- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
> #10199: Non-encodable characters with XeTeX
> --
> Reporter: andnot | Owner: lasgouttes
> Type: defect | Status: fixedinmaster
> Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.2.1
>
Dear LyX developers,
the LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S was added to Unicode Standard Version 5.1,
published in April 2008.
It is supported by the LaTeX command \SS since ages. Most fonts will
typeset it according to the official German orthography as SS while e.g. the
libertine font will use the
Dear LyX developers,
the LATIN CAPITAL LETTER SHARP S was added to Unicode Standard Version 5.1,
published in April 2008.
It is supported by the LaTeX command \SS "since ages". Most fonts will
typeset it according to the official German orthography as SS while e.g. the
libertine font will use
On 4.01.09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G. Milde a écrit :
... For layouts accepting several optional
arguments, I guess we'll need to come up with some trick.
For styles accepting several mandatory, or optional and mandatory arguments,
too.
Yes, but we do not even support them yet
On 4.01.09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> G. Milde a écrit :
>>> ... For layouts accepting several optional
>>> arguments, I guess we'll need to come up with some trick.
>> For styles accepting several mandatory, or optional and mandatory arguments,
>> too.
On 2.01.09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin Vermeer martin.verm...@tkk.fi writes:
IMO the name should be coded in the layout file.
...
2/ when the menu item string contains %s, the menu code replaces this %s
with the message returned by above.
...
Definitely. Any implementation ideas?
On 2.01.09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer writes:
> >> IMO the name should be coded in the layout file.
...
> >> 2/ when the menu item string contains %s, the menu code replaces this %s
> >> with the message returned by above.
...
> > Definitely. Any
The attached module enables resuming an enumeration with the new
Enumerate-Resume style. See the example file for usage details.
It also allows customising base lists with optional arguments
(Still to be found under EinfügenKurztitel.)
Why not use a different Style for a resuming enumeration?
On 24.11.08, rgheck wrote:
G. Milde wrote:
The attached module enables resuming an enumeration with the new
Enumerate-Resume style. See the example file for usage details.
Question (in case you already know): What happens if the user chooses
this environment without a previous Enumerate
The attached module enables resuming an enumeration with the new
Enumerate-Resume style. See the example file for usage details.
It also allows customising base lists with optional arguments
(Still to be found under Einfügen>Kurztitel.)
> Why not use a different Style for a "resuming
On 24.11.08, rgheck wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
>> The attached module enables resuming an enumeration with the new
>> Enumerate-Resume style. See the example file for usage details.
> Question (in case you already know): What happens if the user chooses
> this environme
On 21.11.08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Guenter Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder whether it would be better to put the intelligence into lyx:
let lyx compute the start number of a resumed enumeration and use this to
set the label and the correct `enum*' counter.
I would not do
On 21.11.08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Guenter Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where can I find out what the intended behaviour of these languages is
(regarding the ~ character)?
The dictionaries for spellchecking are different. I am not sure there is
another one.
Your links below
On 21.11.08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I wonder whether it would be better to put the "intelligence" into lyx:
> >
> > let lyx compute the start number of a resumed enumeration and use this to
> > set the label and the correct `enum*' counter.
> I
On 21.11.08, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Where can I find out what the intended behaviour of these languages is
> > (regarding the ~ character)?
> The dictionaries for spellchecking are different. I am not sure there is
> another one.
Your links
On 25.09.08, rgheck wrote:
G Milde wrote:
2. I would like some alternative binding for mathed:
As Pavel said, this would be excellent, but isn't for 1.6.
I filed a bug report for this: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5286
Günter
On 25.09.08, rgheck wrote:
> G Milde wrote:
>> 2. I would like some alternative binding for mathed:
> As Pavel said, this would be excellent, but isn't for 1.6.
I filed a bug report for this: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5286
Günter
Pavel Sanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Richard Heck wrote:
G Milde wrote:
On the other side would be a wizard like layout-creator with
drop-down and selection lists (like the citation insert dialogue) for
GUI creation of layouts without exposure to the syntax.
A wizard is pretty much what
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
This has now been committed.
Just a name change proposal: command-alternatives - command-try
Next issue is the bindings. There ought to
be other places we can use this, too, no?
1. a find-next binding that recalls the last search from the find dialogue
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> G Milde wrote:
>>> On the other side would be a "wizard" like layout-creator with
>>> drop-down and selection lists (like the citation insert dialogue) for
>>> GUI creation of l
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> This has now been committed.
