[PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

This patch revert part of the code changed in revision 18825. This is needed because there is no lyx_view_ when exporting at the command-line. OK? Abdel. Index: InsetInclude.cpp === --- InsetInclude.cpp(revision 19003) +++

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Abdelrazak This patch revert part of the code changed in revision Abdelrazak 18825. This is needed because there is no lyx_view_ when Abdelrazak exporting at the command-line. Why is the lyx_view_ needed? Also, I know it does not come

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Abdelrazak This patch revert part of the code changed in revision Abdelrazak 18825. This is needed because there is no lyx_view_ when Abdelrazak exporting at the command-line. Why is the lyx_view_ needed?

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why is the lyx_view_ needed? Abdelrazak LFUN_BUFFER_CHILD_OPEN uses LyXView::loadLyXFile() because Abdelrazak of outline, tabbar, etc. OK. Abdelrazak Note that Richard asked for comment at the time. Sure, but he did not point to

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:56:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak But for the time being, let's please get 1.5.0 out. Sure. In this respect, your patch is OK. +1 -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:56:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak But for the time being, let's please get 1.5.0 out. Sure. In this respect, your patch is OK. +1 Done, thanks.

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak Note that Richard asked for comment at the time. Sure, but he did not point to this particular feature :) IIRC he asked what was the correct syntax for argument but nobody (including me) answered him. Abdelrazak I agree and I already started to take

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Abdelrazak Note that Richard asked for comment at the time. Sure, but he did not point to this particular feature :) I'm pretty sure he did:

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Richard == Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard I'm pretty sure he did: Richard http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg120884.html. [PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again Richard Heck Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:14:39 -0700 Hey, that's not fair! I was busy preparing a garden party

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Hey, that's not fair! I was busy preparing a garden party for 80 people! To be fair, some of the messages in the thread are familiar to me... Richard Indeed, how to define the optional argument was one of the Richard major issues. (The other option was a new LFUN.)

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Richard == Richard Heck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Richard And there's a similar question about the citation-insert code Richard that precedes. It'd be quite easy at this point to do the Richard enhancement mentioned there, but there's a question about the Richard format of the command. We

[PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

This patch revert part of the code changed in revision 18825. This is needed because there is no lyx_view_ when exporting at the command-line. OK? Abdel. Index: InsetInclude.cpp === --- InsetInclude.cpp(revision 19003) +++

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> This patch revert part of the code changed in revision Abdelrazak> 18825. This is needed because there is no lyx_view_ when Abdelrazak> exporting at the command-line. Why is the lyx_view_ needed? Also, I know it

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> This patch revert part of the code changed in revision Abdelrazak> 18825. This is needed because there is no lyx_view_ when Abdelrazak> exporting at the command-line. Why is the lyx_view_

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why is the lyx_view_ needed? Abdelrazak> LFUN_BUFFER_CHILD_OPEN uses LyXView::loadLyXFile() because Abdelrazak> of outline, tabbar, etc. OK. Abdelrazak> Note that Richard asked for comment at the time. Sure, but he did

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:56:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Abdelrazak> But for the time being, let's please get 1.5.0 out. > > Sure. In this respect, your patch is OK. +1 -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

José Matos wrote: On Tuesday 10 July 2007 15:56:04 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak> But for the time being, let's please get 1.5.0 out. Sure. In this respect, your patch is OK. +1 Done, thanks.

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Abdelrazak> Note that Richard asked for comment at the time. Sure, but he did not point to this particular "feature" :) IIRC he asked what was the correct syntax for argument but nobody (including me) answered him. Abdelrazak> I agree and I already started to

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Note that Richard asked for comment at the time. Sure, but he did not point to this particular "feature" :) I'm pretty sure he did:

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> I'm pretty sure he did: Richard> http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg120884.html. >[PATCH] Child TOC Crash, Again >Richard Heck >Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:14:39 -0700 Hey, that's not fair! I was busy preparing a

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Hey, that's not fair! I was busy preparing a garden party for 80 people! To be fair, some of the messages in the thread are familiar to me... Richard> Indeed, how to define the optional argument was one of the Richard> major issues. (The other option was a new

Re: [PATCH] Fix crash exporting a multi-part document at the command-line

> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> And there's a similar question about the citation-insert code Richard> that precedes. It'd be quite easy at this point to do the Richard> enhancement mentioned there, but there's a question about the Richard> format of the