Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-04-09 Thread pdv
In article 515e8cdf.5010...@lyx.org, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 29/03/2013 20:52, pdv a écrit : I didn't know about rowBreakPoint(). At some point I thought about keeping a list of positions, but discarded the idea somehow. Even with this new code the scrolling

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-04-09 Thread pdv
In article <515e8cdf.5010...@lyx.org>, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 29/03/2013 20:52, pdv a écrit : > > I didn't know about rowBreakPoint(). > > At some point I thought about keeping a list of positions, but discarded > > the idea

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1) - LyXscrollpatch20130401.diff (1/1)

2013-04-01 Thread pdv
In article pdvisschere-de7c0b.20523629032...@news.gmane.org, pdv pdvissch...@edpnet.be wrote: In article 51506c02.8040...@lyx.org, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 25/03/2013 16:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : In case you are interested in working more on this coe

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1) - LyXscrollpatch20130401.diff (1/1)

2013-04-01 Thread pdv
In article <pdvisschere-de7c0b.20523629032...@news.gmane.org>, pdv <pdvissch...@edpnet.be> wrote: > In article <51506c02.8040...@lyx.org>, > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > > > Le 25/03/2013 16:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-03-29 Thread pdv
In article 51506a27.3060...@lyx.org, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 22/03/2013 12:59, pdv a écrit : Hi everyone, I've developed a patch which solves the scrolling issue on OS X. I assume that there have been different scrolling issues but the one I'm referring

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-03-29 Thread pdv
In article 51506c02.8040...@lyx.org, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote: Le 25/03/2013 16:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : In case you are interested in working more on this coe, here are a few remarks: And another one: * How come you do not touch

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-03-29 Thread pdv
In article <51506a27.3060...@lyx.org>, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 22/03/2013 12:59, pdv a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > > > I've developed a patch which solves the scrolling issue on "OS X". > > I assume that there hav

Re: patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-03-29 Thread pdv
In article <51506c02.8040...@lyx.org>, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 25/03/2013 16:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > In case you are interested in working more on this coe, here are a few > > remarks: > > And another one: > > * How come you do not touch

patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-03-22 Thread pdv
Hi everyone, I've developed a patch which solves the scrolling issue on OS X. I assume that there have been different scrolling issues but the one I'm referring to is the one diagnosed by Stephan Witt (LyX developer list 18 may 2011, Stephan Witt) It isn't a bug, it's a feature. Qt4.7 renders

patch for scrolling issue - LyXscrollpatch20130302.diff (1/1)

2013-03-22 Thread pdv
Hi everyone, I've developed a patch which solves the scrolling issue on "OS X". I assume that there have been different scrolling issues but the one I'm referring to is the one diagnosed by Stephan Witt > (LyX developer list 18 may 2011, Stephan Witt) > It isn't a bug, it's a feature. Qt4.7

Re: cmake, Xcode and ppc

2008-09-20 Thread pdv
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 10 September 2008 22:56:57 pdv wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [...] I would expect that this should be 0 because it is the current value, no? I suppose it doesn't matter; it is sufficient

Re: cmake, Xcode and ppc

2008-09-20 Thread pdv
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 10 September 2008 22:56:57 pdv wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [...] > > > I would expect that this should be 0 because it is the current value,

<    1   2