Steve, how do you see future development of xforms panning out? At present it
seems to be stagnating somewhat. That may seem churlish, given that you only
released 1.0final over the weekend, but it isn't meant to be. I'm merely
pointing out the reality of a release that occurred 6 months after
Steve, how do you see future development of xforms panning out? At
present it seems to be stagnating somewhat. That may seem churlish,
given that you only released 1.0final over the weekend, but it isn't
meant to be. I'm merely pointing out the reality of a release that
occurred 6 months
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:51 pm, Steve Lamont wrote:
It may be that I am not the right person for this job, inasmuch as my
professional responsibilities continue to evolve and my collaborative
projects continue to proliferate.
Nah!
I am chastened.
Don't be. None of this was meant as a
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Steve Lamont wrote:
It may be that I am not the right person for this job, inasmuch as my
professional responsibilities continue to evolve and my collaborative
projects continue to proliferate.
If it is the group's consensus that someone else should assume these
I cannot see it -- I am really happy with your efforts, Steve.
Please, folks. I wasn't fishing for pats on the back (or kicks in the
tush, for that matter :-)), just thinking out loud.
spl
Steve, how do you see future development of xforms panning out? At present it
seems to be stagnating somewhat. That may seem churlish, given that you only
released 1.0final over the weekend, but it isn't meant to be. I'm merely
pointing out the reality of a release that occurred 6 months after
> Steve, how do you see future development of xforms panning out? At
> present it seems to be stagnating somewhat. That may seem churlish,
> given that you only released 1.0final over the weekend, but it isn't
> meant to be. I'm merely pointing out the reality of a release that
> occurred 6 months
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 2:51 pm, Steve Lamont wrote:
> It may be that I am not the right person for this job, inasmuch as my
> professional responsibilities continue to evolve and my collaborative
> projects continue to proliferate.
Nah!
> I am chastened.
Don't be. None of this was meant as
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Steve Lamont wrote:
> It may be that I am not the right person for this job, inasmuch as my
> professional responsibilities continue to evolve and my collaborative
> projects continue to proliferate.
>
> If it is the group's consensus that someone else should assume these
>
> I cannot see it -- I am really happy with your efforts, Steve.
Please, folks. I wasn't fishing for pats on the back (or kicks in the
tush, for that matter :-)), just thinking out loud.
spl
10 matches
Mail list logo
