Re: Beta 1

On Monday, May 24, 2021 8:18:31 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > I have put tarballs for beta 1 here: > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp > =sharing > > I need to get my IP updated with our FTP people bef

Re: Beta 1

Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 22:49 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 20:17 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > >> Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < >> rikih...@lyx.org>: >> >>> Hi, all, >>> >>> I have put tarba

Re: Beta 1

Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 20:17 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org>: > >> Hi, all, >> >> I have put tarballs for beta 1 here: >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/drive/fo

Re: Beta 1

Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > Hi, all, > > I have put tarballs for beta 1 here: > > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing > > I need to get my IP updated wi

Re: Beta 1

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 03:18:31PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > I have put tarballs for beta 1 here: > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing Seems to work on several different debian versions. ANNOUNCE file

Re: Beta 1

Am Mo., 24. Mai 2021 um 21:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > Hi, all, > > I have put tarballs for beta 1 here: > > > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing > > I need to get my IP updated wi

Beta 1

Hi, all, I have put tarballs for beta 1 here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Zl_20mzi9ndDDQdzeFyvR07O4lLDtcW3?usp=sharing I need to get my IP updated with our FTP people before I can upload again to ftp.lyx.org. Usually that does not take too long. In any event, please prepare

Re: Beta 1

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 02:25:11AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > So how about a Beta 1 soon? Great idea, we should announce epub export available to get some testing. > I guess that means total feature freeze and only serious bug fixes in master. Feature freeze definitely, I would

Re: Beta 1

Le 11/04/2021 à 08:25, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Got kind of busy last month, but that has left some time for testing, and we seem not to have gotten too many reports of regressions. So how about a Beta 1 soon? I guess that means total feature freeze and only serious bug fixes in master

Beta 1

Got kind of busy last month, but that has left some time for testing, and we seem not to have gotten too many reports of regressions. So how about a Beta 1 soon? I guess that means total feature freeze and only serious bug fixes in master. Do we start translations then? with the understanding

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

Am Dienstag, dem 26.01.2021 um 10:32 +0200 schrieb Dr Eberhard Lisse: > to be honest ePub support is a killer feature (even for non- > publishing users like me) and hence I'd really would like to see it > making it into 2.4. With this argumentation a release can be delayed ad infinitum. Having

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

Jürgen, to be honest ePub support is a killer feature (even for non-publishing users like me) and hence I'd really would like to see it making it into 2.4. Alpha/Beta doesn't matter to me as I can't make the switch (new file structure?) until it is production ready (or 2.3.7 (?) can read 2.4

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

On Monday, January 25, 2021 6:59:02 PM WET Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > I would really like to ship an ePub export in 2.4, building upon the DocBook > export. I think I could work on that this week. In the interest of the discussion what needs to be done here? That is how do you intend to implement

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

Am Montag, dem 25.01.2021 um 19:52 + schrieb José Abílio Matos: > On Monday, January 25, 2021 7:26:34 PM WET Pavel Sanda wrote: > > But I don't think it matters much in the end, > > Pavel > > I agree with Pavel here. :-) Me, too. I would add that we shouldn't wait too long for new features.

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

On Monday, January 25, 2021 7:26:34 PM WET Pavel Sanda wrote: > But I don't think it matters much in the end, > Pavel I agree with Pavel here. :-) -- José Abílio-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:59:02PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > A couple fairly significant regressions have now been fixed in Alpha 1, > > so it looks like time to do another release. The default would be to go > > with Alpha 2. But, besides some missing layout files (my fault) and a > >

Re: Alpha 2? Beta 1?

On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 19:31, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > A couple fairly significant regressions have now been fixed in Alpha 1, > so it looks like time to do another release. The default would be to go > with Alpha 2. But, besides some missing layout files (my fault) and a >

Alpha 2? Beta 1?

