PDF View Problems with 2.4dev

Hi, all, I've been using current master for work lately, and I'm getting frequent errors when viewing a fairly simple master-child document. The structure is: TITLE ETC INCLUDE CHILD, which has most of the content BIBLIOGRAPHY On viewing (usually, this is master-buffer-view, from the child), I

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On 2/11/21 11:19 PM, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:52, Thibaut Cuvelier > wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:05, José Abílio Matos > wrote: > > On Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:02:19 PM WET Yu Jin wrote: >

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:52, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:05, José Abílio Matos wrote: > >> On Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:02:19 PM WET Yu Jin wrote: >> > Will be pointless imo, it's not the script's fault that python is not >> found. >> > The fault is to be searched

Re: FindAdv, request for comments

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 04:30:32PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:38:15 -0500 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > That is, without a unit test > > framework and an extensive set of unit tests, I would be hesitant to > > change anything. > > Even with unit tests, you cannot be

Windows installer: add version in all shortcuts

Hi Eugene, I proposed in another discussion to add the version in all shortcuts created by the installer, for specifically the case where the user has several versions of LyX (or just updated, in which case there will be a delay before the new shortcut gets into the search cache of the Start

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 22:09, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 2/11/21 4:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Thursday, February 11, 2021 7:53:36 PM WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > >> I would guess it is os::find_python_binary. But it has not been touched > in a > >> long time. > >> > >> It's

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 22:03, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < > tcuvel...@lyx.org>: > >> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:05, Richard Kimberly Heck >> wrote: >> >>> On 2/11/21 11:02 AM, Yu Jin wrote: >>> >>> Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On 2/11/21 4:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Thursday, February 11, 2021 7:53:36 PM WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: I would guess it is os::find_python_binary. But it has not been touched in a long time. It's highly likely that it does. On Windows, the first thing this function checks is `py

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On 2/11/21 4:04 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote: On Thursday, February 11, 2021 7:53:36 PM WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: I would guess it is os::find_python_binary. But it has not been touched in a long time. It's highly likely that it does. On Windows, the first thing this function checks is `py

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thursday, February 11, 2021 7:53:36 PM WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > I would guess it is os::find_python_binary. But it has not been touched in a > long time. > > It's highly likely that it does. On Windows, the first thing this function > checks is `py -3`, but I haven't seen any py binary in

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 20:53 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < tcuvel...@lyx.org>: > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:05, Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > >> On 2/11/21 11:02 AM, Yu Jin wrote: >> >> Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < >> rikih...@lyx.org>: >> >>> On

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 20:05 Uhr schrieb José Abílio Matos < jama...@lyx.org>: > On Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:02:19 PM WET Yu Jin wrote: > > Will be pointless imo, it's not the script's fault that python is not > found. > > The fault is to be searched in the part of code which adds the

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:05, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 2/11/21 11:02 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org>: > >> On 2/10/21 4:28 PM, Yu Jin wrote: >> >> Am Mi., 10. Feb. 2021 um 20:23 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 20:05, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:02:19 PM WET Yu Jin wrote: > > Will be pointless imo, it's not the script's fault that python is not > found. > > The fault is to be searched in the part of code which adds the prefix > path > > to the

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On 2/11/21 11:02 AM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 2/10/21 4:28 PM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Mi., 10. Feb. 2021 um 20:23 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 2/10/21 2:14 PM,

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

On Thursday, February 11, 2021 4:02:19 PM WET Yu Jin wrote: > Will be pointless imo, it's not the script's fault that python is not found. > The fault is to be searched in the part of code which adds the prefix path > to the environment, which part would that be? After all when installing, > the

Re: 2.4 alpha2 failing on windows 10

Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 2/10/21 4:28 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Mi., 10. Feb. 2021 um 20:23 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org>: > >> On 2/10/21 2:14 PM, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: >> >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at

Re: FindAdv, request for comments

Am Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:38:15 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:02:09PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Problems with FindAdv and search with not ignored format > > > > What we have now is something 'neither fish nor fowl'. > > > > For instance for the search of

Re: Use C++ testing framework

Am Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:54:23 +0200 schrieb Yuriy Skalko : > > Compiles fine. > > Test is very fast (no options used) > > > > Is that the expected output? > > ... > > [doctest] doctest version is "2.4.5" > > [doctest] run with "--help" for options > >

Re: Use C++ testing framework

Compiles fine. Test is very fast (no options used) Is that the expected output? ... [doctest] doctest version is "2.4.5" [doctest] run with "--help" for options === [doctest] test cases: 14 | 14 passed | 0

Re: Use C++ testing framework

Am Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:35:10 +0200 schrieb Yuriy Skalko : > > I'm all for focusing on 2.4.0 release. So I'll not push yet my commits into > > newly > > created branch features/unit-test-adoption. > > > After some time-out I've pushed my work on unit testing into > unit-test-adoption branch

Re: Use C++ testing framework

I'm all for focusing on 2.4.0 release. So I'll not push yet my commits into newly created branch features/unit-test-adoption. After some time-out I've pushed my work on unit testing into unit-test-adoption branch in features repository. So if you have some free time and are interested,