On Monday, 3 January 2022 18.32.14 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> In any case I found other cases where the code is wrong (like the BOM
> removal that does not work) and that it does not give an error although it
> is wrong.
For future reference this is an issue that happens silently. In this
On Monday, 3 January 2022 16.02.51 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:16:47PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > If you want I can take care of that, in 2.4, and see if there are cases
> > where the conversion is missing.
>
> Please do, I suffer from ophidiophobia.
You keep
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:16:47PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> If you want I can take care of that, in 2.4, and see if there are cases where
> the conversion is missing.
Please do, I suffer from ophidiophobia.
> @Riki: is it possible to have a layout file such that the encoding is not
>
On Monday, 3 January 2022 14.55.53 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> If I get that right the part of the "..." -> b"..." should be committed to
> 2.4?
>
> Pavel
Good point. Yes, it should (I thought that it already was) specially in order
to be consistent with all the other code that already does that.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 02:04:20PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Looking into further detail I would easily that the first part of the patch
> is
> correct (change "..." to b"...").
>
> The second part where it changes sys.stdin to sys.stdin.buffer is probably
> incorrect:
>
> The similar
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 14.52.29 WET Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jose,
>
> are the proposed changes sensible?
> I remember there were flowing similar patches to python codebase before.
The changes are reasonable for python 3.
I am not so sure about python 2 (because we support it) although it
Jose,
are the proposed changes sensible?
I remember there were flowing similar patches to python codebase before.
Pavel
- Forwarded message from "Leo L. Schwab" -
From: "Leo L. Schwab"
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: Bug#1002821: lyx-common: String/Bytes Problem in