Hi, all, A couple fairly significant regressions have now been fixed in Alpha 1, so it looks like time to do another release. The default would be to go with Alpha 2. But, besides some missing layout files (my fault) and a problem opening files, we have not had any serious bug reports from Alpha

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Kornel Benko wrote: > We may want to unify the output of msgmerge to possibly minimize the > differences in po-files. We tried and were not capable to unify it on Uwe's box, I am not going into the same debate again so it's completely your call. P

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Am Montag, 4. September 2017 um 02:28:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:11:55PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda > > > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > I did not make any

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:11:55PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Am Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 um 13:07:46, schrieb Pavel Sanda > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: > > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:07:46PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: > > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | git

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to > > worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: > > $ git diff-tree -r -c -M -C --no-commit-id cf5d9e1 |acut -f 4 | git > > cat-file --batch-check |acut -f 3|asum > > 45175575 > > 45MB

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 04:48:36PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > b) git archive become easily huge just because of such changes > > > > Do frequent commits of .gmo files significantly increase git archive? > > I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On 08/30/2017 04:32 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings >>> were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations. >>> Then

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > b) git archive become easily huge just because of such changes > > Do frequent commits of .gmo files significantly increase git archive? I did not make any stats, cherrypicking single commit (likely close to worst-case) gives me uncompressed 45 megs in blobs: $ git

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings > > were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations. > > Then the translator returns the po file, and the po and

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 > > > Ubuntu 'lyx2.3pre' packages are now available on the Development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily The

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I think I have a fundamental misunderstanding. I thought that strings > were supposed to be remerged before asking translators for translations. > Then the translator returns the po file, and the po and the > corresponding gmo files are committed. What is the purpose of

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On 08/28/2017 01:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 03:23:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 >> Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when >> releasing tarballs? >> (If not, can you

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 03:23:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 > > Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when releasing > tarballs? > (If not, can you share it there?) I just updated the wiki with the

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 Scott, did you put on lyx wiki the release steps you are using when releasing tarballs? (If not, can you share it there?) It seems strings were not properly remerged for beta. Pavel

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:41:44AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > Miscellaneous, I would say. > > I added it. Thanks, Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:38:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > > On 17/08/2017

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:33:51PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > An overview of the new features can

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:47:59AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > An overview of the new features can be found here: > > > > > >http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23 > > > >

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:06:06PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > An overview of the new features can be found here: > > > >http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23 > > AFAICR, the new shell-escape [+minted] support made it to the 2.3, but it's >

Re: LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

On 17/08/2017 20:25, Scott Kostyshak wrote: An overview of the new features can be found here: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX23 AFAICR, the new shell-escape [+minted] support made it to the 2.3, but it's not mentioned (yet). T.

LyX version 2.3.0 (beta 1)

Public release of LyX version 2.3.0beta1 We are proud to announce the first public beta of the new LyX 2.3 series. This pre-release is meant for testing and should not be used for serious work. For curious users who would like to test in order to help

Re: 2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

On 2016-02-11, Jürgen Lange wrote: > The PDF Producer changed from Xetex 0.2 in 2.1.4. to MikTex-xdvipdfmx > (20150315) in 2.2.0beta1. This is rather due to an MikTex update. xdvipdfmx is the part of XeTeX that transforms the intermediate format (XDVI) to PDF. Günter

Re: 2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

Jürgen Lange wrote: > Hello, > thank you very much for 2.2.0 beta 1. > Compiling one of my documents does not work anymore in 2.2.0 beta 1. The > format is PDF (XeTeX). > The error-message is: > Kann keinen Latex Befehl für das Zeichen ḫ (Code-Punkt 0x1e2b) finden. >

2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

Hello, thank you very much for 2.2.0 beta 1. Compiling one of my documents does not work anymore in 2.2.0 beta 1. The format is PDF (XeTeX). The error-message is: Kann keinen Latex Befehl für das Zeichen ḫ (Code-Punkt 0x1e2b) finden. Einige Zeichen Ihres Dokuments sind mit der gewählten

2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

The PDF Producer changed from Xetex 0.2 in 2.1.4. to MikTex-xdvipdfmx (20150315) in 2.2.0beta1.

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 1)

Dear all, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta1 Ubuntu binaries are now available on the Development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily . Install

Re: ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 1)

Dear all, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta1 > > Ubuntu binaries are now available on the Development PPA: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/daily . Install

Libertine support LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 1)

The latest version of libertine in MacTeX 2013 (updated with tlmgr) lacks the file libertineMono-type1.sty. I took libertineRoman-type1.sty, modified it accordingly, put it into my local tree, texhashed, reconfigured LyX and it works. Cool. el On 2013-08-01 10:40 , Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:

Libertine support LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 1)

The latest version of libertine in MacTeX 2013 (updated with tlmgr) lacks the file libertineMono-type1.sty. I took libertineRoman-type1.sty, modified it accordingly, put it into my local tree, texhashed, reconfigured LyX and it works. Cool. el On 2013-08-01 10:40 , Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote: >

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 1)

Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta1 We are proud to announce the first public beta release of the new LyX 2.1 series. LyX 2.1.0beta1 is the culmination of two and half years of hard work. This release is meant for testing before we actually

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.1.0 (beta 1)

Public release of LyX version 2.1.0beta1 We are proud to announce the first public beta release of the new LyX 2.1 series. LyX 2.1.0beta1 is the culmination of two and half years of hard work. This release is meant for testing before we actually

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or 2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository. IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or 2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or > 2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository. IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or 2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Dear all, It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please have a look at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; and help to complete the list of new features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to document the new features. Please don't add anything to the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Dear all, > > It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and > is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX > 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please have a look at "http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; and help to complete the list of new features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to document the new features. Please don't add anything to the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: >>> >>> The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? >>> Jerry >> >> I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new >>

LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Dear all, It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new strings and check their

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Next thing I would like to do

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Is there any urgency to do this

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead. Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1, they

LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Dear all, It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being > prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new strings and check their

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being > > prepared for LyX2.1) > > I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. > > Next thing I would

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being > > prepared for LyX2.1) > > I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. > Is there any urgency to

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know > > the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead. > > > Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have > new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1,

win installer for 2.0.0 beta 1 ??

Dear Lyx-developers, would you please prepare a windows installer for the new beta release 2.0.0 beta 2. I have no clue, if it is a lot of work to do this? Maybe it is the normal workflow, to prepare for linux and after 3 weeks have finished for windows? Or du you just have to push the green

Re: win installer for 2.0.0 beta 1 ??

go2tob...@gmx.de wrote: Maybe it is the normal workflow, to prepare for linux and after 3 weeks have finished for windows? Or du you just have to push the green button ? :-) the guys who are preparing installers are busy elsewhere outside lyx project. so unless you want to step in for

win installer for 2.0.0 beta 1 ??

would you please prepare a windows installer for the new beta release 2.0.0 beta 2. I'm wondering that people are so curious to test each and every brand-new development release immediately. Anyway, here it is: http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117release_id=18138

win installer for 2.0.0 beta 1 ??

Dear Lyx-developers, would you please prepare a windows installer for the new beta release 2.0.0 beta 2. I have no clue, if it is a lot of work to do this? Maybe it is the normal workflow, to prepare for linux and after 3 weeks have finished for windows? Or du you just have to push the green

Re: win installer for 2.0.0 beta 1 ??

go2tob...@gmx.de wrote: > Maybe it is the normal workflow, to prepare for linux and after 3 weeks > have finished for windows? Or du you just have to push the green button > ? :-) the guys who are preparing installers are busy elsewhere outside lyx project. so unless you want to step in for

win installer for 2.0.0 beta 1 ??

> would you please prepare a windows installer for the new beta release > 2.0.0 beta 2. I'm wondering that people are so curious to test each and every brand-new development release immediately. Anyway, here it is: http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117_id=18138

Autosave not working in Beta-1

Since the introduction of threaded export, the autosave function didn't work anymore. I fixed this in r36324-r36328. Vincent

Autosave not working in Beta-1

Since the introduction of threaded export, the autosave function didn't work anymore. I fixed this in r36324-r36328. Vincent

compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment violation. It was trying to read the error message when I noticed that the computer was hung. I reset it and now, during the starting, shows an error

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:15:39 -0800 (PST) Marcelo == Marcelo Acuña mv...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: Marcelo This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. Marcelo During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of Marcelo error: segment violation. It was trying to read

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

Marcelo Acu?a wrote: This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment violation. the only case i have seen such strange messages during compilation of anything was when my memory chipset got subverted

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

Am 15.11.2010 um 13:20 schrieb Gour: On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:15:39 -0800 (PST) Marcelo == Marcelo Acuña mv...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: Marcelo This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. Marcelo During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of Marcelo error