Just a name change proposal: command-alternatives -> command-try
> Next issue is the bindings. There ought to
> be other places we can use this, too, no?
1. a find-next binding that recalls the last search from the find
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:24:17AM +, G Milde wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:48:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
it would be possible for me to lead lyx layout editor as a small
school project provided
rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Here's the latest version of this patch. The main change is that this
one addresses the issue of the shortcuts dialog. As I've said elsewhere,
the dialog in its current state simply can't deal with the binding of
multiple LFUNs to one key. My
Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
You managed to convice me. With the attached patch, the unicode accented
characters are interpreted as math variables when they are entered in
mathmode. Please test.
Thanks for your work.
Unfortunately, I did not have the time to compile a patched
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:24:17AM +, G Milde wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:48:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> >> it would be possible for me to lead
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Here's the latest version of this patch. The main change is that this
> one addresses the issue of the shortcuts dialog. As I've said elsewhere,
> the dialog in its current state simply can't deal with the binding of
> multiple LFUNs to one key. My
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> You managed to convice me. With the attached patch, the unicode accented
> characters are interpreted as math variables when they are entered in
> mathmode. Please test.
Thanks for your work.
Unfortunately, I did not have the time to compile a
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:48:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
it would be possible for me to lead lyx layout editor as a small
school project provided that it is work complicated enough.
Instead of a specialised editor, I would suggest a lyx-layout mode
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
it would be possible for me to lead lyx layout editor as a small
school project provided that it is work complicated enough.
Instead of a specialised editor, I would suggest a lyx-layout mode
for an existing text editor (Jed, Emacs,
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:04:33PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
On 18.09.08, Helge Hafting wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:13:49PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
With LyX 1.6, using unicode characters other than
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:48:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> it would be possible for me to lead lyx layout editor as a small
>> school project provided that it is work complicated enough.
Instead of a specialised editor, I would suggest a
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
it would be possible for me to lead lyx layout editor as a small
school project provided that it is work complicated enough.
>>Instead of a specialised editor, I would suggest a lyx-layout "mode"
>> for an existing text editor
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:04:33PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
>>> On 18.09.08, Helge Hafting wrote:
>>>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:13:49PM +0200,
On 18.09.08, Helge Hafting wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:13:49PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
With LyX 1.6, using unicode characters other than Basic Latin is possible
also in math mode.
Note that in math mode TeX (and even XeTeX) doesn't support anything
outside
On 18.09.08, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:13:49PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
>>> With LyX 1.6, using unicode characters other than Basic Latin is possible
>>> also in math mode.
>> Note that in math mode TeX (and eve
On 16.09.08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:13:49PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
On 9.09.08, G. Milde wrote:
please send me a copy of eventual replies, as I am just a user.
* should the input-math conversion only be done for characters
from Basic Latin
On 16.09.08, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 02:13:49PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
> > On 9.09.08, G. Milde wrote:
> > please send me a copy of eventual replies, as I am just a user.
> > * should the "input->math" conversion only be done for
On 9.09.08, G. Milde wrote:
Dear LyX users,
...
but I was told that this is rather somethign for lyx-devel. So, please send
me a copy of eventual replies, as I am just a user.
With LyX 1.6, using unicode characters other than Basic Latin is possible
also in math mode. This is a vast
On 9.09.08, G. Milde wrote:
> Dear LyX users,
...
but I was told that this is rather somethign for lyx-devel. So, please send
me a copy of eventual replies, as I am just a user.
With LyX 1.6, using unicode characters other than Basic Latin is possible
also in math mode. This is a v
On 18.08.08, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
So LyX mirrors the LaTeX output -- at least partially:
It's OK for LyX not to mirror the LaTeX output, as long as there are no
'unmeant' things to happen.
It is IMO a bug, if paragraph breaks are not distinguishable from
normal line breaks,
On 18.08.08, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> > So LyX mirrors the LaTeX output -- at least partially:
> It's OK for LyX not to mirror the LaTeX output, as long as there are no
> 'unmeant' things to happen.
