Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dekel Jean-Marc, how about using istream_iterator instead of Dekel ostringstream in the 1.1.6 branch, and then release 1.1.6fix3 ? That is probably a good idea. Could you provide a patch to me? JMarc

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> Jean-Marc, how about using istream_iterator instead of Dekel> ostringstream in the 1.1.6 branch, and then release 1.1.6fix3 ? That is probably a good idea. Could you provide a patch to me? JMarc

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread G.Angely
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G == G Angely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G Are there indications that the Debian compiler and/or environment G is faulty. Maybe another package (LaTeX?). As far as we know, the problem is in the sstream of libstdc++-2.10. When lyx-1.1.6fix2 is compiled under

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:24:30PM +0200, G.Angely wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G == G Angely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G Are there indications that the Debian compiler and/or environment G is faulty. Maybe another package (LaTeX?). As far as we know, the problem is in the

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | PS: We are still using ostringstream in many places. Is this a problem ? | In particular, the code of GetFileContents in support/filetools.C seems | problematic as it works exactly like the old lyx::sum. Let me have a look at that... -- Lgb

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | PS: We are still using ostringstream in many places. Is this a | problem ? No, not really. | In particular, the code of GetFileContents in support/filetools.C seems | problematic as it works exactly like the old lyx::sum. I don't want to change this.

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread G.Angely
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "G" == G Angely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > G> Are there indications that the Debian compiler and/or environment > G> is faulty. Maybe another package (LaTeX?). > > As far as we know, the problem is in the sstream of libstdc++-2.10. When lyx-1.1.6fix2 is

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:24:30PM +0200, G.Angely wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "G" == G Angely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > G> Are there indications that the Debian compiler and/or environment > > G> is faulty. Maybe another package (LaTeX?). > > > > As far as we know,

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | PS: We are still using ostringstream in many places. Is this a problem ? | In particular, the code of GetFileContents in support/filetools.C seems | problematic as it works exactly like the old lyx::sum. Let me have a look at that... -- Lgb

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | PS: We are still using ostringstream in many places. Is this a | problem ? No, not really. | In particular, the code of GetFileContents in support/filetools.C seems | problematic as it works exactly like the old lyx::sum. I don't want to change this.

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
G == G Angely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G Are there indications that the Debian compiler and/or environment G is faulty. Maybe another package (LaTeX?). As far as we know, the problem is in the sstream of libstdc++-2.10. JMarc

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-06-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "G" == G Angely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> Are there indications that the Debian compiler and/or environment G> is faulty. Maybe another package (LaTeX?). As far as we know, the problem is in the sstream of libstdc++-2.10. JMarc

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-05-31 Thread G.Angely
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: G == G Angely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time G comparing to 1.15fix2: This problem has been reported under linux by debian users. Are you one of them? JMarc Right: lyx 1.1.6fix2 was compiled on

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-05-31 Thread G.Angely
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "G" == G Angely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > G> Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time > G> comparing to 1.15fix2: > > This problem has been reported under linux by debian users. Are you > one of them? > > JMarc Right: lyx

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-05-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
G == G Angely [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time G comparing to 1.15fix2: This problem has been reported under linux by debian users. Are you one of them? JMarc

Re: Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-05-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "G" == G Angely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: G> Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time G> comparing to 1.15fix2: This problem has been reported under linux by debian users. Are you one of them? JMarc

Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-05-27 Thread G.Angely
Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time comparing to 1.15fix2: - viewing the LyX tutorial document takes at first some minutes, comparing to an half one for 1.1.5fix2 - viewing the same document later, takes 45 s with 1.1.6fix2 and 5 s with 1.1.5fix2 - viewing the User

Lyx 1.1.6fix2: long time to get ps view

2001-05-27 Thread G.Angely
Under LyX 1.1.6fix2, viewing as Postscript takes a very long time comparing to 1.15fix2: - viewing the "LyX tutorial" document takes at first some minutes, comparing to an half one for 1.1.5fix2 - viewing the same document later, takes 45 s with 1.1.6fix2 and 5 s with 1.1.5fix2 - viewing the