Re: LyXHTML doc doesn't pass validation

2022-03-23 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, 23 March 2022 20.12.23 WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > XHTML 1 dates back from 2001... LyX generates XHTML 5, but the doctype is kept > from XHTML 1 for compatibility issues (some browsers completely change their > behaviour based on the doctype). The issue has been discussed on the

Re: LyXHTML doc doesn't pass validation

2022-03-23 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 20:02, Lorenzo Bertini wrote: > Il 23/03/22 19:03, Thibaut Cuvelier ha scritto: > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 18:43, Lorenzo Bertini > > mailto:lorenzobertin...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Running a very simple LyXHTML doc (a section with a few paragraphs) > > against

Re: LyXHTML doc doesn't pass validation

2022-03-23 Thread Lorenzo Bertini
Il 23/03/22 19:03, Thibaut Cuvelier ha scritto: On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 18:43, Lorenzo Bertini mailto:lorenzobertin...@gmail.com>> wrote: Running a very simple LyXHTML doc (a section with a few paragraphs) against this validator https://validator.w3.org/check

Re: LyXHTML doc doesn't pass validation

2022-03-23 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 at 18:43, Lorenzo Bertini wrote: > Running a very simple LyXHTML doc (a section with a few paragraphs) > against this validator https://validator.w3.org/check reports some > errors, I don't really know if we care or not: > > 1. value of attribute "dir" cannot be "auto"; must

LyXHTML doc doesn't pass validation

2022-03-23 Thread Lorenzo Bertini
Running a very simple LyXHTML doc (a section with a few paragraphs) against this validator https://validator.w3.org/check reports some errors, I don't really know if we care or not: 1. value of attribute "dir" cannot be "auto"; must be one of "ltr", "rtl" 2. element "section" undefined Is

Re: LyX in the Snap Store

2022-03-23 Thread Igor Ljubuncic
Hey Pavel, No problem! I understand. Perhaps we can pick this conversation sometime in the future, if and when you have more bandwidth. (BTW, for the toolchain and security updates, you wouldn't really need that - for instance, if you specify imagemagick as a runtime dep, and you bundle it

Re: LyX in the Snap Store

2022-03-23 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:05:15PM +, Igor Ljubuncic wrote: > What I was thinking is a joint effort. If you do want to maintain snaps > long-term (emphasis on if), then you would need to understand and master > the process, which is why it is handy for you to get familiar with the > tooling.

Re: LyX in the Snap Store

2022-03-23 Thread Igor Ljubuncic
Hi Jean-Marc, Pavel, What I was thinking is a joint effort. If you do want to maintain snaps long-term (emphasis on if), then you would need to understand and master the process, which is why it is handy for you to get familiar with the tooling. That said, I can also help, prototype, test,