Stephan Witt st.witt at gmx.net writes:
Here is a first version for an evaluation of the feature:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/
LyX-2.2.0dev-a09eaf44%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/
LyX-2.2.0dev-a09eaf44%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg.sig
There are some reports on the users list about LyX not finding standard
classes.
AFAIK, all the users reporting this problem are Yosemite users.
There is some feedback that this is helpful:
Stephan Witt gmx.net> writes:
>
> Here is a first version for an evaluation of the feature:
>
>
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/
LyX-2.2.0dev-a09eaf44%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg
>
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/
LyX-2.2.0dev-a09eaf44%2Bqt5-x86_64-cocoa.dmg.sig
>
Thanks
> There are some reports on the users list about LyX not finding standard
> classes.
> AFAIK, all the users reporting this problem are Yosemite users.
>
> There is some feedback that this is helpful:
>
I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros.
In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue
frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be \mathrm{e}. This macro is
sometimes displayed as a non-cursive e (as it should be) and sometimes
I have partially repeatable display issues concerning macros.
In old documentssome formulas display (some) macros as an empty boxes with blue
frames. For instance, I head defined \varexp to be \mathrm{e}. This macro is
sometimes displayed as a non-cursive e (as it should be) and sometimes
I can confirm the observation of Dan: Insert Special Character Symbols
dialog box is completely devoid of symbols.
This is on Mac OS 10.9 with the 2.1.0beta2 Mac binary produced by the LyX team
Regards, Marcus
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:29 AM, DWL ld...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Searched the
I can confirm the observation of Dan: Insert > Special Character > Symbols
dialog box is completely devoid of symbols.
This is on Mac OS 10.9 with the 2.1.0beta2 Mac binary produced by the LyX team
Regards, Marcus
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:29 AM, DWL wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
, that patch is already in LyX 2.1 beta 2. If it
does not work for you, post any information on the ticket.
Scott
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Marcus Kriele mkri...@me.com wrote:
From the bug tracker I understand that Jürgen Spitzmüller has a patch for
#8445 which is supposed to go
nderstand, that patch is already in LyX 2.1 beta 2. If it
> does not work for you, post any information on the ticket.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Marcus Kriele <mkri...@me.com> wrote:
>> From the bug tracker I understand that Jürgen Spitzmül
From the bug tracker I understand that Jürgen Spitzmüller has a patch for
#8445 which is supposed to go into LyX 2.1. However, I still see this bug in
2.1 beta 2 (OSX Mavericks). Would it be possible to fix it for the next beta?
Marcus
PS. Thanks for all your great work on LyX, which I find
From the bug tracker I understand that Jürgen Spitzmüller has a patch for
#8445 which is supposed to go into LyX 2.1. However, I still see this bug in
2.1 beta 2 (OSX Mavericks). Would it be possible to fix it for the next beta?
Marcus
PS. Thanks for all your great work on LyX, which I find
Yes, #7506 is invalid and I just marked as as such.
On 2011-9-23 19:32 , LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#7301: Issues with svmono.layout
+---
Reporter: marcus | Owner: uwestoehr
Type: defect | Status:
Yes, #7506 is invalid and I just marked as as such.
On 2011-9-23 19:32 , LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#7301: Issues with svmono.layout
+---
Reporter: marcus | Owner: uwestoehr
Type: defect | Status:
On 2011-9-22 14:43 , LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#7301: Issues with svmono.layout
+---
Reporter: marcus | Owner: uwestoehr
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.0.2
On 2011-9-22 14:43 , LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#7301: Issues with svmono.layout
+---
Reporter: marcus | Owner: uwestoehr
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.0.2
Richard,
I had hoped that Uwe would reply as he made the final changes.
The files I had submitted were exensively tested and their last version
did not have any issues with old sv files. I had also tested Uwe's last
modifications. His version also appeared to work well with old sv
files, so
Richard,
I had hoped that Uwe would reply as he made the final changes.
The files I had submitted were exensively tested and their last version
did not have any issues with old sv files. I had also tested Uwe's last
modifications. His version also appeared to work well with old sv
files, so
Instant preview does not seem to work with the 2.0.1 cocoa binary for
Mac OSX. I have re-downloaded the last 2.0.0 version of the binary and
instant preview works flawlessly with this older version. Therefore my
problem does not seem to be caused by my lyx settings, unless I missed a
change
Sorry, I should have been more precise. Instant preview for included
graphics (I have now tested jpg, pdf, eps) does work for me. What does
not work is instant preview for equations which are typeset in LyX. I
am using OSX 10.7.1
Regards, Marcus
I have now identified what caused my problem. I can easily work around
the issue as it relates to some preamble code that I do not need.
However, the issue points to strange side effects.
