Re: --disable-shared

2007-09-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:46:03AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: When compiling with --disable-shared, it seems the shared libraries are being built and installed anyway, which wastes rather a lot of time. Could this be disabled? It shouldn't, and it didn't last time I tried. Is this a fairly

Re: --disable-shared

2007-09-20 Thread Richard Heck
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:46:03AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: When compiling with --disable-shared, it seems the shared libraries are being built and installed anyway, which wastes rather a lot of time. Could this be disabled? It shouldn't, and it didn't last time

Re: --disable-shared

2007-09-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:46:03AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > When compiling with --disable-shared, it seems the shared libraries are > being built and installed anyway, which wastes rather a lot of time. > Could this be disabled? It shouldn't, and it didn't last tim

Re: --disable-shared

2007-09-20 Thread Richard Heck
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:46:03AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: When compiling with --disable-shared, it seems the shared libraries are being built and installed anyway, which wastes rather a lot of time. Could this be disabled? It shouldn't, and it didn't last time

--disable-shared

2007-09-19 Thread Richard Heck
When compiling with --disable-shared, it seems the shared libraries are being built and installed anyway, which wastes rather a lot of time. Could this be disabled? rh -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown

--disable-shared

2007-09-19 Thread Richard Heck
When compiling with --disable-shared, it seems the shared libraries are being built and installed anyway, which wastes rather a lot of time. Could this be disabled? rh -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown