José, I'd like to apply this patch. I agree with Jean-Marc that this whole
bibitem handling is a mess (and the patch is thus not really nice), but it
seems we're not gonna find anything better for 1.5 (see discussion on
bugzilla).
OK?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 07:49:38 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
OK?
Yes.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
José, I'd like to apply this patch. I agree with Jean-Marc that this whole
bibitem handling is a mess (and the patch is thus not really nice), but it
seems we're not gonna find anything better for 1.5 (see discussion on
bugzilla).
OK?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
On Monday 14 May 2007 07:49:38 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> OK?
Yes.
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
Jürgen == Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jürgen Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tested this ans it works fine.
Jürgen Good! Thanks.
Please apply.
Jürgen First, I'd like to hear something from Jean-Marc or someone
Jürgen else who is familiar with the par merging stuff.
I'll take a closer
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I'll take a closer look as soon as I can,
thanks.
but I am not sure what
handleBibitem does from a cursory glance.
it does the necessary things after backspace and delete, if bibitems are
involved. Mainly:
- if the bibitem itself has been deleted (this is
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> I tested this ans it works fine.
Jürgen> Good! Thanks.
>> Please apply.
Jürgen> First, I'd like to hear something from Jean-Marc or someone
Jürgen> else who is familiar with the par merging stuff.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I'll take a closer look as soon as I can,
thanks.
> but I am not sure what
> handleBibitem does from a cursory glance.
it does the necessary things after backspace and delete, if bibitems are
involved. Mainly:
- if the bibitem itself has been deleted (this is
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
This patch addresses this bug in form of some rather ugly additional checks:
if a bibitem is deleted, the paragraph will be merged with the preceeding
par, if that's a bibitem par as well, else it will be reset to default.
I tested this ans it
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I tested this ans it works fine.
Good! Thanks.
Please apply.
First, I'd like to hear something from Jean-Marc or someone else who is
familiar with the par merging stuff.
Jürgen
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
>
> This patch addresses this bug in form of some rather ugly additional checks:
> if a bibitem is deleted, the paragraph will be merged with the preceeding
> par, if that's a bibitem par as well, else it will be reset to default.
I tested this ans
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I tested this ans it works fine.
Good! Thanks.
> Please apply.
First, I'd like to hear something from Jean-Marc or someone else who is
familiar with the par merging stuff.
Jürgen
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
This patch addresses this bug in form of some rather ugly additional checks:
if a bibitem is deleted, the paragraph will be merged with the preceeding
par, if that's a bibitem par as well, else it will be reset to default.
Furthermore, it is checked
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
This patch addresses this bug in form of some rather ugly additional checks:
if a bibitem is deleted, the paragraph will be merged with the preceeding
par, if that's a bibitem par as well, else it will be reset to default.
Furthermore, it is checked
14 matches
Mail list logo
