Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43:47PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: It's interesting especially in the light of a recent discussion in Debian which of the traditional Unix tools should no longer have priority standard and thus be installed as a default. Do you have a link

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:43:47PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > It's interesting especially in the light of a recent discussion in > > Debian which of the "traditional" Unix tools should no longer have > > priority standard and thus be inst

Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:37:18PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt to build it failed with: Do you have 'bc' in build requirements

Re: Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:11:34PM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote: Hey, You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc. That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found that it was bc that missing

Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 05:37:18PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to > > do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt > > to build it failed with: > >

Re: Re: building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:11:34PM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Thursday 25 September 2014 11:09:47 Sven Hoexter wrote: Hey, > > You rock! Thanks, it was indeed a missing build-depedency on bc. > > That requirement is there for all the 2.1.x releases. Until I found th

building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

Hi, I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt to build it failed with: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I.. -I../../src -pthread -I/usr/include/enchant -I/usr/include/glib-2.0

building 2.1.2 failed on Debian/unstable

Hi, I just tried to jump in before the next Debian freeze and tried to do an ad-hoc bump of the LyX package to 2.1.2. Sadly my naive attempt to build it failed with: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src -I.. -I../../src -pthread -I/usr/include/enchant -I/usr/include/glib-2.0

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:23:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hi, i have a question for people on various linux distros. does hunspell dictionaries and thesaurus working on your box automatically? (now i mean vanilla lyx, not packages already fixed by distro packagers). I've no idea about

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:03:39PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: I've no idea about hunspell spell checking, I would've to try a build with hunspell. I switched the package to enchant only some time ago. For the thesaurus the default location does not work. i dont see any

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:23:01PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hi, > i have a question for people on various linux distros. does hunspell > dictionaries and thesaurus working on your box automatically? (now i mean > vanilla lyx, not packages already fixed by distro packagers). I've no idea about

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:03:39PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > I've no idea about hunspell spell checking, I would've to try a build with > > hunspell. I switched the package to enchant only some time ago. For the > > thesaurus the default location

[wiki] approve site password

Hi, I would appreciate it if someone would sent me the wiki password required to approve new links. Alternatively someone could just approve the changes made on http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Thanks in advanced, Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a

[wiki] approve site password

Hi, I would appreciate it if someone would sent me the wiki password required to approve new links. Alternatively someone could just approve the changes made on http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXOnDebian Thanks in advanced, Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a

Re: Bug#597676: Export options vanish every other time

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Brendon Higgins wrote: Hi, I currently fail to help with debugging this problem any further so maybe someone here has an idea how to proceed. Summary: Export options only appear when reconfigure just ran and LyX got restarted. After a second restart

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:47:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: On 10/05/2010 12:06 PM, Andrei Lomov wrote: I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze. No success, ./configure returns You've got the qt4-devel package installed, right? Dumb question, I'm sure,

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:35:32PM +0300, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Andrei Lomov lo...@math.nsc.ru wrote: I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze. No success, ./configure returns ** qt 4 library not found ! Did you try

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:06:25PM +0700, Andrei Lomov wrote: May be anywhere is the binary i686 LyX 1.5.7 (statically linked)? Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a Xen domU with

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:09:03PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a Xen domU with -static. (sounds scary? yes it is!) Hm passing -static via CXXFLAGS

Re: Bug#597676: Export options vanish every other time

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:12:56PM +1000, Brendon Higgins wrote: Hi, I currently fail to help with debugging this problem any further so maybe someone here has an idea how to proceed. Summary: Export options only appear when reconfigure just ran and LyX got restarted. After a second restart

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:47:48PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > On 10/05/2010 12:06 PM, Andrei Lomov wrote: > >I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze. > >No success, ./configure returns > > > You've got the qt4-devel package installed, right? Dumb question, > I'm

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:35:32PM +0300, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Andrei Lomov wrote: > > I need LyX 1.5 for some reasons and try to compile it in debian squeeze. > > No success, ./configure returns > > > > > > ** qt 4 library not found ! > > >

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:06:25PM +0700, Andrei Lomov wrote: > May be anywhere is the binary i686 LyX 1.5.7 (statically linked)? Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a Xen domU with

Re: compilig 1.5.7 in squeeze?