I was looking at child documents of a master document. The preamble of
the master document contains
Instant preview does not seem to work with the 2.0.1 cocoa binary for
Mac OSX. I have re-downloaded the last 2.0.0 version of the binary and
instant preview works flawlessly with this older version. Therefore my
problem does not seem to be caused by my lyx settings, unless I missed a
change
Sorry, I should have been more precise. Instant preview for included
graphics (I have now tested jpg, pdf, eps) does work for me. What does
not work is instant preview for equations which are typeset in LyX. I
am using OSX 10.7.1
Regards, Marcus
I have now identified what caused my problem. I can easily work around
the issue as it relates to some preamble code that I do not need.
However, the issue points to strange side effects.
I was looking at child documents of a master document. The preamble of
the master document contains
I seem to remember that I had recently changed a label in a document
with several children and the references in other children have
automatically been updated correctly.
However, even if updating across children works at all times, there
would be pitfalls in co-authored docuements. For
I seem to remember that I had recently changed a label in a document
with several children and the references in other children have
automatically been updated correctly.
However, even if updating across children works at all times, there
would be pitfalls in co-authored docuements. For
On 2011-7-15 13:06 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
This is not necessary. Before LyX was able to display the number also
within LyX, we used a normal # to indicate that in the output will
be a number. Colored labels indicate that they are only hints what to
do and don't appear in the output. But in this
I noticed two additional bugs in the style preface (for svmono):
1) The style Preface has been assigned to the category For Authors.
This could be appropriate for the class svmult but not for svmono. I
propose to use the category FrontMatter
2) Preface has an optional argument just as
On 2011-7-15 13:06 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
This is not necessary. Before LyX was able to display the number also
within LyX, we used a normal "#" to indicate that in the output will
be a number. Colored labels indicate that they are only hints what to
do and don't appear in the output. But in this
I noticed two additional bugs in the style preface (for svmono):
1) The style Preface has been assigned to the category "For Authors".
This could be appropriate for the class svmult but not for svmono. I
propose to use the category "FrontMatter"
2) Preface has an optional argument just as
On 2011-7-13 22:35 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 11.07.2011 23:35, schrieb Marcus Kriele:
However, I would change the label of the
sol environment: Currently it is an automatically generated counter
that may have nothing to do with
the counter of the corresponding problem. I find this misleading
On 2011-7-13 22:35 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 11.07.2011 23:35, schrieb Marcus Kriele:
However, I would change the label of the
sol environment: Currently it is an automatically generated counter
that may have nothing to do with
the counter of the corresponding problem. I find this misleading
I have tested the new layouts and templates for svmono, svjour3, and
svmult. In these new versions, the proof, solution and problem
environments work for me. However, I would change the label of the sol
environment: Currently it is an automatically generated counter that
may have nothing to
I have tested the new layouts and templates for svmono, svjour3, and
svmult. In these new versions, the proof, solution and problem
environments work for me. However, I would change the label of the sol
environment: Currently it is an automatically generated counter that
may have nothing to
Uwe,
great that you could fix the numbering!
I have tested your templates and I found the following issues (Mac, LyX
2.0.0):
svmono_book.lyx:
1) Minor -- Master document has not been set. I propose to do so for
each include file so that View master document and Update master
document
Uwe,
great that you could fix the numbering!
I have tested your templates and I found the following issues (Mac, LyX
2.0.0):
svmono_book.lyx:
1) Minor -- Master document has not been set. I propose to do so for
each include file so that "View master document" and "Update master
Uwe,
I have not tested the files yet but I have looked through your changes.
I find some of these changes problematic as they impair functionality:
1) You have replaced the theorem type environments by the standard
theorem include file, in which theorem-like environments are defined via
Uwe,
I have not tested the files yet but I have looked through your changes.
I find some of these changes problematic as they impair functionality:
1) You have replaced the theorem type environments by the standard
theorem include file, in which theorem-like environments are defined via
Please see the class specific test files that I had uploaded to bug
report #7301. They should contain every feature that is supported.
Hopefully this reduced the amount of time necessary for further
testing. I had also uploaded updated template files.
Regards, Marcus
On 2011-6-17 9:43 ,
Hi Uwe,
thanks for the work you are putting in to improve my changes!
On 2011-6-17 24:35 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I had a look and fixed this. (You forgot to define the counters.) I
created now a new file which contains all theorem environments of
classes which already define them, like the sv***
Please see the class specific test files that I had uploaded to bug
report #7301. They should contain every feature that is supported.
Hopefully this reduced the amount of time necessary for further
testing. I had also uploaded updated template files.
Regards, Marcus
On 2011-6-17 9:43 ,
Hi Uwe,
thanks for the work you are putting in to improve my changes!
On 2011-6-17 24:35 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I had a look and fixed this. (You forgot to define the counters.) I
created now a new file which contains all theorem environments of
classes which already define them, like the sv***
Richard,
svglobal3.layout is one of the Springer layout files which I had updated
(#bug 7301). The issue should not exist in my corrected files that I
had posted in the bug report and sent to you as a zipped archive.
