, so

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

On 11/28/2010 10:25 PM, Michal wrote: I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use LaTeXType paragraph. Try this: [...] Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to change the look of it to

Re: r36585 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib

Author: uwestoehr New Revision: 36571 Log: - remerge po-files (Sorry Pavel, but I don't know how to work on the translations and fixing typos and shortcut clashes without remerging.) as written in the very first mail, feel free to do remerge after each string change if you are happy to do

Re: r36592 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

Le 29/11/2010 14:30, lasgout...@lyx.org a écrit : Author: lasgouttes Date: Mon Nov 29 14:30:17 2010 New Revision: 36592 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36592 Log: fix #6930: ERT inset should not act on INSET_MODIFY requests directed to someone else This is #6709, actually. JMarc

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote: I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use LaTeXType paragraph. Try this: [...] Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to change the look of it to be

Re: Regression bugs

Le 14/11/2010 01:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit : JMarc, these two seems to have somthing in comon with you ;) : 6768 (at point machinery), 6930 (undo broken) These are fixed now. JMarc

Re: Regression bugs

Le 16/11/2010 11:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Bug 6908 is also related to the AtPoint machinery (JMarc) and the change of LFUN to LFUN_INSET_MODIFY (Abdel). I fixed 6908, and now I should turn to tabular features. Does somebody have a pointer to a bug report or a list thread about

Re: [New layout] Support for AEA.cls (American Economic Association journals)

Dear Peter, It'd be better download the layout file itself from: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/lib/layouts/AEA.layout?rev=34800 Please put the layout file in the layouts directory (In the case of Windows, I think it is located below \Program Files\LyX\.) Koji ps. Please

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

I'll have to think about including it. It's a pretty specialized thing, and seems to me to be very much an expert capability (the way local layout was for a while). I'm not sure. It could be very useful for novices, too. For instance, let's assume that each branch contains the same text,

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

[...] After that, I think the only remaining thing is to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font, changing color to red, etc.) This can all be done in a *.module file in your personal LYXDIR. See the HelpCustomization documentation. That is exactly what I meant.

Re: PATCH for GuiSpellchecker.cpp to simplify on_replacePB_clicked()

Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit : The result is the next patch: 1. start check in updateView only once 2. instead of count_

Re: Regression bugs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 16/11/2010 11:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Bug 6908 is also related to the AtPoint machinery (JMarc) and the change of LFUN to LFUN_INSET_MODIFY (Abdel). I fixed 6908, and now I should turn to tabular features. Does somebody have a pointer to a bug

PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in buffer_funcs.cpp. It does not return the correct result when words in tables are to be counted. E. g. if I duplicate a row with three

Re: Regression bugs

I fixed 6908, and now I should turn to tabular features. Does somebody have a pointer to a bug report or a list thread about that? I failed to find it and I would like to know what the context is. The only context was bug #6908 I guess. I realized that INSET_MODIFY tabular delete-row would

Re: PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in buffer_funcs.cpp. It does not return the correct result when

Re: PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

Am 29.11.2010 um 18:55 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 29.11.2010 um 12:42 schrieb Michal: I don't want to be offending. But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... ...but I've not heard of it about software bugs. :-)

Re: r36604 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: insets mathed

Le 29 nov. 2010 à 22:27, v...@lyx.org a écrit : Log: Rename InsetXXX::contextMenu to InsetXXX::contextMenuName. Now this function doesn't need all the parameters and we split the functionality of choosing which context menu to return, from the functionality of supplying the name for the

Re: PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

Le 29 nov. 2010 à 18:49, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in buffer_funcs.cpp. It does not return the correct result when words in tables are to

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

2010/11/28 Michal ms-li...@ms.sebdan.com:    In this mail I've collected all the bugs with LyX 2.0beta1 I've spotted so far. Overall, the experience has been very pleasant, but there are some glitches worth correcting. My platform is (for now) Win XP SP3 Polish.    If something is unclear,