On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:09:03PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Just for fun I've build a 1.5.7 package based on the 1.5.5 package from > Lenny in a Lenny i386 pbuilder on a Lenny amd64 installation running in a > Xen domU with -static. (sounds scary? yes it is!) Hm passing -static via

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: Hi, Any idea what might have happened? I guess I should've forwarded http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332 but I never found a way to reproduce it. :( And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the

Re: LyX 1.6.7: Menus disappeared, got them back

On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 12:29:34PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: Hi, > Any idea what might have happened? I guess I should've forwarded http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=524332 but I never found a way to reproduce it. :( And yes it would be interesting to shed some light on the

collapsable vs. collapsible

Hi, this is so wide spread that I hesitate to sent a patch. I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible It's even in a file name src/insets/InsetCollapsable.cpp. Is someone interested to fix

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: We can go on ... Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this time ...) so far. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45: No

Re: collapsable vs. collapsible

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 08:23:21PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:10:55PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi Enrico, I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible

collapsable vs. collapsible

Hi, this is so wide spread that I hesitate to sent a patch. I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsable collapsible It's even in a file name src/insets/InsetCollapsable.cpp. Is someone interested to fix

Re: LyX 1.6.7

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:53:54PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > We can go on ... Debian/unstable i386: Builds, works (tested spellchecking with enchant this time ...) so far. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45:

Re: collapsable vs. collapsible

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 08:23:21PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 07:10:55PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi Enrico, > > I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lyx collapsable collapsible > > I: lyx: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/tex2lyx collapsa

Re: Spellcheck in 1.6.6 misses every second word

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:09PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi, Can you please report this as LyX bug? Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6708 Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: Spellcheck in 1.6.6 misses every second word

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:52:09PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi, > Can you please report this as LyX bug? Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/6708 Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in peace [The Cardigans - 03:45: No sleep]

Re: 1.6.6

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: I've put the tarballs here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.gz ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.bz2 Please test, build, report back. Build and seems to work with my

Re: 1.6.6

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi, Please keep branch in freeze until we know 1.6.6 is OK. Oh and lintian again found a common misspelling in the source ... Maybe you'd like to apply this for 1.6.7. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay

Re: 1.6.6

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > I've put the tarballs here: > > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.gz > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/lyx-1.6.6.tar.bz2 > > Please test, build, report back. Build and seems to work with

Re: 1.6.6

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:11:16PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi, > Please keep branch in freeze until we know 1.6.6 is OK. Oh and lintian again found a common misspelling in the source ... Maybe you'd like to apply this for 1.6.7. Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say

Re: r34002 - lyx-devel/trunk

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: Maybe, I don't understand this well enough, but anyway, why do we require automake 1.10.1 for everyone ? Even for people not using make dist or the tarball at all. automake 1.10.1 will fail

Re: r34002 - lyx-devel/trunk

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: > > Maybe, I don't understand this well enough, but anyway, why do we > > require automake 1.10.1 for everyone ? Even for people not using make > > dist or the tarball at all. > > automake < 1.10.1

Re: Python 3

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:27:17AM +0100, José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 30 March 2010 14:37:24 Pavel Sanda wrote: hi, anybody already using python 3 with lyx? what is the situation with different distros and our compatibility with 3? (gentoo has 3(.1) still in testing but slowly moving

Re: Python 3

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:27:17AM +0100, José Matos wrote: > On Tuesday 30 March 2010 14:37:24 Pavel Sanda wrote: > > hi, > > > > anybody already using python 3 with lyx? > > what is the situation with different distros and our compatibility with 3? > > (gentoo has 3(.1) still in testing but

Re: I can´ t run lyx 2.0.0 alpha 1

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Marcelo Acuña wrote: I have debian lenny with g++ 4.3.2, qt 4.6.2. Usually, you use a different run-time version of Qt as the one you used in the compilation. Vincent I have only one qt installed. Since Debian/Lenny shipped with Qt

Re: I can´ t run lyx 2.0.0 alpha 1

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:28:45PM -0700, Marcelo Acuña wrote: > > > I have debian lenny with g++ 4.3.2, qt 4.6.2. > > > > Usually, you use a different run-time version of Qt as the > > one you used in the compilation. > > > > Vincent > > I have only one qt installed. Since Debian/Lenny

Re: IRC channel

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:48:21PM -0400, rgheck wrote: On 03/18/2010 05:45 PM, venom00 wrote: Hi! Why don't you create a IRC chan for quick discussions? It would be very interesting! Maybe on Freenode. Let me know! Do you know how to create such a thing? If so, please do, and then post