Marcus
Uwe,
please see my comments below.
Marcus
On 2011-6-16 18:53 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 16.06.2011 19:41, schrieb Marcus Kriele:
The following issues still persist:
2) Short title for optional arguments does not work. This is
intentional in order to guarantee
backward compatibility.
I
Richard,
svglobal3.layout is one of the Springer layout files which I had updated
(#bug 7301). The issue should not exist in my corrected files that I
had posted in the bug report and sent to you as a zipped archive.
Marcus
Uwe,
please see my comments below.
Marcus
On 2011-6-16 18:53 , Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 16.06.2011 19:41, schrieb Marcus Kriele:
> The following issues still persist:
>
> 2) "Short title" for optional arguments does not work. This is
intentional in order to guarantee
>
On 2011-4-29 7:07 , LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#7506: CopyStyle for inset layout does not work
Comment(by rgheck):
I'll have to check this with current trunk. But I'm guessing that the
issue is just that the new layouts were not named properly, yet the layout
format is beyond where lyx2lyx
On 2011-4-29 7:07 , LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
#7506: CopyStyle for inset layout does not work
Comment(by rgheck):
I'll have to check this with current trunk. But I'm guessing that the
issue is just that the new layouts were not named properly, yet the layout
format is beyond where lyx2lyx
I have produced a new version of the layout files, the test files, and
the templates. It has been posted to the bug tracker.
This new version is now fully backward compatible. However, the style
abstract now behaves differently as the current implementation is broken.
The following price
On 2011-4-26 14:58 , Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/26/2011 02:09 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
I have found that LyXHTML chokes on the table of contents. If the
table of contents is removed in my example files then LyXHTML
produces valid HTML files that can be read by Firefox 4.
Hmm. Well, I should
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the
Gnu General Public License, version 2 or later.
Marcus Kriele
To date I have only fixed some sv* layout files (Bug 7301) which is targeted
for 2.0.1.
I have produced a new version of the layout files, the test files, and
the templates. It has been posted to the bug tracker.
This new version is now fully backward compatible. However, the style
abstract now behaves differently as the current implementation is broken.
The following price
On 2011-4-26 14:58 , Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/26/2011 02:09 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
I have found that LyXHTML chokes on the table of contents. If the
table of contents is removed in my example files then LyXHTML
produces valid HTML files that can be read by Firefox 4.
Hmm. Well, I should
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the
Gnu General Public License, version 2 or later.
Marcus Kriele
To date I have only fixed some sv* layout files (Bug 7301) which is targeted
for 2.0.1.
Here is a list of backward incompatibilities and issues with the
existing layouts
-- svglobal3.layout, (Original Layout, to be replaced by svjour3.layout)
Original template Issues:
a) Insets Keywords, PACS, Subclass: I do not know how to insert these
inserts. (They are not listed in the
Here is a list of backward incompatibilities and issues with the
existing layouts
-- svglobal3.layout, (Original Layout, to be replaced by svjour3.layout)
Original template Issues:
a) Insets Keywords, PACS, Subclass: I do not know how to insert these
inserts. (They are not listed in the
I have prepared replacement layout files for Springer monographs
(svmono.layout), Springer contributed books (svmult.layout), Springer
journals (svjour3.layout). I also prepared a file svcommon.inc that is
read by all three layout files. They do not depend on any current
layout files. These
I have prepared replacement layout files for Springer monographs
(svmono.layout), Springer contributed books (svmult.layout), Springer
journals (svjour3.layout). I also prepared a file svcommon.inc that is
read by all three layout files. They do not depend on any current
layout files. These
I am trying to support a command with argument for run-in headings: It
produces a small vertical skip without indent and then writes the text
in the argument in a bold font. Is it possible to mimic this behavior
in LyX? I experimented with the LabelType Manual directive but could
not get it
I am trying to support a command with argument for run-in headings: It
produces a small vertical skip without indent and then writes the text
in the argument in a bold font. Is it possible to mimic this behavior
in LyX? I experimented with the LabelType Manual directive but could
not get it to
Thanks!
I have filed a bug (#7468) for those cases where there should be
support from the layout file. I believe that the layout was known to
tex2lyx since the created LyX document used formatting that I had
defined in the same layout file.
Marcus
I am trying to support a command with argument for run-in headings: It
produces a small vertical skip without indent and then writes the text
in the argument in a bold font. Is it possible to mimic this behavior
in LyX? I experimented with the "LabelType Manual" directive but could
not get
I am trying to support a command with argument for run-in headings: It
produces a small vertical skip without indent and then writes the text
in the argument in a bold font. Is it possible to mimic this behavior
in LyX? I experimented with the "LabelType Manual" directive but could
not get it
Thanks!
I have filed a bug (#7468) for those cases where there should be
support from the layout file. I believe that the layout was known to
tex2lyx since the created LyX document used formatting that I had
defined in the same layout file.
Marcus
Le 17/04/11 18:27, Marcus Kriele a écrit :
Actually, when I come to think of it, I might have tried to use
NextNoIndent where the following paragraph was not the default style. So
it would be helpful to add to the description that NextNoIndent only has
an effect if the following
On 2011-4-18 9:12 , Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Then the question is to know whether this is annoying enough to
deserve a new tag :)
It might be also that the indenting depends on the question of
outputting or not an empty line after environments...
JMarc
It is certainly a very minor
Le 17/04/11 18:27, Marcus Kriele a écrit :
Actually, when I come to think of it, I might have tried to use
NextNoIndent where the following paragraph was not the default style. So
it would be helpful to add to the description that NextNoIndent only has
an effect if the following
On 2011-4-18 9:12 , Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Then the question is to know whether this is annoying enough to
deserve a new tag :)
It might be also that the indenting depends on the question of
outputting or not an empty line after environments...
JMarc
It is certainly a very minor
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:00:04 -0700Julien Rioux
On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
3) I am implementing support for a part sectioning command that prints
some additional text on the next (otherwise empty) page.
In the environment that contains the additional text I do
On 04/16/2011 04:12 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/16/2011 03:59 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout
files,
On looking at this now, I see that NextNoIndent
On 04/16/2011 04:12 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/16/2011 03:59 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout
files,
I'll fix the docs
Actually, when I come to think of it, I might
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:00:04 -0700Julien Rioux
On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
3) I am implementing support for a part sectioning command that prints
some additional text on the next (otherwise empty) page.
In the environment that contains the additional text I do
On 04/16/2011 04:12 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/16/2011 03:59 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout
files,
On looking at this now, I see that NextNoIndent
On 04/16/2011 04:12 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/16/2011 03:59 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 16/04/2011 3:40 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote:
I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout
files,
I'll fix the docs
Actually, when I come to think of it, I might
I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout files,
and the following 4 questions have arisen:
1) NextNoIndent prevents the following paragraph (whether of the same or
a different layout) from being indented. Is there a possibility to
restrict this behavior such that in
I am trying to address bug #7301 concerning the Springer layout files,
and the following 4 questions have arisen:
1) NextNoIndent prevents the following paragraph (whether of the same or
a different layout) from being indented. Is there a possibility to
restrict this behavior such that in
As a user I vote for libreoffice.
The icons are very clear and will make it easier for users migrating
from OpenOffice or LibreOffice to start with LyX.
However, I would like to propose the following small changes:
1) Advanced find/replace:
As the magnifying glass is used in LibreOffice for
As a user I vote for libreoffice.
The icons are very clear and will make it easier for users migrating
from OpenOffice or LibreOffice to start with LyX.
However, I would like to propose the following small changes:
1) Advanced find/replace:
As the magnifying glass is used in LibreOffice for
I think that math corners and math background serve different
purposes. Math corners do not only indicate the outline of the whole
formula but also the outline of frame elements within this formula.
This is the reason why I use them. I believe that the purpose of math
background is to show
is excellent and much better than my own proposal of
ordering the existing colors in a hierarchical way!
Regards,
Marcus
On 2010-9-2 10:17 , Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
Marcus Kriele<mkri...@me.com> writes:
Yes, I do. As I am using LaTeX preview, math corners are only
visible to me
Yes, I do. As I am using LaTeX preview, math corners are only visible
to me when I activate a formula. They serve as additional visual
support, because they indicate which corners (in another part of the
activated formula) would light up as math frame when my cursor is
moved into this
On 2010-8-31 12:19 , Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote:
Marcus Kriele<mkri...@me.com> writes:
- remove math corners (The default is already the default background
and is most probably never changed by users.)
In my opinion this would make lyx less usable. I have enabled math
corners (dark grey,
Dear all,
As an enthusiastic user of LyX I would like to weigh in on the discussion about
colors.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I propose
...
- remove math corners (The default is already the default background
and is most probably never changed by users.)
...
In my opinion this would
Dear all,
As an enthusiastic user of LyX I would like to weigh in on the discussion about
colors.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I propose
...
- remove math corners (The default is already the default background
and is most probably never changed by users.)
...
In my opinion this would
The beta 3 for mac binary does not display the times font which is
selected in preferences but instead a sans serif font. In addition,
the size of math preview larger than it should be.
This seems to be a problem with the binary itself since the problem
persists if I use the local
The beta 3 for mac binary does not display the times font which is
selected in preferences but instead a sans serif font. In addition,
the size of math preview larger than it should be.
This seems to be a problem with the binary itself since the problem
persists if I use the local
86 matches
Mail list logo