Re: Patches for Python scripts

2021-01-31 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 12:39, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 04:22:39AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 12:26, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 05:31:05AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 02:31,

Re: [LyX/master] make distcheck broken after old installer purge.

2021-01-31 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 04:31:31PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > commit dded4c8ab548892d86480d11541ad9a350e4c450 > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Sun Jan 31 16:32:51 2021 +0100 > > make distcheck broken after old installer purge. JMarc, are you able to somehow check whether jenkins works? I am

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-31 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 01:33:21PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Sunday, January 31, 2021 12:12:41 PM WET Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Does the attached patch work for you? > > Yes. Without the patch "make check" fails, with the patch it works. Committed. > Thank you. :-) Thanks for

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-31 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 12:12:41 PM WET Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Does the attached patch work for you? Yes. Without the patch "make check" fails, with the patch it works. Thank you. :-) -- José Abílio-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-31 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:20:20AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > So I suspect that to fix this in the autotools framework we need to link with > libz on the check stage. How to this is out of my abilities. :-) Does the attached patch work for you? -- Enrico diff --git

Re: Patches for Python scripts

2021-01-31 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 04:22:39AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 12:26, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 05:31:05AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 02:31, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > > > > So, it seems that you have

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-31 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 10:04:13 AM WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > So the summary is that the compile only fails on the "make check" stage. The > package built fine. After this clue I searched on the logs of all architectures and the error is also present there. Comparing the output with

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-31 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 6:56:31 AM WET Liviu Andronic wrote: > I've tried building Alpha 1 on Bionic but compilation ends up with this > error: > > g++ -fPIC -O2 -std=c++17 -std=c++17 -g -O2 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,defs

Re: LyX 2.4.0-alpha1

2021-01-31 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, January 31, 2021 6:56:31 AM WET Liviu Andronic wrote: > Any idea what's wrong? I'm not sure if maybe there are some new > dependencies for 2.4 I should take into account or if maybe a specific > compiler flag is needed. > > > Thank you, > Liviu I am looking into it. Note that I am

Re: DocBook to ePub

2021-01-31 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 30.01.2021 um 04:56 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier : > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 at 01:30, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 29.01.2021 um 18:38 schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier : > > > > Dear list, > > > > As promised, I started working on ePub output, building upon the new > > DocBook output. > > > > Here is a