Re: IRC channel

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:48:21PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > On 03/18/2010 05:45 PM, venom00 wrote: > >Hi! Why don't you create a IRC chan for quick discussions? It would be very > >interesting! Maybe on Freenode. > >Let me know! > > > Do you know how to create such a thing? If so, please do, and

Linking with gold

Hi, a few weeks ago we received a bugreport that LyX currently fails to link with gold in Debian (Google provided a new implementation of ld some time ago for those who haven't heard of it so far). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=80 This is not much of an issue currently and

Linking with gold

Hi, a few weeks ago we received a bugreport that LyX currently fails to link with gold in Debian (Google provided a new implementation of ld some time ago for those who haven't heard of it so far). http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=80 This is not much of an issue currently and

Small spelling fixes

Hi, while packaging the 1.6.5 release lintian, one the Debian helpers to check your package, noted some small spelling errors in the binary. I tried to track them down without fixing them in other places like comments aswell. Would be nice if someone could commit them to trunk and branch for

Small spelling fixes

Hi, while packaging the 1.6.5 release lintian, one the Debian helpers to check your package, noted some small spelling errors in the binary. I tried to track them down without fixing them in other places like comments aswell. Would be nice if someone could commit them to trunk and branch for

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.5 [status update #1]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi, So it seems we have resolved almost all critical bugs, and in view of the large list of changes, I think we should get out LyX 1.6.5 soon. [...] Objections? Any bugs that should be considered in your opinion? Vincent? I

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.5 [status update #1]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi, > So it seems we have resolved almost all critical bugs, and in view of the > large list of changes, I think we should get out LyX 1.6.5 soon. [...] > Objections? Any bugs that should be considered in your opinion? Vincent?

Math crash - Debian bug #548519 with patch

Hi, I've nearly no time currently so it would be amazing if one of you guys could take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548519 It's a crash, plus backtrace and a proposed patch by Jonas Baggett. Thanks, Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed,

Math crash - Debian bug #548519 with patch

Hi, I've nearly no time currently so it would be amazing if one of you guys could take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548519 It's a crash, plus backtrace and a proposed patch by Jonas Baggett. Thanks, Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed,

Re: LyX Won't Run Inplace with Gcc 4.4, Boost =1.37, Qt = 4.5.1

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Note that LyX does run fine when make-installed. this means segfault? Idea: Is this a general problem with the without-included-boost and run-in-place combination? wasn't confirmed that external or

Re: LyX Won't Run Inplace with Gcc 4.4, Boost =1.37, Qt = 4.5.1

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, If I remember my tests correctly 1.6.3 with ext-boost 1.38.0, Qt 4.5.2 and gcc-4.4 worked but I'll better run that build again to be sure. This definetly works. Branch with the same libs and compiler doesn't work

Re: LyX Won't Run "Inplace" with Gcc 4.4, Boost >=1.37, Qt >= 4.5.1

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > > Note that LyX does run fine when make-installed. > > this means segfault? > > > Idea: Is this a general problem with the "without-included-boost" and > > run-in-place combination? > > wasn't confirmed that

Re: LyX Won't Run "Inplace" with Gcc 4.4, Boost >=1.37, Qt >= 4.5.1

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:54PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > If I remember my tests correctly 1.6.3 with ext-boost 1.38.0, Qt 4.5.2 and > gcc-4.4 > worked but I'll better run that build again to be sure. This definetly works. Branch with the same libs and compiler doe

Re: Trunk Won't Run in F11

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:02:50PM -0400, rgheck wrote: This is a fresh install of F11, and I've done a fresh checkout of the tree, too. When I try to run trunk (in place, as I've not installed it), I get a segfault. Thus: I see the same problem for branch. Build with gcc 4.4, external boost

Re: Trunk Won't Run in F11

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:02:50PM -0400, rgheck wrote: > > This is a fresh install of F11, and I've done a fresh checkout of > the tree, too. When I try to run trunk (in place, as I've not > installed it), I get a segfault. Thus: I see the same problem for branch. Build with gcc 4.4, external

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi, Attached is a patch to get the desired behaviour. Works here[tm]. ;) No objections from me (once 1.6.4svn is open again). Ok now that 1.6.3 is released here's a fresh version of the changes. Would be nice if someone

