Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Use this paragraph's default alignment (Justified)
That's fine with me, though I'd suggest the instead of this, as that
is OK for the multi-paragraph case, too.
Oh no, please don't. Use tooltips for verbose hints (you can't imagine how
long this
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
"Use this paragraph's default alignment (Justified)"
That's fine with me, though I'd suggest "the" instead of "this", as that
is OK for the multi-paragraph case, too.
Oh no, please don't. Use tooltips for verbose hints (you can't imagine how
The attached patch deals with most of the remaining issues with the
Paragraph Settings dialog, after the long discussion about how to do it.
I've redesigned the dialog itself in accord with some ideas of Edwin's,
adapting also some suggestions of Helge's. A screenshot is attached.
This
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with most of the remaining issues with the
Paragraph Settings dialog, after the long discussion about how to do it.
I've redesigned the dialog itself in accord with some ideas of Edwin's,
adapting also some
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:55:01 Edwin Leuven wrote:
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Nope. If there is a consensus about this patch I will consider it for post
rc2.
--
José Abílio
Richard Heck wrote:
changes the label to Default for Current Paragraph---I think that
makes it a little clearer to users what this does---and makes some
space for adding (Justifed) without alignment issues.
May I suggest to name it
Built-in Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:55:01 Edwin Leuven wrote:
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Nope. If there is a consensus about this patch I will consider it for post
rc2.
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem? ;-)
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem? ;-)
none really, i just thought i noticed some inconsistency between this
mail and a
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
instead? If you don't like the word Built-in, then please make it
Default Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
to make it *extra* clear what default we are talking about. There is
room enough, according to the screen shot.
or even more verbose:
Use
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:38:01PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem?
;-)
none really, i
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
instead? If you don't like the word Built-in, then please make it
Default Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
to make it *extra* clear what default we are talking about. There is
room enough, according to the screen shot.
or even
Richard Heck wrote:
Use this paragraph's default alignment (Justified)
That's fine with me, though I'd suggest the instead of this, as that
is OK for the multi-paragraph case, too.
Oh no, please don't. Use tooltips for verbose hints (you can't imagine how
long this label will be in the
The attached patch deals with most of the remaining issues with the
Paragraph Settings dialog, after the long discussion about how to do it.
I've redesigned the dialog itself in accord with some ideas of Edwin's,
adapting also some suggestions of Helge's. A screenshot is attached.
This
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with most of the remaining issues with the
Paragraph Settings dialog, after the long discussion about how to do it.
I've redesigned the dialog itself in accord with some ideas of Edwin's,
adapting also some
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:55:01 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Nope. If there is a consensus about this patch I will consider it for post
rc2.
--
José Abílio
Richard Heck wrote:
changes the label to "Default for Current Paragraph"---I think that
> makes it a little clearer to users what this does---and makes some
> space for adding "(Justifed)" without alignment issues.
May I suggest to name it
Built-in Alignment for Current Paragraph
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 18:55:01 Edwin Leuven wrote:
perhaps this can make it into rc2?
Nope. If there is a consensus about this patch I will consider it for post
rc2.
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem? ;-)
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem? ;-)
none really, i just thought i noticed some inconsistency between this
mail and a
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
instead? If you don't like the word Built-in, then please make it
Default Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
to make it *extra* clear what default we are talking about. There is
room enough, according to the screen shot.
or even more verbose:
"Use
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 08:38:01PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> >On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:56 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> >>i thought you established the consensus by your coin toss?
> >
> >So that just means that I will toss the coin again, what is the problem?
> >;-)
>
> none
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote:
instead? If you don't like the word Built-in, then please make it
Default Alignment for Current Paragraph (Justified)
to make it *extra* clear what default we are talking about. There is
room enough, according to the screen shot.
or even
Richard Heck wrote:
> > "Use this paragraph's default alignment (Justified)"
>
> That's fine with me, though I'd suggest "the" instead of "this", as that
> is OK for the multi-paragraph case, too.
Oh no, please don't. Use tooltips for verbose hints (you can't imagine how
long this label will be
24 matches
Mail list logo
