On 4/21/24 16:29, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/01/2024 à 02:11, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
Not sure. What I do not want is delay 2.4.0.
Big changes are probably not wise right now. I would suggest
committing the first part to 2.4.x as soon as we are sure an
emergency release will
Greetings.
I’m currently trying out LyX 2.4 RC4 and it is absolutely fantastic! Excellent
work by the development team!
There is one issue I haven’t found in bug reports, so I hope it is appropriate
mentioning it here.
With LyX 2.4.0~RC4 (on Mac, Apple silicon) instant preview of math
Le 11/01/2024 à 02:11, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
Not sure. What I do not want is delay 2.4.0.
Big changes are probably not wise right now. I would suggest committing
the first part to 2.4.x as soon as we are sure an emergency release will
not be needed, or if one is then as soon as we
On 4/20/24 21:51, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 01:50:12AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
commit 358efd120a87deb2cf404c762195c046a2e63507
Author: Pavel Sanda
Date: Sun Apr 21 03:49:12 2024 +0200
* metainfo.xml - homepage missing
---
lib/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml | 1 +
1 file
Le 21/04/2024 à 11:52, jspi...@gmail.com a écrit :
Am Dienstag, dem 16.04.2024 um 16:40 + schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
commit 365ff71e2319673c2685be79963443fee13c333b
Author: Richard Kimberly Heck
Date: Tue Apr 16 12:15:50 2024 -0400
Defer construction of temporary cursor.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 12:32:38PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 21.04.2024 um 12:20 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Actually I'm not sure I understand the lifecycle of chkconfig.ltx.
> > After renaming to chkconfig.ltx.bak some fresh chkconfig.ltx will be
> > created there or
Am Sonntag, dem 21.04.2024 um 11:59 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Will do if you are fine with my proposal.
Yes, sure.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Sonntag, dem 21.04.2024 um 12:20 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Actually I'm not sure I understand the lifecycle of chkconfig.ltx.
> After renaming to chkconfig.ltx.bak some fresh chkconfig.ltx will be
> created there or only chkconfig.ltx.bak remains?
The latter. Let me explain:
The problem is
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:47:59AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:42:08AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:57:49PM +, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > > + frontend::Alert::warning(_("Outdated
> > > configuration script
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:48:22AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 21.04.2024 um 11:42 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Not sure if it's woth the flurry of new commits, but:
> > 1) "We" sounds somewhat unusual in our messages
> > 2) "If you did not copy the script there" was
Am Dienstag, dem 16.04.2024 um 16:40 + schrieb Richard Kimberly
Heck:
> commit 365ff71e2319673c2685be79963443fee13c333b
> Author: Richard Kimberly Heck
> Date: Tue Apr 16 12:15:50 2024 -0400
>
> Defer construction of temporary cursor.
Doesn't this (and also the biginsets backports that
Am Sonntag, dem 21.04.2024 um 11:42 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Not sure if it's woth the flurry of new commits, but:
> 1) "We" sounds somewhat unusual in our messages
> 2) "If you did not copy the script there" was somewhat confusing on
> first reading as it does not relate to the previous
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 11:42:08AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:57:49PM +, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > + frontend::Alert::warning(_("Outdated
> > configuration script detected!"),
> > + _("We have
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 12:57:49PM +, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> + frontend::Alert::warning(_("Outdated
> configuration script detected!"),
> + _("We have detected an outdated script
> 'chkconfig.ltx' in your user
14 matches
Mail list logo