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:11:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Ok now that 1.6.3 is released here's a fresh version of the changes. Would be nice if someone could commit it. its in pavel Thanks. Sven -- forevermore

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi, > > Attached is a patch to get the desired behaviour. Works here[tm]. ;) > > No objections from me (once 1.6.4svn is open again). Ok now that 1.6.3 is released here's a fresh version of the changes. Would be nice if

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:11:38PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Ok now that 1.6.3 is released here's a fresh version > > of the changes. Would be nice if someone could commit it. > > its in > pavel Thanks. Sven -- forevermore

Re: [Patch] Use xdg-open to open files in default applications

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:28:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 15/06/2009 15:01, Rex Dieter a écrit : to sum it up: i'm completely against that for majority of users this works others will fix it themselves. It's fair to say that we agree to disagree at this point, and that's fine.

Re: [Patch] Use xdg-open to open files in default applications

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:28:25PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 15/06/2009 15:01, Rex Dieter a écrit : >>> to sum it up: i'm completely against that "for majority of users this >>> works others will fix it themselves." >> >> It's fair to say that we agree to disagree at this point, and

Re: [Patch] Use xdg-open to open files in default applications

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, Is xdg-open now fixed/enhanced to solve the mentioned problems? i have asked in bugzilla without success and was tired to fight for it on their devel list. According to https://bugs.freedesktop.org

Re: [Patch] Use xdg-open to open files in default applications

On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, > > Is xdg-open now fixed/enhanced to solve the mentioned problems? > > i have asked in bugzilla without success and was tired to fight for it > on their devel list. According to https://bu

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, would it be feasible to search for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py? Maybe I missed something but just this morning it all seems to be a lot easier. Attached is a patch to get the desired behaviour. Works here[tm]. ;) Sven

Re: [Patch] Use xdg-open to open files in default applications

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:28:21PM +, Frederik Himpe wrote: Mandriva includes this patch to open files in the default applications in the user's desktop with xdg-open. Maybe you want to include this patch in the official sources. Debian and Fedora too. See this thread for the discussion:

Re: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > Hi, > would it be feasible to search for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py? Maybe I missed something but just this morning it all seems to be a lot easier. Attached is a patch to get the desired behaviour. Works h

Re: [Patch] Use xdg-open to open files in default applications

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 06:28:21PM +, Frederik Himpe wrote: > Mandriva includes this patch to open files in the default applications in > the user's desktop with xdg-open. Maybe you want to include this patch in > the official sources. Debian and Fedora too. See this thread for the

Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

Hi, would it be feasible to search for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py? I don't know how other distributions handle software written in scripting languages which reside somewhere in a bin or sbin directory but in Debian filetype extensions are removed. For now I've added a patch to the

Seaching for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py?

Hi, would it be feasible to search for elyxer.py and elyxer in configure.py? I don't know how other distributions handle software written in scripting languages which reside somewhere in a bin or sbin directory but in Debian filetype extensions are removed. For now I've added a patch to the

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.3 [status update #2]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23:56PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: I don't know what other distributions currently do with relation to the boost changes. At least Fedora seems to provide the single threaded version with the old naming and the multi threaded version

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.3 [status update #2]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23:56PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > I don't know what other distributions currently do with relation to the > > boost > > changes. At least Fedora seems to provide the single threaded version with > > the old naming and

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.3 [status update #2]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Hi, I learned that Sven Hoexter has already a workaround, so I believe it can wait for 1.6.4. I'm just adding the -mt suffix in all .in and the common.am file. This doesn't ensure any portability it just keeps it building

Re: Approaching LyX 1.6.3 [status update #2]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:02:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Hi, > I learned that Sven Hoexter has already a workaround, so I believe it can > wait for 1.6.4. I'm just adding the -mt suffix in all .in and the common.am file. This doesn't ensure any portability it just keeps it bu

Re: Official submission of eLyXer for inclusion in LyX

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:52:09AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2009-04-29, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi, For Linux distributions this would mean a recommendation or suggestion in the lyx package. (Hopefully there will be an elyxer Debian package soon.) These terms (recommends and suggests)

Re: Official submission of eLyXer for inclusion in LyX

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:52:09AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2009-04-29, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi, > For Linux distributions this would mean a "recommendation" or > "suggestion" in the lyx package. (Hopefully there will be an elyxer > Debian package soon.) These terms (recommends and

