Am 04.01.2022 um 01:37 schrieb José Abílio Matos :
>
> On Friday, 31 December 2021 13.03.57 WET Stephan Witt wrote:
> > I’m curious how difficult it would be to ignore python2 and present a
> > message box for users to tell them how to get a python3 interpreter.
> >
> > BR, Stephan
>
> For now
Am 03.01.2022 um 16:15 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:07:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> commit d4324034300f73f76e5ac34fb1e7653fa6e2ddf5
>> Author: Stephan Witt
>> Date: Mon Jan 3 07:37:03 2022 +0100
>>
>>#12434 add event handler for pinch-to-zoom gesture
>> ---
On Monday, 3 January 2022 18.32.14 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> In any case I found other cases where the code is wrong (like the BOM
> removal that does not work) and that it does not give an error although it
> is wrong.
For future reference this is an issue that happens silently. In this
On Friday, 31 December 2021 13.03.57 WET Stephan Witt wrote:
> I’m curious how difficult it would be to ignore python2 and present a
> message box for users to tell them how to get a python3 interpreter.
>
> BR, Stephan
For now we always search for Python 3 before Python 2. We know what is the
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 10.38.38 WET Stephan Witt wrote:
> In any case we should ensure the detected usable python is used
> consequently.
>
> Stephan
This should be done now.
All the heuristics regarding Python detection is now placed in src/support/
os.cpp. In particular we can try use
On Monday, 3 January 2022 22.40.05 WET Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> If i remember correctly, if the command starts with "python -tt" then we
> could be sure it was a command defined by us and we replaced that with
> os::python(). The last was for sure invoking a Python 2, while the bare
> python
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 08:48:09PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 2 January 2022 21.36.22 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > OK, let me cc José on that.
> >
> > Riki
>
> I have a patch that it is mostly complete but I have one doubt.
> In src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp there is a
On Sunday, 2 January 2022 21.36.22 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> OK, let me cc José on that.
>
> Riki
I have a patch that it is mostly complete but I have one doubt.
In src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp there is a comment that says:
// Make sure that a V2 python is run, if available
Does anyone
On Monday, 3 January 2022 16.02.51 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:16:47PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > If you want I can take care of that, in 2.4, and see if there are cases
> > where the conversion is missing.
>
> Please do, I suffer from ophidiophobia.
You keep
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:16:47PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> If you want I can take care of that, in 2.4, and see if there are cases where
> the conversion is missing.
Please do, I suffer from ophidiophobia.
> @Riki: is it possible to have a layout file such that the encoding is not
>
On Monday, 3 January 2022 14.55.53 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> If I get that right the part of the "..." -> b"..." should be committed to
> 2.4?
>
> Pavel
Good point. Yes, it should (I thought that it already was) specially in order
to be consistent with all the other code that already does that.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:07:45AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> commit d4324034300f73f76e5ac34fb1e7653fa6e2ddf5
> Author: Stephan Witt
> Date: Mon Jan 3 07:37:03 2022 +0100
>
> #12434 add event handler for pinch-to-zoom gesture
> ---
Cool. I do not actually use the touch screen, but I
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 02:04:20PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Looking into further detail I would easily that the first part of the patch
> is
> correct (change "..." to b"...").
>
> The second part where it changes sys.stdin to sys.stdin.buffer is probably
> incorrect:
>
> The similar
On Sunday, 2 January 2022 23.52.37 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Another option would be instead of doing this in LyXRC.cpp to do it in
> Converter.cpp and Mover.cpp where supposedly the commands are used. Then we
> could expose this to users.
This is the counterpart to the previous patch. The
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 14.52.29 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jose,
>
> are the proposed changes sensible?
> I remember there were flowing similar patches to python codebase before.
The changes are reasonable for python 3.
I am not so sure about python 2 (because we support it) although it
15 matches
Mail list logo
