Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread cmiramon
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The few times I tried cachegrind, it was making lyx so slow that any testing concerning the GUI was too difficult to do. How do KDE people do it? Is there some documentation somewhere? It seems to me that oprofile is much faster. It is slow but it works.

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
cmiramon == cmiramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cmiramon I have compiled yesterday svn lyx and ran it through cmiramon cachegrind (start lyx, load tutorial, page down twice exit). Did you compile lyx with --disable-stdlib-debug and --disable-assertions? It seems to me that you did not. This

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread Charles de Miramon
cmiramon == cmiramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cmiramon I have compiled yesterday svn lyx and ran it through cmiramon cachegrind (start lyx, load tutorial, page down twice exit). Did you compile lyx with --disable-stdlib-debug and --disable-assertions? It seems to me that you did not.

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Charles == Charles de Miramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Charles Just a teaser. KCachegrind is a funny application with a lot Charles of buttons you can push. It is really a teaser! The kcachegrind window is hidden. JMarc

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread cmiramon
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The few times I tried cachegrind, it was making lyx so slow that any > testing concerning the GUI was too difficult to do. How do KDE people > do it? Is there some documentation somewhere? > > It seems to me that oprofile is much faster. > It is slow but it

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "cmiramon" == cmiramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cmiramon> I have compiled yesterday svn lyx and ran it through cmiramon> cachegrind (start lyx, load tutorial, page down twice exit). Did you compile lyx with --disable-stdlib-debug and --disable-assertions? It seems to me that you did

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread Charles de Miramon
>> "cmiramon" == cmiramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > cmiramon> I have compiled yesterday svn lyx and ran it through > cmiramon> cachegrind (start lyx, load tutorial, page down twice exit). > > Did you compile lyx with --disable-stdlib-debug and --disable-assertions? > > It seems to me

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Charles" == Charles de Miramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Charles> Just a teaser. KCachegrind is a funny application with a lot Charles> of buttons you can push. It is really a teaser! The kcachegrind window is hidden. JMarc

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
cmiramon == cmiramon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cmiramon Hello, I'm reading arguments to and fro about the fastness cmiramon of the new Qt4 frontend. cmiramon Just a question. Has someone tried Valgrind / Cachegrind / cmiramon KCachegrind on the Qt4 frontend and the last working Qt3 cmiramon

Re: KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "cmiramon" == cmiramon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cmiramon> Hello, I'm reading arguments to and fro about the fastness cmiramon> of the new Qt4 frontend. cmiramon> Just a question. Has someone tried Valgrind / Cachegrind / cmiramon> KCachegrind on the Qt4 frontend and the last working

KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-24 Thread cmiramon
Hello, I'm reading arguments to and fro about the fastness of the new Qt4 frontend. Just a question. Has someone tried Valgrind / Cachegrind / KCachegrind on the Qt4 frontend and the last working Qt3 frontend after the unicode transition, and a 1.4 version ? At least, it would give more

KCachegrind and LyX

2006-10-24 Thread cmiramon
Hello, I'm reading arguments to and fro about the fastness of the new Qt4 frontend. Just a question. Has someone tried Valgrind / Cachegrind / KCachegrind on the Qt4 frontend and the last working Qt3 frontend after the unicode transition, and a 1.4 version ? At least, it would give more