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux (solved)

During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment violation. the only case i have seen such strange messages during compilation of anything was when my memory chipset got subverted. so maybe time to run memory check tests... the only other way i'm aware how

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux (solved)

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) Marcelo == Marcelo Acuña mv...@yahoo.com.ar wrote: Marcelo My excuses by the false alarm. I am very ashamed for that reason. No problem. It happens to everyone...we are just curios what has happened with your cat? ;) Sincerely, Gour -- Gour |

compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment violation. It was trying to read the error message when I noticed that the computer was hung. I reset it and now, during the starting, shows an error

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:15:39 -0800 (PST) >>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña <mv...@yahoo.com.ar> wrote: Marcelo> This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. Marcelo> During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of Marcelo&

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

Marcelo Acu?a wrote: > This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. > During the course of the compilation it appeared a message of error: segment > violation. the only case i have seen such strange messages during compilation of anything was when my memory ch

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux

Am 15.11.2010 um 13:20 schrieb Gour: > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:15:39 -0800 (PST) >>>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña <mv...@yahoo.com.ar> wrote: > > Marcelo> This morning I configured lyx beta 1 and start the compilation. > Marcelo> Dur

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux (solved)

> > During the course of the compilation it appeared a >> message of error: segment violation. > the only case i have seen such strange messages during > compilation of anything was > when my memory chipset got subverted. so maybe time to run > memory check tests... > > the only other way i'm

Re: compilation of lyx 2 beta 1 destroyed my linux (solved)

On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:27:12 -0800 (PST) >> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Acuña wrote: Marcelo> My excuses by the false alarm. I am very ashamed for that reason. No problem. It happens to everyone...we are just curios what has happened with your cat? ;) Sincerely, Gour --

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 1)

Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 1) == We are pleased to announce the first public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. Development moved to the beta phase which basically means we will no more include new features and focus on polishing the current ones. We

Re: instructions for upgrade from LyX 1.6.7 to 2.0 beta 1?

Am 11.11.2010 um 07:42 schrieb Justin Wood: Hi gang. As LyX 2.0 beta 1 is now released, I thought I'd make the switch over (OS X 10.6). Hi Justin, good to have brave users who are going to test beta release of LyX 2.0. But it's beta and not clear exactly when the release will happen. So I

ANNOUNCE: LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 1)

Pre-release of LyX version 2.0.0 (beta 1) == We are pleased to announce the first public pre-release of LyX 2.0.0. Development moved to the beta phase which basically means we will no more include new features and focus on polishing the current ones. We

Re: instructions for upgrade from LyX 1.6.7 to 2.0 beta 1?

Am 11.11.2010 um 07:42 schrieb Justin Wood: > Hi gang. As LyX 2.0 beta 1 is now released, I thought I'd make the switch > over (OS X 10.6). Hi Justin, good to have brave users who are going to test beta release of LyX 2.0. But it's beta and not clear exactly when the release will happen

Re: Request to test beta 1

On Saturday 31 May 2008 02:35:36 Bennett Helm wrote: This works for me. Thanks. Should we create the Mac binaries off of this? (The splash screen reads 1.6.0svn.) If that is the case them lets us wait until Monday where I will tag a new beta2 and where this problem is fixed. OK? Bennett

Re: Custom compiler flags not used for LinkBack [Was: Request to test beta 1]

Konrad Hofbauer wrote: For cross-compiling PPC-Binaries on an Intel-Mac (which Bennett and me need to do to create universal binaries for release), I need to set export CFLAGS=-arch ppc export CXXFLAGS=-arch ppc export LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS -arch ppc and they automatically get passed to g++,

Re: Request to test beta 1

On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:00 AM, José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 31 May 2008 02:35:36 Bennett Helm wrote: This works for me. Thanks. Should we create the Mac binaries off of this? (The splash screen reads 1.6.0svn.) If that is the case them lets us wait until Monday

Re: Request to test beta 1

José Matos wrote: Hi, temporarily I have placed the source for lyx-1.6.0beta1 in http://lyx.org/~jamatos/lyx-1.6/ If it goes well we could/should announce it publically and then it would be nice to have packages to test this under different scenarios. If the sources have some unseen

  1   2   3   4   >