Re: Status on Mac with El Capitan

Le 06/01/2016 11:09, Kornel Benko a écrit : It would be nice if we could converge to the same algorithm in the two build systems. If you disagree on what autotools do, we can discuss adaptations. In cmake it is an option, which is set _before_ we know the compiler. Actually it is the same in

Re: Status on Mac with El Capitan

Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 um 10:26:24, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 05/01/2016 18:04, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> Isn't LYX_ENABLE_CXX11=ON the default for clang? > > > > By default it is OFF for any compiler. > > > >> I have to use —-disable-cxx11 with auto tools. >

Re: Status on Mac with El Capitan

Le 05/01/2016 18:04, Kornel Benko a écrit : Isn't LYX_ENABLE_CXX11=ON the default for clang? By default it is OFF for any compiler. I have to use —-disable-cxx11 with auto tools. Why is it working with cmake for you? Where is your Qt5 framework? What compiler are you using? Kornel, it

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > (although I still don't understand why). I get another instance of the > same error though when using a build directory instead of an in-source > build. Recipe? P

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 06.01.2016 um 14:23 schrieb Kornel Benko: Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 um 14:15:22, schrieb Stephan Witt Am 06.01.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Peter Kümmel : Am 03.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Georg Baum: So far we have never released any 64bit windows

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 03.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Georg Baum: So far we have never released any 64bit windows binary. This is fine, since 64bit windows can execute 32bit binaries, and nobody complained yet about LyX hitting the 32bit memory limit (around 3.5 GB on windows). I would not switch to 64bit at this

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 03.01.2016 um 17:09 schrieb Kornel Benko: It creates LyX22-2.2.0-win32.zip. Probably not an installer like used in windows. Yes, only the files generated my "make install". I added "make install" to the script, and the NSIS installer should use the files in LYX_INSTALLED/ Kornel

Re: Raspberry Pi 2 scroll speed

Le 06/01/2016 13:25, Peter Kümmel a écrit : Am 05.01.2016 um 12:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 20/12/2015 15:07, Peter Kümmel a écrit : Recently I gave away the computer which I've used when I was very busy on LyX. It was an Athlon XP 2GHz singlecore. I was interested how the hardware

Re: Questions for Uwe?

4. Do we also want to try releasing an installer built with mingw? (Does that build an installer? or just LyX?) It builds just LyX. Building an installer needs a built LyX, it should not matter whether it was built by MSVC or mingw (except for the MSVC prerequisites, these are not needed to be

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 um 14:15:22, schrieb Stephan Witt > Am 06.01.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > > > > > > > > Am 03.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> > >> So far we have never released any 64bit windows binary. This is fine, since

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 06.01.2016 um 14:15 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 06.01.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Peter Kümmel : Am 03.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Georg Baum: So far we have never released any 64bit windows binary. This is fine, since 64bit windows can execute 32bit binaries, and nobody

Re: Raspberry Pi 2 scroll speed

Am 05.01.2016 um 12:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 20/12/2015 15:07, Peter Kümmel a écrit : Recently I gave away the computer which I've used when I was very busy on LyX. It was an Athlon XP 2GHz singlecore. I was interested how the hardware progress looks like from the LyX perspective,

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 06.01.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Peter Kümmel : > > > > Am 03.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Georg Baum: >> >> So far we have never released any 64bit windows binary. This is fine, since >> 64bit windows can execute 32bit binaries, and nobody complained yet about >> LyX hitting

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 um 14:27:24, schrieb Peter Kümmel > Am 03.01.2016 um 17:09 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > It creates LyX22-2.2.0-win32.zip. > > Probably not an installer like used in windows. > > Yes, only the files generated my "make install". > > I added "make

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Le 06/01/2016 14:23, Kornel Benko a écrit : Is there a reason why we cannot use int64_t instead of long long? Or maybe just use size_t and ptrdiff_t? I suspect these are the ones we really need. JMarc

Re: Raspberry Pi 2 scroll speed

Am 06.01.2016 um 14:45 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 06/01/2016 13:25, Peter Kümmel a écrit : Am 05.01.2016 um 12:28 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: Le 20/12/2015 15:07, Peter Kümmel a écrit : Recently I gave away the computer which I've used when I was very busy on LyX. It was an Athlon

Re: Raspberry Pi 2 scroll speed

Le 06/01/2016 16:54, Peter Kümmel a écrit : Is this 2.1 or 2.2? In release mode? The one shipped by Ubuntu, so I assume some 2.1 version. Then hopefully the performance with 2.2 will be better. JMarc

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 06.01.2016 um 14:35 schrieb Kornel Benko: Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 um 14:27:24, schrieb Peter Kümmel Am 03.01.2016 um 17:09 schrieb Kornel Benko: It creates LyX22-2.2.0-win32.zip. Probably not an installer like used in windows. Yes, only the files generated my

Re: Questions for Uwe?

Am 06.01.2016 um 13:32 schrieb Peter Kümmel: 4. Do we also want to try releasing an installer built with mingw? (Does that build an installer? or just LyX?) It builds just LyX. Building an installer needs a built LyX, it should not matter whether it was built by MSVC or mingw (except for the

Re: Can anyone build with mingw?

Am 28.12.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Ah, the cmakebin variable is not set, a rest of the bot script. Replacing the variable by cmake should fix it. committed this. Yes this was the problem. There seem to be several unset variables. Can we use set -u with /bin/sh or is that

Re: [PATCH] Use \AA and \aa for "latin letter A with ring above".

Guenter Milde wrote: > Without special code for tex2lyx, \AA and \aa is the better > lib/unicodesymbols replacement, as there is a fallback for \r{A}, \r{a} > but not for \aa, \AA. > > With the special code, it is a matter of taste - maybe best decided by a > native speaker of a Scandinavian

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> (although I still don't understand why). I get another instance of the > >> same error though when using a build directory instead of an in-source > >> build. > > > > Recipe? P > > Starting from the top level source

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >Sadly, moving cursor in paragraph is considerably slower than > >in my current 2.0 build :( > > And how does this compare to a 2.1 build? > > Could you provide a profile log for 2.2 being slow? Ok, I made two profiles for sysprof. The way to reproduce: my

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> (although I still don't understand why). I get another instance of the >> same error though when using a build directory instead of an in-source >> build. > > Recipe? P Starting from the top level source directory: ./autogen.sh mkdir buildtest cd

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 03/01/2016 11:04, Georg Baum a écrit : >> >> Really? The amount of code changes is big, and I cannot see from the >> patch that it has no influence on the .tex input/output or mathml/xhtml >> output. If it can not be 100% guaranteed that only the display is changed >>