Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 14:40 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I tested it and it seems to work and I think you should apply it to
1.4. The best would be to ask people who reported bugs to test it.
It is only one file to put un user
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 14:40 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> I tested it and it seems to work and I think you should apply it to
>> 1.4. The best would be to ask people who reported bugs to test it.
>> It is only one file to put
Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 14:40 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I tested it and it seems to work and I think you should apply it to
1.4. The best would be to ask people who reported bugs to test it. It
is only one file to put un user directory, after all.
I just did that.
I propose to apply
Am Freitag, 31. März 2006 14:40 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> I tested it and it seems to work and I think you should apply it to
> 1.4. The best would be to ask people who reported bugs to test it. It
> is only one file to put un user directory, after all.
I just did that.
> I propose to
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg That would be like the attached then. I will put this in trunk
Georg tomorrow if nobody objects, but I would really like somebody to
Georg test it.
I tested it and it seems to work and I think you should apply it to
1.4. The best would be to
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> That would be like the attached then. I will put this in trunk
Georg> tomorrow if nobody objects, but I would really like somebody to
Georg> test it.
I tested it and it seems to work and I think you should apply it to
1.4. The best
Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum:
That would be like the attached then. I will put this in trunk tomorrow
if
nobody objects, but I would really like somebody to test it.
I did that now.
Log:
* lib/scripts/layout2layout.py
(concatenate_label): new,
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum:
That would be like the attached then. I will put this in trunk
tomorrow if
nobody objects, but I would really like somebody to test it.
Georg I did that now.
Thanks, I will test it for
Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum:
> That would be like the attached then. I will put this in trunk tomorrow
if
> nobody objects, but I would really like somebody to test it.
I did that now.
Log:
* lib/scripts/layout2layout.py
(concatenate_label): new,
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum:
>> That would be like the attached then. I will put this in trunk
>> tomorrow if
>> nobody objects, but I would really like somebody to test it.
Georg> I did that now.
Thanks, I
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Here comes the patch. It was a bit more work than I thought,
Georg but seems to work now. I also discovered and fixed a bug in the
Georg process: counter names must be in lowercase. People with custom
Georg layout files, please test this
Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 12:24 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Here comes the patch. It was a bit more work than I thought,
Georg but seems to work now. I also discovered and fixed a bug in the
Georg process: counter names must be in
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Here comes the patch. It was a bit more work than I thought,
Georg> but seems to work now. I also discovered and fixed a bug in the
Georg> process: counter names must be in lowercase. People with custom
Georg> layout files, please
Am Dienstag, 28. März 2006 12:24 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> Here comes the patch. It was a bit more work than I thought,
> Georg> but seems to work now. I also discovered and fixed a bug in the
> Georg> process: counter names
Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 15:23 schrieb Georg Baum:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Georg Is that the default behaviour in 1.3?
In 1.3, article-like numbering is hardcoded. If a labelstring exists,
it is prepended to the numbering. For
Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 15:23 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> "Georg" == Georg Baum
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> writes:
> > Georg> Is that the default behaviour in 1.3?
> >
> > In 1.3, article-like numbering is hardcoded. If a labelstring exists,
> > it
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg The attached patch is the outcome of a discussion with
Georg Jean-Marc at http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2355. The
Georg problem is that I did not realize that TocLevel was a new
Georg keyword when I wrote layout2layout.
Georg This
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It looks good. Are you sure that MaxCounter can be Counter_enumi+?
I don't know. I simply looked up the valid counter names. These maxcounter
levels are not used lateron anyway, but I added them because I wanted to
have something else than 0 in this case.
Other
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It looks good. Are you sure that MaxCounter can be Counter_enumi+?
Georg I don't know. I simply looked up the valid counter names. These
Georg maxcounter levels are not used lateron anyway, but I added them
Georg
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Georg == Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Georg Is that the default behaviour in 1.3?
In 1.3, article-like numbering is hardcoded. If a labelstring exists,
it is prepended to the numbering. For example, for chapter:
LabelString Chapter
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg As I wrote in the bug report: I will have a look why this was
Georg separated in the first place.
I remember that in Anre's initial version, the ToCLevel were different
between article and report class. I guess this is why they got
separated.
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> The attached patch is the outcome of a discussion with
Georg> Jean-Marc at http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2355. The
Georg> problem is that I did not realize that TocLevel was a new
Georg> keyword when I wrote layout2layout.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It looks good. Are you sure that MaxCounter can be Counter_enumi+?
I don't know. I simply looked up the valid counter names. These maxcounter
levels are not used lateron anyway, but I added them because I wanted to
have something else than 0 in this case.
> Other
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It looks good. Are you sure that MaxCounter can be Counter_enumi+?
Georg> I don't know. I simply looked up the valid counter names. These
Georg> maxcounter levels are not used lateron anyway, but I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
> Georg> Is that the default behaviour in 1.3?
>
> In 1.3, article-like numbering is hardcoded. If a labelstring exists,
> it is prepended to the numbering. For example, for chapter:
>
>
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> As I wrote in the bug report: I will have a look why this was
Georg> separated in the first place.
I remember that in Anre's initial version, the ToCLevel were different
between article and report class. I guess this is why they got
The attached patch is the outcome of a discussion with Jean-Marc at
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2355. The problem is that I did
not realize that TocLevel was a new keyword when I wrote layout2layout.
This patch adds this keyword for sectioning styles. Comments?
Georg
Index:
The attached patch is the outcome of a discussion with Jean-Marc at
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2355. The problem is that I did
not realize that TocLevel was a new keyword when I wrote layout2layout.
This patch adds this keyword for sectioning styles. Comments?
Georg
Index:
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:13, Georg Baum wrote:
line[-1:]
If you know that _line_ is not empty then line[-1] is enough.
As you already know line[-1:-1] is always empty, that was why the test
failled.
The advantage of using slices over array indices is that slices will work
always
On Monday 24 October 2005 15:13, Georg Baum wrote:
> line[-1:]
If you know that _line_ is not empty then line[-1] is enough.
As you already know line[-1:-1] is always empty, that was why the test
failled.
The advantage of using slices over array indices is that slices will work
always
This small patch fixes a problem in the layout file converter which was
discovered by Helge Hafting: It add an empty line after each line. This fix
is going in right now.
GeorgIndex: lib/ChangeLog
===
RCS file:
This small patch fixes a problem in the layout file converter which was
discovered by Helge Hafting: It add an empty line after each line. This fix
is going in right now.
GeorgIndex: lib/ChangeLog
===
RCS file:
32 matches
Mail list logo
