On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 10:33:34AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
which seems to be a qt issue btw. (incidentally, there seem to be
some dispatch problems in xforms; opening the citation dialog from
an inset is a real pain).
Andre has got a new job at the wrong time, it would appear ;-)
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 10:33:34AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > which seems to be a qt issue btw. (incidentally, there seem to be
> > some dispatch problems in xforms; opening the citation dialog from
> > an inset is a real pain).
>
> Andre has got a new job at the wrong time, it would appear
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
there.
Before we address that one,
which seems to be a qt issue btw.
Juergen, can you explain to me what the problem is and how to
reproduce it?
(incidentally, there seem to be
some dispatch
Angus Leeming wrote:
which seems to be a qt issue btw.
Juergen, can you explain to me what the problem is and how to
reproduce it?
You have to switch a document with existing citation insets from
natbib-authoryear to jurabib. Then click on an inset: The style in the combo
is wrong (off by
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Juergen, can you explain to me what the problem is and how to
reproduce it?
You have to switch a document with existing citation insets from
natbib-authoryear to jurabib. Then click on an inset: The style in
the combo is wrong (off by one).
Ok. And presumably this
Angus Leeming wrote:
Are there any other citation bugs
none that I am aware of ATM.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> > Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
>> > there.
>>
>> Before we address that one,
>
> which seems to be a qt issue btw.
Juergen, can you explain to me what the problem is and how to
reproduce it?
> (incidentally, there seem to be
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> > which seems to be a qt issue btw.
>
> Juergen, can you explain to me what the problem is and how to
> reproduce it?
You have to switch a document with existing citation insets from
natbib-authoryear to jurabib. Then click on an inset: The style in the combo
is wrong
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Juergen, can you explain to me what the problem is and how to
>> reproduce it?
>
> You have to switch a document with existing citation insets from
> natbib-authoryear to jurabib. Then click on an inset: The style in
> the combo is wrong (off by one).
Ok. And
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Are there any other citation bugs
none that I am aware of ATM.
Jürgen.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
there.
Before we address that one,
which seems to be a qt issue btw. (incidentally, there seem to be some
dispatch problems in xforms; opening the citation dialog from an inset is a
real pain).
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
there.
Before we address that one,
which seems to be a qt issue btw. (incidentally, there seem to be
some dispatch problems in xforms; opening the citation dialog from
an
Angus Leeming wrote:
You (the Qt guys) tend to use
multiple radio buttons where I would use a single choice. Is there a
rationale?
tooltips.
Jürgen.
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen Angus Leeming wrote:
You (the Qt guys) tend to use multiple radio buttons where I would
use a single choice. Is there a rationale?
Juergen tooltips.
One can always have a big tooltip that explains the different choices.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
One can always have a big tooltip that explains the different choices.
In the qt world, that would rather be a What's this? (which has not been
implemented yet).
Anyway, we have very much place on the bibliography pane, and therefore the
radio solution seems more
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
One can always have a big tooltip
There's no such thing as a big tooltip, so to speak...
john
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John wrote:
One can always have a big tooltip
John There's no such thing as a big tooltip, so to speak...
Indeed, it should be more like a 'what's this?' or whatever it's
called.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
> > there.
>
> Before we address that one,
which seems to be a qt issue btw. (incidentally, there seem to be some
dispatch problems in xforms; opening the citation dialog from an inset is a
real pain).
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
>> > there.
>>
>> Before we address that one,
>
> which seems to be a qt issue btw. (incidentally, there seem to be
> some dispatch problems in xforms; opening the citation
Angus Leeming wrote:
> You (the Qt guys) tend to use
> multiple radio buttons where I would use a single choice. Is there a
> rationale?
tooltips.
Jürgen.
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> You (the Qt guys) tend to use multiple radio buttons where I would
>> use a single choice. Is there a rationale?
Juergen> tooltips.
One can always have a big tooltip that explains the different
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> One can always have a big tooltip that explains the different choices.
In the qt world, that would rather be a "What's this?" (which has not been
implemented yet).
Anyway, we have very much place on the bibliography pane, and therefore the
radio solution seems more
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> One can always have a big tooltip
There's no such thing as a big tooltip, so to speak...
john
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> One can always have a big tooltip
John> There's no such thing as a big tooltip, so to speak...
