The tar balls are here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/lyx-2.3.0beta1/
I will send another email as soon as binaries are up.
Please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball) and basic
functionality on your platform, and let us know how it goes.
I'm currently planning to
El 13.08.2017 a las 15:04, Uwe Stöhr escribió:
damn, I repaired this already few months ago. I also complained about
this automatic permission removal at my hoster...
it turned out that the Documentation folder even got lost.
I set it now again and updated the manuals to LyX 2.2.3:
Jean-Pierre,
I use a similar setup, just BasicTeX because of the smaller foot print
with additional packages loaded as needed and WIndows7 and Windows10
virtual machines in the latest Virtual Box.
buffer-view.sgvz is displayed as icon in the text without issues as are
all the others.
I don't
On 08/14/2017 09:08 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> Another option I’d like to propose would be a dedicated LFUN for opening
> the example file to be opened like the help files which
> can be used to point the file open dialog to the system examples folder
> when fired without argument. This LFUN may
Am 14.08.2017 um 14:46 schrieb Guenter Milde :
>
> On 2017-08-14, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 14.08.2017 um 09:43 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
>> :
>
>>> A French user complains sadly about a couple of problems with LyX
>
>>> His conf: iMac 2011
On 2017-08-14, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 14.08.2017 um 09:43 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> :
>> A French user complains sadly about a couple of problems with LyX
>> His conf: iMac 2011 (OSX 10.12.5), MacTeX (May 24th, 2017), LyX 2.2.3,
>> virtual Windows versions
Am 14.08.2017 um 09:43 schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
:
>
> Hello Stephan
>
> A French user complains sadly about a couple of problems with LyX (first
> experience).
Hello Jean-Pierre
>
> His conf:
> iMac 2011 (OSX 10.12.5), MacTeX (May 24th, 2017), LyX 2.2.3,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 01:28:54AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Good point. So we should get rid of the ones you marked with ??? ?
Done at 9ce1a337.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:55:56AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 01:22:08AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > El 03.08.2017 a las 00:03, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
> >
> > > Should this be beta1?
> >
> > This depends on you, either alpha2 or beta 1.
>
> Ah good point. Even
Dear all,
Please do not make any more commits to the master branch until after
I push the beta1 tag.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
10 matches
Mail list logo