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:13:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 15/03/2009 11:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Bad. But fair enough for the moment. Just

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:13:49PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > On 15/03/2009 11:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Sven Hoexter wrote: >> >>> Now I just need to meet you to verify your key or find a trustpath to >>> you. :) Hm no sigs on the key. Ba

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi Juergen, LyX 1.6.2 is here: ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be sufficient? Sure. Thanks. Now I just need to meet you

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Hi, No point in wasting effort if all you where objecting like mad... Not that I'm objecting in any way but I guess that all old links to the bugreports will break or is there some mod_rewrite voodoo possible to retain the

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 03:16:24PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Hi Juergen, > LyX 1.6.2 is here: > ftp://ftp.devel.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your system? Sven -- If God passed a mic to me to speak I'd say stay in bed, world Sleep in

Re: LyX 1.6.2

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Sven Hoexter wrote: > > Is it possible to post the sha-/md5sum for the tarball on your > > system? > > I intend to post the attached signatures on ftp.lyx.org. Would that be > sufficient? Sure.

Re: Trac instead of bugzilla.

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Hi, > No point in wasting effort if all you where objecting like mad... Not that I'm objecting in any way but I guess that all old links to the bugreports will break or is there some mod_rewrite voodoo possible to retain the

Re: Interest in using git with lyx svn

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:22:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Hi, | I need to upgrade that server to Centos 5.2, but once that's done You are aware that Centos 5.3 will be out in a couple of weeks? In almost all cases that will be a rather smooth upgrade. I've some RHEL 5 here

Re: Interest in using git with lyx svn

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org writes: Hi, In this respect, I'd favor hosting from free software projects like alioth (debian), launchpad (ubuntu,although this is a company) or savannah (GNU). Alioth is strictly

Re: Interest in using git with lyx svn

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:56:06AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: Hi, My favourite is berlios.de, an advertisement-free, clean open-source forge with bug-tracking, GIT and other tools (see http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=26group_id=2 for details). AFAIK Joerg Schilling

Re: Interest in using git with lyx svn

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:22:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: Hi, > | I need to upgrade that server to Centos 5.2, but once that's done > > You are aware that Centos 5.3 will be out in a couple of weeks? In almost all cases that will be a rather smooth upgrade. I've some RHEL 5 here

Re: Interest in using git with lyx svn

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:10:53AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes: Hi, > In this respect, I'd favor hosting from free software projects like > alioth (debian), launchpad (ubuntu,although this is a company) or > savannah (GNU). Alioth is

Re: Interest in using git with lyx svn

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:56:06AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: Hi, > My favourite is berlios.de, an advertisement-free, clean open-source > forge with bug-tracking, GIT and other tools (see > http://developer.berlios.de/docman/display_doc.php?docid=26_id=2 > for details). AFAIK Joerg Schilling

Re: Fix for some warnings in the tex2lyx.1 manpage

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hi, Sven, have you looked on it again or should we put the original patch into the tree? Nope sorry. If you like you can put in the original patch or just let it be. I'll rewrite/reformat the whole thing when I've some spare time.

Re: Fix for some warnings in the tex2lyx.1 manpage

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: Hi, > Sven, have you looked on it again or should we put the original patch > into the tree? Nope sorry. If you like you can put in the original patch or just let it be. I'll rewrite/reformat the whole thing when I've some spare

Re: Fix for some warnings in the tex2lyx.1 manpage

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:03:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de writes: Hi, With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed. $ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 /dev/null standard input:43: warning: `Tr' not defined standard

Re: Fix for some warnings in the tex2lyx.1 manpage

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:03:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > "Sven Hoexter" <s...@timegate.de> writes: Hi, > > With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed. > > $ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 >/dev/null > >

Fix for some warnings in the tex2lyx.1 manpage

Hi, attached is a small patch to set the comments right in the tex2lyx manpage. With this patch applied there are only two warnings waiting to be fixed. $ LANG=C man --warnings -l tex2lyx.1 /dev/null standard input:43: warning: `Tr' not defined standard input:584: warning: `IX' not defined For

Re: Fix for some warnings in the tex2lyx.1 manpage

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 02:16:30PM -0500, rgheck wrote: Sven Hoexter wrote: Hi, attached is a small patch to set the comments right in the tex2lyx manpage. I'm happy to commit this, but someone who actually knows about this should have a quick look first. Ok. If you look through

  1   2   3   >