Question about citation string

Richard, you introduced this string: {%author%[[%author%, ]][[{%editor%[[%editor%, ed., ]]}]]}\%title%\{%journal %[[, {!i!}%journal%{!/i!}]][[{%publisher%[[, %publisher%]][[{%institution %[[, %institution%]]}]]}]]}{%year%[[ (%year%)]]}{%pages%[[, %pages%]]}. how is this creature supposed to be

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: [BUG #6]    Document settings cannot be reverted via undo. Or is it by design? That might be by design. It's rather unwanted that settings are undone and the user doesn't see this happen. this is a regression which works in 1.6, i remember to use it... pavel

Re: Towards beta2 [status #2]

Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, many regressions killed, thanks. these two remain: tabular bugs: 7021 7072 (undoauto completion) end of this week would be good time to make tarball with beta 2, we need to push the latest changes in xe/lua/tex out for testing. anything you want to have in

Re: r36585 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib

Am 29.11.2010 14:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda: as written in the very first mail, feel free to do remerge after each string change if you are happy to do so. the point was to *commit* only de.po. Ah, OK. Then I misunderstood you. regards Uwe

Re: Towards beta2 [status #2]

On 11/29/10 8:14 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: once beta2 is out we should try to sort out bugs which 1) will have killed 2.0 milestone, 2) which need normal fixes 3) and bugs which seem to have non trivial fixes or are prone to introduce new regression while fixing them. once 3) are gone we can

Re: Question about citation string

On 11/29/10 7:41 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard, you introduced this string: {%author%[[%author%, ]][[{%editor%[[%editor%, ed., ]]}]]}\%title%\{%journal %[[, {!i!}%journal%{!/i!}]][[{%publisher%[[, %publisher%]][[{%institution %[[, %institution%]]}]]}]]}{%year%[[ (%year%)]]}{%pages%[[,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Hello On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: [BUG #5]    The dotted line used to mark misspelled words is almost invisible (under some conditions). Is the color/thickness of the line configurable? No, this is hardcoded. Under which conditions is it

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

[BUG #1]    Branch insets override all the rmb menus, so for example the user cannot spellcheck single word inside the branch inset via rmb anymore. This makes working with branches a whole lot harder. This was bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6642. Now fixed in r36604--r36609.

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Ok, so I have reported (some of) the bugs to Trac. Just for reference, I've detailed this process below. [BUG #1] Branch insets override all the rmb menus, so for example the user cannot spellcheck single word inside the branch inset via rmb anymore. This makes working with branches a

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

I have to admit I think it costs not much time to report a bug in LyX's bug tracker. Fortunately, it's not bugzilla. :-) And some of the bugs you reported are easier to fix with example files. Well, I've just reported the bugs (see my other mail on this list). For the record, the

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: >>    Reporting 9 bugs on bugzilla seems like a time-consuming task, so I >> can't promise anything, but I'll try, probably in a few days. > > I don't want to be offending. > > But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task

Re: Regression bugs

Le 22/11/2010 02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What happens if the function decides to change nothing after all? We have a useless undo step. so if somebody pushes ctrl+z, one step nothing happens? undo machinery could detect and kill empty start-end undo block at the

Re: View>Source as XHTML?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Second try, now that I read the code: change the converter flag "latex" to > take the form "latex=xetex" or whatever to indicate the latex flavor that > we want. "latex" will be equivalent to "latex=latex". > > With this, the information does not need to be hardcoded

Re: no continuous spell check on beta1, but it works fine on svn

Hi, I tried all of this, starting from scratch. In a different prefix directory, so no conflict with existing lyx-svn... I still get: Language.cpp(204): Default language "english" not found! /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.2/include/g++-v4/debug/safe_iterator.h:175: error: attempt to

Re: [New layout] Support for AEA.cls (American Economic Association journals)

Hi, I am new to Lyx. Can you tell me how to use the patch to add the new layout to lyx 1.6.7. Thanks Peter

Re: r36496 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

>>> You can use any parameter as long as you turn off the validation. >> >> I remember that adding new params to insetlisting was a file format >> change. But maybe I'm just mixing up things here. > > I think you are right. IMHO, it should be a file format change, and the > revert function should

Re: I love GPL, what about you?