It is IMO a bug, if paragraph breaks are not distinguishable from
"normal" line
On 30.07.08, rgheck wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
The option to remove paragraph justification would also be nice :)
Menu Edit-Paragraph settings
Oh, I meant for the LyX display of text :)
i rememember there was announced special module for screen only
Left-align of Standard paragraphs on
On 18.08.08, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Actually, it is for left-aligning (on-screen) most paragraph Styles
*except* Standard, as (by some bug) a Standard paragraphs' first
line is not indented if the paragraphs alignment is set to 'left-align'.
This is not a (some) bug of LyX,
On 30.07.08, rgheck wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> The option to remove paragraph justification would also be nice :)
Menu Edit->Paragraph settings
>>> Oh, I meant for the LyX display of text :)
>> i rememember there was announced special module for screen only
>> Left-align of
On 18.08.08, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> > Actually, it is for left-aligning (on-screen) most paragraph Styles
> > *except* "Standard", as (by some bug) a "Standard" paragraphs' first
> > line is not indented if the paragraphs alignment is set to 'left-align'.
> This is not a (some)
On 18.07.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Andreas Vox wrote:
Questions:
* Is it ok to do that for quotation and quote?
From a typographical point of view: no. All typographic works that I
know say that indendation has to be ommitted after quotations. That
might be culturally specific,
On 18.07.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Andreas Vox wrote:
> > Questions:
> >
> > * Is it ok to do that for quotation and quote?
>
> From a typographical point of view: no. All typographic works that I
> know say that indendation has to be ommitted after quotations. That
> might be culturally
On 15.07.05, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
But also help with verifying the bugs in bugzilla (are the unconfirmed
bugs really a bug or not?), checking that open bugs are still valid,
and reporting bugs that are not mentioned in bugzilla.
313 nor P2 PC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15.07.05, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But also help with verifying the bugs in bugzilla (are the unconfirmed
> bugs really a bug or not?), checking that open bugs are still valid,
> and reporting bugs that are not mentioned in bugzilla.
313 nor P2 PC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8.07.05, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Attached the diffs against current CVS and the new layout and example
file. If you want, apply them for LyX 1.3.x and/or LyX 1.4.x.
Argh I forgot them again. Now attached.
The file could become a lot shorter (and easier to maintain) by using
CopyLayout for
On 8.07.05, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >Attached the diffs against current CVS and the new layout and example
> >file. If you want, apply them for LyX 1.3.x and/or LyX 1.4.x.
>
> Argh I forgot them again. Now attached.
The file could become a lot shorter (and easier to maintain) by using
CopyLayout
On 28.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So IMHO short title should be given a more general name in all
languages.
G Actually, it would be nice, if the name (menu entry string) could
G be given in the layout file as argument for OptionalArgs
On 28.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> >So IMHO "short title" should be given a more general name in all
> >> >languages.
>
> G> Actually, it would
On 30.06.05, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
one is about the optional arg to the \frame command
\frame[plain]{\titlepage} - \frame{[}plain{]}{titlepage}
You can fix this sort of errors easily yourself: Add
On 30.06.05, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> >
> > > one is about the optional arg to the \frame command
> > > \frame[plain]{\titlepage} -> \frame{[}plain{]}{titlepage}
> >
> > You can fix this sort of errors
On 29.06.05, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I defined a few latex macros like
\newcommand{\SRx}[1]{\hyperref[headsrx#1
{\MakeUppercase{sr}x\_\MakeTextUppercase{#1}}}
If this would be a complete paragraph, LyX support would be excellent by
defining a new .layout file.
But these
On 29.06.05, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I defined a few latex macros like
>
> \newcommand{\SRx}[1]{\hyperref[headsrx#1
> {\MakeUppercase{sr}x\_\MakeTextUppercase{#1}}}
> If this would be a complete paragraph, LyX support would be excellent by
> defining a new .layout file.
>
> But
On 28.06.05, Helge Hafting wrote:
G. Milde wrote:
On 27.06.05, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
I wonder: Is short title _only_ for short titles, or is it a generic
way
of adding an optional argument? The two concepts translate
On 28.06.05, Helge Hafting wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> >On 27.06.05, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> >
> >>>I wonder: Is "short title" _only_ for short titles, or is it a generic
> >
Dear LyXers,
I just uploaded a new version of the
Letter (dinbrief)
layout to http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Dinbrief and wonder whether there is a
chance that this could go into the main distribution.
have a nice weekend
Günter
--
G.Milde web.de
Dear LyXers,
I just uploaded a new version of the
Letter (dinbrief)
layout to http://wiki.lyx.org/Layouts/Dinbrief and wonder whether there is a
chance that this could go into the main distribution.
have a nice weekend
Günter
--
G.Milde web.de
On 20.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
G. Milde wrote: 2. Call the style Labeling in koma and List
elsewhere. [...]