Indeed, it should be more like a 'what's this?' or whatever
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Doh! Wrong patch! That was the old one you've already commented on.
Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
there.
Before we address that one, here's another clean-up patch. This one
stores a biblio::CiteEngine
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Doh! Wrong patch! That was the old one you've already commented on.
>
> Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still
> there.
Before we address that one, here's another clean-up patch. This one
stores a biblio::CiteEngine
Angus Leeming wrote:
attached is a patch that should help ensure the above requirement.
It's actually just a refactoring of existing code, even though it
looks pretty frightening.
No, it looks very reasonable and clean. Good idea!
If you'd be good enough to stress test it, that'd be great.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Doh! Wrong patch! That was the old one you've already commented on.
Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still there.
Regards,
Jürgen.
Angus Leeming wrote:
> attached is a patch that should help ensure the above requirement.
> It's actually just a refactoring of existing code, even though it
> looks pretty frightening.
No, it looks very reasonable and clean. Good idea!
> If you'd be good enough to stress test it, that'd be
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Doh! Wrong patch! That was the old one you've already commented on.
Angus, it works very well. Now only the off-by-one error is still there.
Regards,
Jürgen.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can be
backported to 1.3.x.
Angus, the output of the first two entries in the combox is reversed. I.e.,
the first entry (labelled [#ID]), produces \citet, which is Name [#ID]. The
second, labelled Name [#ID],
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can
be backported to 1.3.x.
Angus, the output of the first two entries in the combox is
reversed. I.e., the first entry (labelled [#ID]), produces \citet,
which is Name [#ID].
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Finally, since jurabib does not support numerical styles, jurabib
and numerical should be mutually exclusive (currently there is a
problem when switching from Jurabib/numerical to natbib).
Jürgen,
attached is a patch that should help ensure the above requirement.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Jürgen,
attached is a patch that should help ensure the above requirement.
It's actually just a refactoring of existing code, even though it
looks pretty frightening.
Doh! Wrong patch! That was the old one you've already commented on.
--
AngusIndex:
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can be
> backported to 1.3.x.
Angus, the output of the first two entries in the combox is reversed. I.e.,
the first entry (labelled [#ID]), produces \citet, which is "Name [#ID]". The
second, labelled Name
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can
>> be backported to 1.3.x.
>
> Angus, the output of the first two entries in the combox is
> reversed. I.e., the first entry (labelled [#ID]), produces \citet,
> which is
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Finally, since jurabib does not support numerical styles, jurabib
> and numerical should be mutually exclusive (currently there is a
> problem when switching from Jurabib/numerical to natbib).
Jürgen,
attached is a patch that should help ensure the above
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jürgen,
>
> attached is a patch that should help ensure the above requirement.
> It's actually just a refactoring of existing code, even though it
> looks pretty frightening.
Doh! Wrong patch! That was the old one you've already commented on.
--
AngusIndex:
Juergen,
I think that this patch fixes a bug report of yours: when using
natbib/jurabib and numerical citation style, it'd be nice if the
first entry in the list of possible citations in the dialog was
[#ID].
Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can be
backported to
Angus Leeming wrote:
Juergen,
I think that this patch fixes a bug report of yours: when using
natbib/jurabib and numerical citation style, it'd be nice if the
first entry in the list of possible citations in the dialog was
[#ID].
I didn't test it yet, But note that jurabib does not
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can
be backported to 1.3.x.
As soon as I return from Switzerland.
Thanks.
--
Angus
Juergen,
I think that this patch fixes a bug report of yours: when using
natbib/jurabib and numerical citation style, it'd be nice if the
first entry in the list of possible citations in the dialog was
[#ID].
Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can be
backported to
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Juergen,
>
> I think that this patch fixes a bug report of yours: when using
> natbib/jurabib and numerical citation style, it'd be nice if the
> first entry in the list of possible citations in the dialog was
> [#ID].
I didn't test it yet, But note that jurabib does not
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Could you check it out, please? If all is well I guess that it can
>> be backported to 1.3.x.
> As soon as I return from Switzerland.
Thanks.
--
Angus
44 matches
Mail list logo