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote: > > is it enough that we encode the mail (against spambots) or you want fake > address? > > It's OK to encode it, just to not make it appear in clear. fine, its in. pavel

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

> I don't want to be offending. > > But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. > And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. > Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... > ...but I've not heard of it about software bugs. :-) You don't want to be

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

On 11/28/2010 10:25 PM, Michal wrote: I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use "LaTeXType paragraph". Try this: [...] Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to change the look of it

Re: r36585 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib

> Author: uwestoehr > New Revision: 36571 > > Log: > - remerge po-files (Sorry Pavel, but I don't know how to work on the > translations and fixing typos and shortcut clashes without remerging.) as written in the very first mail, feel free to do remerge after each string change if you are happy

Re: r36592 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/insets

Le 29/11/2010 14:30, lasgout...@lyx.org a écrit : Author: lasgouttes Date: Mon Nov 29 14:30:17 2010 New Revision: 36592 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/36592 Log: fix #6930: ERT inset should not act on INSET_MODIFY requests directed to someone else This is #6709, actually. JMarc

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

On 2010-11-29, Michal wrote: >> I've fixed this, in the sense that you can now use "LaTeXType >> paragraph". Try this: >> [...] > Thank you for your help! I guess I'll have to wait until the next > beta comes out then. After that, I think the only remaining thing is to > change the look of

Re: Regression bugs

Le 14/11/2010 01:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit : JMarc, these two seems to have somthing in comon with you ;) : 6768 (at point machinery), 6930 (undo broken) These are fixed now. JMarc

Re: Regression bugs

Le 16/11/2010 11:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : Bug 6908 is also related to the AtPoint machinery (JMarc) and the change of LFUN to LFUN_INSET_MODIFY (Abdel). I fixed 6908, and now I should turn to tabular features. Does somebody have a pointer to a bug report or a list thread about

Re: [New layout] Support for AEA.cls (American Economic Association journals)

Dear Peter, It'd be better download the layout file itself from: http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/lib/layouts/AEA.layout?rev=34800 Please put the layout file in the "layouts" directory (In the case of Windows, I think it is located below "\Program Files\LyX\".) Koji ps. Please

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

> I'll have to think about including it. It's a pretty specialized > thing, and seems to me to be very much > an "expert" capability (the way local layout was for a while). I'm not sure. It could be very useful for novices, too. For instance, let's assume that each branch contains the same

Re: Suggestion - preamble inset

> > [...] After that, I think the only remaining thing is > > to change the look of it to be more like ERT (typewriter font, > > changing color to red, etc.) > > This can all be done in a *.module file in your personal LYXDIR. See > the "Help>Customization" documentation. That is exactly what

Re: PATCH for GuiSpellchecker.cpp to simplify on_replacePB_clicked()

Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: >> >>> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit : The result is the next patch: 1. start check in updateView only once 2. instead

Re: Regression bugs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/11/2010 11:55, Vincent van Ravesteijn a écrit : >> Bug 6908 is also related to the AtPoint machinery (JMarc) and the >> change of LFUN to LFUN_INSET_MODIFY (Abdel). > > I fixed 6908, and now I should turn to tabular features. Does somebody > have a pointer to a

PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: > Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: > > While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in > buffer_funcs.cpp. > It does not return the correct result when words in tables are to be counted. > E. g. if I duplicate a row with

Re: Regression bugs

> I fixed 6908, and now I should turn to tabular features. Does somebody > have a pointer to a bug report or a list thread about that? I failed to > find it and I would like to know what the context is. > The only context was bug #6908 I guess. I realized that "INSET_MODIFY tabular delete-row"

Re: PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> >> While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in >> buffer_funcs.cpp. >> It does not return the correct

Re: PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

Am 29.11.2010 um 18:55 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> >>> Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: >>> >>> While testing I found a problem with the function

