Two issues regarding small icons for 2.2.0

We have two issues regarding small icons: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9806 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9897 From what I understand, #9806 depends on #9897. Is anyone planning to work on these issues for 2.2.0? Do we view them as critical for 2.2.0? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP

Remove date external template for 2.2.0?

There have been various discussions about how the date external material template is useless. I think it was kept around mostly just to be an example of what could be done. Two questions: 1. Do we want to remove it? 2. Do we want to remove it for 2.2.0? Note that this is #9948. Scott

Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

make distcheck fails for some people and passes for others. It fails for me. I think it passes for Pavel now that Georg's fix was committed. We have not gotten to the root of why make distcheck fails for some. See this thread for previous efforts:

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:11:27PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 02/17/2016 09:09 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 18/02/2016 01:58, Richard Heck a écrit : > >> On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >>> Guillaume Munch wrote: > The attached patch copies code from the source panel,

Re: 9940: why does VCS need to do something special if toggling read only?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > It is not ideal to have buffer code call vcs code that calls a buffer > function Haha, yes, returning message string to encode both success and message is bad and does not allow to react approprietly on the level of buffer for more complex situations. I guess I'm the one

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

On 02/17/2016 09:09 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 18/02/2016 01:58, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> Guillaume Munch wrote: The attached patch copies code from the source panel, so it is safe. >>> I don't know what is the current beta policy, if Scott

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

Le 18/02/2016 01:58, Richard Heck a écrit : On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Guillaume Munch wrote: The attached patch copies code from the source panel, so it is safe. I don't know what is the current beta policy, if Scott is fine with that it has my +1. Tested? If so, has my

lyx-cvs messages: show file names changed

Would anyone else find it useful if the lyx-cvs messages showed the file names that were changed at the beginning of a message? One example is that I would often like to know if a commit is documentation only or if there is another change that I would like to take a look at. What I would

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: >> The attached patch copies code from the source panel, so it is safe. > I don't know what is the current beta policy, if Scott is fine with that it > has my +1. Tested? If so, has my +1, too. (No time myself right now.) rh

Re: 9940: why does VCS need to do something special if toggling read only?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:37:42PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Stephan Witt wrote: > > > As a summary I see more approaches: > > > 1. Stay with current architecture and hack it little bit so readonly > > > status change is allowed only for git (and maybe CVS?) case. > > > 2. Decouple ui read

Re: Bug in Insert > Special Character > Symbols in beta1 & 2

Am 17.02.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Liviu Andronic: I've finally discovered where the problem arose. Under Document settings > Language I had somehow set the Other button and chosen Unicode (utf8) and then under Language package chosen none. Changing both settings to default resolves the problem.

Re: State of master and release process

Am 17.02.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: tars from current master are there: Now everything works for me - the .gz and the .xz file is correct (opened with WinRar). regards Uwe

Re: Bug in Insert > Special Character > Symbols in beta1 & 2

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 17/02/2016 6:12 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:11:54AM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Parsloe >>> wrote:

Re: 9940: why does VCS need to do something special if toggling read only?

Stephan Witt wrote: > > As a summary I see more approaches: > > 1. Stay with current architecture and hack it little bit so readonly > > status change is allowed only for git (and maybe CVS?) case. > > 2. Decouple ui read only and file read-only status. > > 3. Decouple file locking and locking

Re: Bug in Insert > Special Character > Symbols in beta1 & 2

On 17/02/2016 6:12 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:11:54AM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Insert > Special Character > Symbols displays the Basic Latin selection of symbols on my system. I

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

Guillaume Munch wrote: > The attached patch copies code from the source panel, so it is safe. I don't know what is the current beta policy, if Scott is fine with that it has my +1. Pavel

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

On 2016-02-17, Guillaume Munch wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit --] > Le 17/02/2016 19:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> Joel Kulesza wrote: >>> My suggestion is to change the default font of the Settings->Preamble text >>> box to a fixed-width font because the content is effectively

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

Le 17/02/2016 19:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Joel Kulesza wrote: My suggestion is to change the default font of the Settings->Preamble text box to a fixed-width font because the content is effectively code. This change should improve readability for those that make extensive use of the preamble.

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

Georg Baum wrote: > - doubles consume 64bit in memory but 80bit in processor registers (on x86 This was the missing piece of the puzzle, now makes sense. P

Re: State of master and release process

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:31:47AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking >> >> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip,

Re: 9940: why does VCS need to do something special if toggling read only?

Am 17.02.2016 um 20:58 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:34:04PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> Scott Kostyshak wrote: Regarding #9940, why does VCS need to do something special for buffer-toggle-read-only ? >>> >>> Read-only

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >> >> > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations >> >> I cannot reproduce using these flags with gcc 4.9.2. > > Shouldn't matter IMHO, but running 32 bit here. That might explain it. I am on 64bit. >> >> Pavel,

Re: State of master and release process

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:31:47AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking > >> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip, two open-source file > >> archivers for Windows, and ran into the same 100-char

Re: 9940: why does VCS need to do something special if toggling read only?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:34:04PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Regarding #9940, why does VCS need to do something special for > > > buffer-toggle-read-only ? > > > > Read-only status is currently connected with locking features of VCS > >

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

Joel Kulesza wrote: > My suggestion is to change the default font of the Settings->Preamble text > box to a fixed-width font because the content is effectively code. This > change should improve readability for those that make extensive use of the > preamble. > > Going a step further with the

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Georg Baum wrote: > >> No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination > >> with optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build). > >> Which compiler switches do you use? > > > > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2

Re: State of master and release process

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking >> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip, two open-source file >> archivers for Windows, and ran into the same 100-char truncation >> issue. However, no such issues with Total Commander's

Re: 9940: why does VCS need to do something special if toggling read only?

On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 07:34:04PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Regarding #9940, why does VCS need to do something special for > > buffer-toggle-read-only ? > > Read-only status is currently connected with locking features of VCS > (RCS,SVN, maybe CVS, not git).

Re: State of master and release process

Le 17/02/2016 17:51, Liviu Andronic a écrit : On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Georg Baum wrote: is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There is a problem with extracting the tar on Windows, so I have just sent Uwe a zip file

Re: State of master and release process

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >> is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There >> is a problem with extracting the tar on Windows, so I have just sent Uwe >> a zip file containing the same files that the tar contains.

Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

LyX Developers, I recently submitted an enhancement request through the bug tracker and it was suggested I post here to initiate discussion on it. The TRAC ticket number is #9966 . My suggestion is to change the default font of the Settings->Preamble text

Re: [LyX/master] Add missing boost files to source package

Am 16.02.2016 um 20:08 schrieb Georg Baum: Peter Kümmel wrote: Am 15.02.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Georg Baum: Done . Thanks. What about the unused files libs/regex/regex.vcproj, libs/signals/signals.vcproj, libs/regex/src/icu.cpp, libs/regex/src/usinstances.cpp and

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Le 17/02/2016 07:56, Stephan Witt a écrit : Dear Patrick, dear Stephan, Could you try the attached patch in C++11 mode? It doesn’t help, unfortunately. You are not answering my question :) The question was "does it allow to compile .m files in C++11 mode?" As far as your other compile