I'd favour variant 2, but I'm also fine with variant 3, as long as
the docs
On 20.06.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> G> On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >> G. Milde wrote: 2. Call the style "Labeling" in koma and "List"
> >>
On 15.06.05, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Rich Shepard wrote:
My goal is to have each title/itemized list as a separate block. If
I do not indent the itemized lines, both chunks are preceeded by the
block command and display in separate boxes. As soon as I specify
itemized for the details, I lose
On 15.06.05, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> Rich Shepard wrote:
> >
> > My goal is to have each title/itemized list as a separate block. If
> >I do not indent the itemized lines, both "chunks" are preceeded by the
> >"block" command and display in separate boxes. As soon as I specify
> >"itemized" for
On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
G. Milde wrote:
Style Comment
ObsoletedBy Standard
End
This is just because we now have comment inset. lyx2lyx will do the right
thing.
If lyx2lyx does the right thing, the ObsoletedBy is not needed.
Without lyx2lyx it is wrong. So
On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
G. Milde wrote:
So we have to weight the arguments for 3 possible options:
1. Call the lyx-list/labeling style List in all layouts.
[...]
2. Call the style Labeling in koma and List elsewhere.
[...]
3. Call the style Labeling in all layouts
On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> > Style Comment
> > ObsoletedBy Standard
> > End
> This is just because we now have comment inset. lyx2lyx will do the right
> thing.
If lyx2lyx does the right thing, the ObsoletedBy is no
On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> > So we have to weight the arguments for 3 possible options:
> > 1. Call the lyx-list/labeling style "List" in all layouts.
> [...]
> > 2. Call the style "Labeling" in koma and "List&quo
On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Juergen I do not agree to change the name from Labeling to List
Juergen in the GUI.
I really do not like that we are beginning to replace the termini
technici of LaTeX classes and environments with arbitrary names (or
translations, for that matter)
Browsing the layouts directory for my scrclass pathch, I found a problem
in obsolete.inc.
Style Comment
ObsoletedBy Standard
End
But: Comment vs. Standard is not just a naming convention. Silently
replacing comments by standard output can result in ugly surprises.
Example: Someone
On 10.06.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > Juergen> I do not agree to change the name from "Labeling" to "List"
> > Juergen> in the GUI.
>
> I really do not like that we are beginning to replace the termini
> technici of LaTeX classes and environments with arbitrary names (or
> translations,
Browsing the layouts directory for my scrclass pathch, I found a problem
in obsolete.inc.
Style Comment
ObsoletedBy Standard
End
But: Comment vs. Standard is not just a naming convention. Silently
replacing comments by standard output can result in ugly surprises.
Example: Someone
Dear LyX developers,
The following patch to scrclass.inc improves the compatibility between scr
(koma) and standard classes.
The koma environment labeling is virtually equivalent to the lyxlist, so
both should mapt to the same paragraph style List.
The patch also obsoletes the file
Dear LyX developers,
The following patch to scrclass.inc improves the compatibility between scr
(koma) and standard classes.
The koma environment "labeling" is virtually equivalent to the lyxlist, so
both should mapt to the same paragraph style "List".
The patch also obsoletes the file
On 7.06.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
Hello,
I have implemented the --try-hard option. As you can see it will catch
any python exception in the convertion step and ignore it.
My question is how to warn the user that something wrong happened
during the convertion? The goal would be to ask
On 7.06.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have implemented the --try-hard option. As you can see it will catch
> any python exception in the convertion step and ignore it.
>
> My question is how to warn the user that something wrong happened
> during the convertion? The goal would be
Dear Jose, dear developers,
I uploaded my (still not finally tested) LyX python package to
http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/PyClient
Hopefully this can become a base for further discussion.
On 31.05.05, José Matos wrote:
G. Milde wrote:
On 20.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 10:04
Dear Jose, dear developers,
I uploaded my (still not finally tested) "LyX" python package to
http://wiki.lyx.org/Tools/PyClient
Hopefully this can become a base for further discussion.