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Am 29.11.2010 um 12:42 schrieb Michal: >> I don't want to be offending. >> >> But honestly, fixing bugs is a time-consuming task too. >> And I've not seen any bug disappearing by mentioning. >> Some bugs are resorting when the sun light is raising... >> ...but I've not heard of it about

Re: r36604 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: insets mathed

Le 29 nov. 2010 à 22:27, v...@lyx.org a écrit : > Log: > Rename InsetXXX::contextMenu to InsetXXX::contextMenuName. Now this function > doesn't need all the parameters and we split the functionality of choosing > which context menu to return, from the functionality of supplying the name > for

Re: PATCH for src/buffer_funcs.cpp

Le 29 nov. 2010 à 18:49, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 29.11.2010 um 18:26 schrieb Stephan Witt: > >> Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt: >> >> While testing I found a problem with the function countWords() in >> buffer_funcs.cpp. >> It does not return the correct result when words in

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

2010/11/28 Michal : >    In this mail I've collected all the bugs with LyX 2.0beta1 I've > spotted so far. Overall, the experience has been very pleasant, but > there are some glitches worth correcting. My platform is (for now) Win > XP SP3 Polish. > >    If something is

Question about citation string

Richard, you introduced this string: "{%author%[[%author%, ]][[{%editor%[[%editor%, ed., ]]}]]}\"%title%\"{%journal" "%[[, {!!}%journal%{!!}]][[{%publisher%[[, %publisher%]][[{%institution" "%[[, %institution%]]}]]}]]}{%year%[[ (%year%)]]}{%pages%[[, %pages%]]}." how is this creature supposed to

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > [BUG #6] > >    Document settings cannot be reverted via "undo". Or is it by design? > > That might be by design. It's rather unwanted that settings are undone > and the user doesn't see this happen. this is a regression which works in 1.6, i remember to use

Re: Towards beta2 [status #2]

Pavel Sanda wrote: > hi, > many regressions killed, thanks. these two remain: > tabular bugs: 7021 > > 7072 (undo completion) end of this week would be good time to make tarball with beta 2, we need to push the latest changes in xe/lua/tex out for testing. anything you want to have in

Re: r36585 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib

Am 29.11.2010 14:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda: as written in the very first mail, feel free to do remerge after each string change if you are happy to do so. the point was to *commit* only de.po. Ah, OK. Then I misunderstood you. regards Uwe

Re: Towards beta2 [status #2]

On 11/29/10 8:14 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: once beta2 is out we should try to sort out bugs which 1) will have killed 2.0 milestone, 2) which need normal fixes 3) and bugs which seem to have non trivial fixes or are prone to introduce new regression while fixing them. once 3) are gone we can

Re: Question about citation string

On 11/29/10 7:41 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard, you introduced this string: "{%author%[[%author%, ]][[{%editor%[[%editor%, ed., ]]}]]}\"%title%\"{%journal" "%[[, {!!}%journal%{!!}]][[{%publisher%[[, %publisher%]][[{%institution" "%[[, %institution%]]}]]}]]}{%year%[[ (%year%)]]}{%pages%[[,

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Hello On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> [BUG #5] >>    The dotted line used to mark misspelled words is almost invisible >> (under some conditions). Is the color/thickness of the line >> configurable? >> > > No, this is hardcoded. Under which

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

> > [BUG #1] > >    Branch insets "override" all the rmb menus, so for example the > > user cannot spellcheck single word inside the branch inset via rmb > > anymore. This makes working with branches a whole lot harder. > > This was bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6642. > > Now fixed in

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

Ok, so I have reported (some of) the bugs to Trac. Just for reference, I've detailed this process below. > [BUG #1] > Branch insets "override" all the rmb menus, so for example the > user cannot spellcheck single word inside the branch inset via rmb > anymore. This makes working with

Re: LyX 2.0 - some bugs

> I have to admit I think it costs not much time to report a bug in > LyX's bug tracker. Fortunately, it's not bugzilla. :-) > And some of the bugs you reported are easier to fix with example > files. Well, I've just reported the bugs (see my other mail on this list). For the record, the