Re: make lyxdist fails: No rule to make target 'Change.h'

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:37:37AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 14/06/2016 01:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:17:27PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:21AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > > Le 14/06/2016 00:12, Scott Kostyshak

Re: make lyxdist fails: No rule to make target 'Change.h'

Le 14/06/2016 01:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:17:27PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:21AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 14/06/2016 00:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : To reproduce, on a clean repo do the following: ./autogen.sh &&

Re: make lyxdist fails: No rule to make target 'Change.h'

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:17:27PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:21AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 14/06/2016 00:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > To reproduce, on a clean repo do the following: > > > > > > ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist > >

Re: make lyxdist fails: No rule to make target 'Change.h'

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:21AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 14/06/2016 00:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > To reproduce, on a clean repo do the following: > > > > ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist > > > > I get: > > > > $ ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist > >

Re: make lyxdist fails: No rule to make target 'Change.h'

Le 14/06/2016 00:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : To reproduce, on a clean repo do the following: ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist I get: $ ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist make[3]: Entering directory '/home/scott/lyxbuilds/master/repo/src/support' make[3]: *** No rule to

make lyxdist fails: No rule to make target 'Change.h'

To reproduce, on a clean repo do the following: ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist I get: $ ./autogen.sh && ./configure && make lyxdist make[3]: Entering directory '/home/scott/lyxbuilds/master/repo/src/support' make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'Change.h', needed by 'distdir'.

Re: One official build system?

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:29:34PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > By the way, I saw your comment just above the definition of the lyxdist > > target, which you introduced in 2010 (d407a15c): > > > > > > #Wait some time for bumping automake 1.11, which can use

Re: One official build system?

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016 um 15:36:37, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:40:59PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I'm still not sure what the implications of

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 21:54, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Starting from 2.3, LyX will require a C++11 compiler, and g++ 4.6 fails (it seems) at a feature as elementary as generating a default move constructor, even when told so explicitly (which we cannot really blame it for, given that

Re: [LyX/master] Cmake build: Check for QPA_XCB when QT_USES_X11 is known

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:09:18AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 01:57:30, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > I tried xmingw-script on current master

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 21:40, Stephan Witt a écrit : gcc-Version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-17) (GCC) IMO it’s not dead and end of life is 2020-11-30 I do not know what can be done at the LyX level for CentOS 6. It seems that it is very easy to obtain gcc 4.8 on CentOS 6 provided one has access to

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Stephan Witt wrote: > IMO it?s not dead and end of life is 2020-11-30 CentOs/Redhat has extremely long LTS (e.g. clusters around here still have gcc 4.4). On the other hand no one sane would use it for GUI development, it's more for server/clusters deployment. So we shouldn't really strive to

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Starting from 2.3, LyX will require a C++11 compiler, and g++ 4.6 fails > (it seems) at a feature as elementary as generating a default move > constructor, even when told so explicitly (which we cannot really blame > it for, given that it does not claim C++11 compliance in

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Am 13.06.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Guillaume Munch : > > Le 13/06/2016 20:50, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> Then if we are dropping g++ 4.6, does anyone know whether it makes >>> sense >> >> Sorry I might got lost somewhere in the threads around. What reasons >>

Re: Why is the filesystemencoding needed for \origin lyx2lyx?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:38:07PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:21:48PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > >> Hi Enrico, > >> > >> you added an encoding conversion in lyx2lyx here: > >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/a0afd345/lyxgit > >> >

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 20:50, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Then if we are dropping g++ 4.6, does anyone know whether it makes sense Sorry I might got lost somewhere in the threads around. What reasons do we have for dropping gcc 4.6? Starting from 2.3, LyX will require a C++11

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Then if we are dropping g++ 4.6, does anyone know whether it makes sense Sorry I might got lost somewhere in the threads around. What reasons do we have for dropping gcc 4.6? Pavel

Re: Why is the filesystemencoding needed for \origin lyx2lyx?

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:21:48PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Hi Enrico, >> >> you added an encoding conversion in lyx2lyx here: >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/a0afd345/lyxgit >> >> Can you please explain why this is needed, but not on windows? > >

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 12:53, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 13/06/2016 à 10:14, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 12/06/2016 09:29, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: I do not clearly see the situation wrt gcc 4.6. Which are the distributions that currently lack gcc > 4.6 ? this is ubuntu

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 à 18:01, Kornel Benko a écrit : I don't understand, why _my_ clang 3.6 accepts parameter '-std=c++14'. I am not sure that I understand your question. Here example (without source file) gcc4.8 # g++ -std=c++14 g++: error: unrecognized command line option

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 17:49:07, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 13/06/2016 à 17:34, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> The posting you refer to seems to imply that it is a C++14 problem. What > >> about enforcing C++11 mode instead? > > > > Hm, yes. But if we want to support

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 à 17:34, Kornel Benko a écrit : The posting you refer to seems to imply that it is a C++14 problem. What about enforcing C++11 mode instead? Hm, yes. But if we want to support 'std::make_unique' we need C++14 test. At least, that was my impression while working with 4.8 and 5.3.1

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 16:22:56, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 13/06/2016 à 14:11, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > I had no problems with clang 3.3. But using clang 3.6 with installed libs > > from gcc4.8 > > has problems while compiling cstdio. > > According to page >

LyX 2.1.5 Tarballs

The tarballs for the release of LyX 2.1.5 can be found here: ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.1/2.1.5/ Please prepare binaries. I will be at a conference all week. I'll have email access, of course, but I won't be at the right IP address for uploading files to ftp.lyx.org. So I will

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 à 16:50, Stephan Witt a écrit : Am 13.06.2016 um 16:25 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 13/06/2016 à 14:27, Stephan Witt a écrit : Stephan, I'd be interested to know what clang version is returned by the Apple version. I hope it does not return the XCode

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Am 13.06.2016 um 16:25 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 13/06/2016 à 14:27, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>> Stephan, I'd be interested to know what clang version is returned by the >>> Apple version. I hope it does not return the XCode version. >> >> Why not? >> >> checking

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 à 14:27, Stephan Witt a écrit : Stephan, I'd be interested to know what clang version is returned by the Apple version. I hope it does not return the XCode version. Why not? checking whether the compiler is clang... yes checking for clang version... 7.3.0 Because I'd like to

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 à 14:11, Kornel Benko a écrit : I had no problems with clang 3.3. But using clang 3.6 with installed libs from gcc4.8 has problems while compiling cstdio. According to page http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17775390/clang-3-3-in-c1y-mode-cannot-parse-cstdio-header this snipped

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Am 13.06.2016 um 13:53 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 13/06/2016 à 10:14, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> Le 12/06/2016 09:29, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >>> Guillaume Munch wrote: >> I do not clearly see the situation wrt gcc 4.6. Which are the >> distributions that

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 13:53:43, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 13/06/2016 à 10:14, Guillaume Munch a écrit : > > Le 12/06/2016 09:29, Pavel Sanda a écrit : > >> Guillaume Munch wrote: > > I do not clearly see the situation wrt gcc 4.6. Which are the > >

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 13/06/2016 à 10:14, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 12/06/2016 09:29, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: I do not clearly see the situation wrt gcc 4.6. Which are the distributions that currently lack gcc > 4.6 ? this is ubuntu 12.04.p I see. I has assumed g++-4.7 was there

Re: Shorcut clashing Menu vs dialog in Qt5.6

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 10:11:04, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > Le 11/06/2016 22:27, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2016 um 22:08:41, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien > > > > >> But does this mean that shortcuts will

Re: [LyX/2.2.x] * Math.lyx : add few maxima examples to ch. 23.1.

  Original Message   From: Pavel Sanda Sent: Montag, 13. Juni 2016 04:01 > Sure, but I asked you about those changes long time ago and you never replied. I apologize. In such cases, please resend an email directly to me. Sometimes the amount of Lyx messages is too large so that some slip

Re: [LyX/master] Cmake build: Check for QPA_XCB when QT_USES_X11 is known

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 01:57:30, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:27:24PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > I tried xmingw-script on current master but it does not succeed for me. > > > > > > I get the following: > > > > >

Re: [LyX/master] Cmake build: Check for QPA_XCB when QT_USES_X11 is known

Am Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 01:55:28, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:15:53AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2016 um 20:50:43, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 07:30:55PM -0400, Scott

Re: Annoying terminal messages: QXcbClipboard: SelectionRequest too old

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 02:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:48:18PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 21:28:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] unique_ptr and some clean-up

Le 12/06/2016 09:29, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: I do not clearly see the situation wrt gcc 4.6. Which are the distributions that currently lack gcc > 4.6 ? this is ubuntu 12.04.p I see. I has assumed g++-4.7 was there since there is gcc-4.7. How does clang fare? it has

Re: Shorcut clashing Menu vs dialog in Qt5.6

Le 11/06/2016 22:27, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2016 um 22:08:41, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien But does this mean that shortcuts will be different between Qt5 and Qt4, unless LyX 2.3 comes with Qt5 only ? No, the shortcuts do not depend on QT.

Re: [LyX/2.2.x] * Math.lyx : add few maxima examples to ch. 23.1.

Le 13/06/2016 00:06, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Moreover, and also on general, it is important to keep all language versions in sync. There is no reason that new info is not in e.g. the Spanish version. Uwe, if the changes are inserted via change tracking so I can found them easily, I can take care

Re: Annoying terminal messages: QXcbClipboard: SelectionRequest too old

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:48:18PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 21:28:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > Does anyone else often get these annoying messages when running LyX from