On 31.05.05, José Matos wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> > On 20.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
&g
On 31.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand what the problem is. I just say that Labelstring is not
supposed to be used for that. But for now
On 31.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> G> On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> >>>>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I un
On 30.05.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
At the very least the translated string should be
something like Beschriftung (Caption) or similar.
might cause space problems, but is better than what we have now.
BTW I also think that Beschriftung is not an ideal
On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the meantime, labelstrings help, but they are a hack. And really,
if all they are good for is to show the Style name, we have a problem.
Open the dinbrief template, to see what I mean.
E.g. there are 3
On 30.05.05, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > At the very least the translated string should be
> > something like "Beschriftung (Caption)" or similar.
>
> might cause space problems, but is better than what we have now.
>
> > > BTW I also think that "Beschriftung" is not
On 27.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the meantime, labelstrings help, but they are a hack. And really,
> if all they are good for is to show the Style name, we have a problem.
Open the din
On 25.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
G == G Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G Not a patch but a suggestion: Quite a lot of tasks are delegated
G by LyX to external programs, yet easy to start from within LyX. How
G about a button [Start bibtex editor] in the bibtex database dialog?
G
On 26.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Michael == Michael Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael JMarc, AFAICS you have introduced LabelStrings in layout
...
Michael The result is that the po files are flooded with Style
Michael _and_ LabelString messages at the same time :-(
I
On 25.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> G> Not a patch but a suggestion: Quite a lot of tasks are "delegated"
> G> by LyX to external programs, yet easy to start from within LyX.
On 26.05.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> JMarc, AFAICS you have introduced "LabelString"s in layout
...
> Michael> The result is that the po files are flooded with "Style"
> Michael> _and_ "LabelString" messages at the
On 24.05.05, Rune Schjellerup wrote:
BibTeX file creation.
I think we can leave this to specialized programs.
It would be nice if users didn't have to search the web for tools like
JabRef.
Just search the wiki.lyx.org and find the listing of programs under
On 25.05.05, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
G. Milde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 24.05.05, Rune Schjellerup wrote:
BibTeX file creation.
| I think we can leave this to specialized programs.
But we would expect a patch.
(But it would have to be fairly complete...)
Not a patch
On 24.05.05, Rune Schjellerup wrote:
> BibTeX file creation.
I think we can leave this to specialized programs.
> It would be nice if users didn't have to search the web for tools like
> JabRef.
Just search the wiki.lyx.org and find the listing of programs under
On 25.05.05, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "G. Milde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On 24.05.05, Rune Schjellerup wrote:
> >> BibTeX file creation.
> >
> | I think we can leave this to specialized programs.
>
> But we would expect a pat
On 24.05.05, Sebastian Zschernig wrote:
Hello.
It would be really great to provide a list of _all_ functions in LyX
which can be used by a shortcut defined in one of the bind-files.
Such a list is on wiki.lyx.org (search for lfuns).
And I would like another thing very much:
When I want
On 24.05.05, Sebastian Zschernig wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It would be really great to provide a list of _all_ functions in LyX
> which can be used by a shortcut defined in one of the bind-files.
Such a list is on wiki.lyx.org (search for lfuns).
> And I would like another thing very much:
> When I
On 20.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 10:04, G. Milde wrote:
Now a serious question: is this [__init__.py] a trivial (empty) file or
do you have any initialization step going inside?
Currently, its just
Package of scripts for the LyX Document Processor (www.lyx.org
On 20.05.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 20 May 2005 10:04, G. Milde wrote:
> Now a serious question: is this [__init__.py] a trivial (empty) file or
> do you have any initialization step going inside?
Currently, its just
"""Package of scripts for the LyX Documen
On 25.04.05, Herbert Voss wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
it it possible that we change the check box order in the float placement
window
...
to
- here
- top
- bottom
- page
This is more intuitive, because LaTeX uses always this order.
no, LaTeX knows no presetting, it depends to the
On 25.04.05, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> >it it possible that we change the check box order in the float placement
> >window
...
> >to
> >
> >- here
> >- top
> >- bottom
> >- page
> >
> >This is more intuitive, because LaTeX uses always this order.
>
> no, LaTeX knows no
On 21.04.05, Helge Hafting wrote:
... Seems to me there is little point in setting the ERT text in a
special font, especially considering that the current approach only
goes halfway. The ERT text got bigger, but it was still red and still
in its special font.
However, this font change
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo