Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
| Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
|
| OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
|
| Yes, of course.
|
| Done.
Good. I will create the branch later
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
Yes, of course.
Done.
- Martin
Not sure if you need
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
| > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
| >
| > > OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
| >
| > Yes, of course.
|
| Done.
Good. I will create the
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> >
> > > OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
> >
> > Yes, of course.
>
> Done.
>
> - Martin
>
Not
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:55 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
| Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
| I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0. This is a major
| problem, and LCursor::paste() is
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:55 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Georg Baum wrote:
| | Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
| | I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
do you think this is enough testing for 1.4.0?
I also did some more testing, and found no problem except one that also
exists without the patch: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2331
I would say that the patch is tested enough for 1.4.0.
Lars, do you agree?
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:02 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:55 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Georg Baum wrote:
| | Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:19 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:02 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
...but I may soon have a patch for the above problem...
Being
Only, with 2), and even with 1) \textrm, it is possible to
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we can get some more people to test this and also test other
operations to try to make sure that no regressions are introcuced,
then if all agree we can have this too for 1.4.0.
Martin Did the following tests.
What bothers me with this
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 10:55 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we can get some more people to test this and also test other
operations to try to make sure that no regressions are introcuced,
then if all agree we can have this too for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What bothers me with this patch is that I never really understood what
the semantics of niceInsert are (wrt other inserts). So how can we be
sure that the patch does not break something else?
We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not already
Martin Vermeer wrote:
How relevant is the semantics of non-working code?
It is very important;-)
LCursor::paste(data) takes a string, and calls LFUN_PASTE with that
string as the data to be pasted. Correct syntax would be to call with
the buffer number to be pasted from. It cannot and does
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:19 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
How relevant is the semantics of non-working code?
It is very important;-)
LCursor::paste(data) takes a string, and calls LFUN_PASTE with that
string as the data to be pasted. Correct syntax would be to call
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not
Georg already broken before Michael did fix the insert delimiters
Georg around selection bug, because the part of the patch that
Georg touches niceInsert() simply reverts that fix.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Georg We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not
| Georg already broken before Michael did fix the insert delimiters
| Georg around selection bug, because the part of the patch
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:30:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Georg What makes me
| Georg also sure that this patch is correct is the fact that
| Georg niceInsert() is used in 1.3
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
Yes, of course.
Georg
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 16:15 schrieb Georg Baum:
We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not already
broken
before Michael did fix the insert delimiters around selection bug,
Of course that was Martin.
Sorry,
Georg
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
Yes, of course.
Done.
- Martin
pgpF6emm1yB6w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:07:44AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M? Typing \mathbbspaceR
gives the expected result to me.
Andre That this space is rquired is also a regression and I do not
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If we can get some more people to test this and also test other
operations to try to make sure that no regressions are introcuced,
then if all agree we can have this
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:55 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Georg Baum wrote:
> | > Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
> | > I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0. This is a major
> | > problem, and
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:55 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Georg Baum wrote:
| > | > Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
| > | > I agree with Joost that it should
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> do you think this is enough testing for 1.4.0?
I also did some more testing, and found no problem except one that also
exists without the patch: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2331
I would say that the patch is tested enough for 1.4.0.
Lars, do you agree?
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:02 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 14:55 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Georg Baum wrote:
> | > | > Fortunately this is easy to
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:19 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 13:02 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> ...but I may soon have a patch for the above problem...
>
Being
"Only, with 2), and even with 1) \textrm, it is
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If we can get some more people to test this and also test other
>> operations to try to make sure that no regressions are introcuced,
>> then if all agree we can have this too for 1.4.0.
Martin> Did the following tests.
What
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 10:55 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> If we can get some more people to test this and also test other
> >> operations to try to make sure that no regressions are introcuced,
> >> then if all agree we
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What bothers me with this patch is that I never really understood what
> the semantics of niceInsert are (wrt other inserts). So how can we be
> sure that the patch does not break something else?
We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not already
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> How relevant is the semantics of non-working code?
It is very important;-)
> LCursor::paste(data) takes a string, and calls LFUN_PASTE with that
> string as the data to be pasted. Correct syntax would be to call with
> the buffer number to be pasted from. It cannot and
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:19 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > How relevant is the semantics of non-working code?
>
> It is very important;-)
>
> > LCursor::paste(data) takes a string, and calls LFUN_PASTE with that
> > string as the data to be pasted. Correct syntax would
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not
Georg> already broken before Michael did fix the "insert delimiters
Georg> around selection" bug, because the part of the patch that
Georg> touches niceInsert() simply
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Georg> We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not
| Georg> already broken before Michael did fix the "insert delimiters
| Georg> around selection" bug, because the part
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:30:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Georg> What makes me
> | Georg> also sure that this patch is correct is the fact that
> | Georg>
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
Yes, of course.
Georg
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 16:15 schrieb Georg Baum:
> We can be sure that it does not break anything that was not already
broken
> before Michael did fix the "insert delimiters around selection" bug,
Of course that was Martin.
Sorry,
Georg
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:43:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 18:44 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
>
> > OK if I commit this? It's your fix as much as mine
>
> Yes, of course.
Done.
- Martin
pgpF6emm1yB6w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:07:44AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M? Typing \mathbbR
> >> gives the expected result to me.
>
> Andre> That this space is rquired is also a regression and
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> If we can get some more people to test this and also test other
> >> operations to try to make sure that no regressions are introcuced,
> >> then if all
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M? Typing \mathbbspaceR
gives the expected result to me.
Andre That this space is rquired is also a regression and I do not
Andre really remember leaving mathed in this state. Could this be
Andre related
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 20:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
Attached the best I can come up with for now. Working are:
1) fonts from the panel around selection
2) decorations from the panel over/under selection
3) compound symbols from the panel, type \mathbb R, without sel
4) same with sel:
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 10:29 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 20:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
Attached the best I can come up with for now. Working are:
1) fonts from the panel around selection
2) decorations from the panel over/under selection
3) compound symbols
Georg Baum wrote:
Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0. This is a major problem,
and LCursor::paste() is so utterly broken that every replacement that
works at least in one single case is better.
I have tested this patch
Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
| Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
| I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0. This is a major
| problem, and LCursor::paste() is so utterly broken that every
| replacement that works at least in
Georg Baum wrote:
The attached nearly untested patch fixes math-insert (bug 2315). 'fixes'
means revert to 1.3 behaviour: Require $...$ (or any other valid formula
delimiters). If no delimiters are present, create a black 'pseudo
formula'.
Please test.
Works for me.
Jürgen
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M? Typing \mathbbR
>> gives the expected result to me.
Andre> That this space is rquired is also a regression and I do not
Andre> really remember leaving mathed in this state. Could this be
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 20:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> Attached the best I can come up with for now. Working are:
>
> 1) fonts from the panel around selection
> 2) decorations from the panel over/under selection
> 3) compound symbols from the panel, type \mathbb R, without sel
> 4) same
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 10:29 +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 20:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> > Attached the best I can come up with for now. Working are:
> >
> > 1) fonts from the panel around selection
> > 2) decorations from the panel over/under selection
> > 3) compound
Georg Baum wrote:
Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0. This is a major problem,
and LCursor::paste() is so utterly broken that every replacement that
works at least in one single case is better.
I have tested this patch
Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
| > Fortunately this is easy to fix, see the attached patch. (...)
| > I agree with Joost that it should be in 1.4.0. This is a major
| > problem, and LCursor::paste() is so utterly broken that every
| > replacement that works at least
Georg Baum wrote:
> The attached nearly untested patch fixes math-insert (bug 2315). 'fixes'
> means revert to 1.3 behaviour: Require $...$ (or any other valid formula
> delimiters). If no delimiters are present, create a black 'pseudo
> formula'.
> Please test.
Works for me.
Jürgen
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:19:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
For blackboard bold R (real numbers) we have \\mathbb R.
Why doesn't it try \mathbb{R} or such? Shouldn't that be parsed
better?
Perhaps... I tried that. It (1)
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 18:19 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
First of all, the bug is unrelated to text-math conversion. You should
look at ControlMath.C. There, the command texts associated with each
symbol in the math symbol panels, executed when clicking on them, are
defined.
For
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 16:36 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
Joost Verburg wrote:
Typing the LaTeX command manually also gives weird behavior and not
the
expected result.
you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M?
Typing \mathbbspaceR gives the expected result to me.
The reason for
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 19:39 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:36:58PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
math-insert is broken in general :-(
Could this be related to somebody insisting on (a) doing clever things
in text-math conversation (i.e. adding 'missing' '$')
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 03:24:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 18:19 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
...
For blackboard bold R (real numbers) we have \\mathbb R.
which is BTW valid TeX syntax.
When you inspect the code handling this, more precisely
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 17:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
Yes... but now insertion of a decoration around selected math text
fails. The problem which this patch originally tried to fix.
Of course. The patch was only meant to show where the problem is, it was
by no means a finished fix.
The
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 17:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
...
The assumption here appears to be that the argument to give to the
LFUN_PASTE call is the _text_ to be pasted into the doc. Checking the
places where LFUN_PASTE is
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 17:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
Yes... but now insertion of a decoration around selected math text
fails. The problem which this patch originally tried to fix.
Of course. The patch was only meant to show
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Attached the best I can come up with for now. (...)
I propose this as the patch for 1.4.1 (not 1.4.0 I think; it's cosmetic
and there's a workaround).
But what about only the math panel issue? I think there should be at
least a patch to fix that in 1.4.0 since it is a
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:45:53PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:19:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > For blackboard bold R (real numbers) we have "\\mathbb R".
>
> Why doesn't it try \mathbb{R} or such? Shouldn't that be parsed
> better?
Perhaps... I tried that.
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 18:19 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> First of all, the bug is unrelated to text->math conversion. You should
> look at ControlMath.C. There, the command texts associated with each
> symbol in the math symbol panels, executed when clicking on them, are
> defined.
>
> For
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 16:36 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > Typing the LaTeX command manually also gives weird behavior and not
the
> > expected result.
>
> you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M?
> Typing \mathbbR gives the expected result to me.
The reason
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 19:39 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:36:58PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > math-insert is broken in general :-(
>
> Could this be related to somebody insisting on (a) doing clever things
> in text->math conversation (i.e. adding 'missing'
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 03:24:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 18:19 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
...
> > For blackboard bold R (real numbers) we have "\\mathbb R".
>
> which is BTW valid TeX syntax.
>
> > When you inspect the code handling this, more precisely
> >
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 17:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> Yes... but now insertion of a decoration "around" selected math text
> fails. The problem which this patch originally tried to fix.
Of course. The patch was only meant to show where the problem is, it was
by no means a finished fix.
>
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 17:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
...
> > The assumption here appears to be that the argument to give to the
> > LFUN_PASTE call is the _text_ to be pasted into the doc. Checking the
> > places where
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 07:25:51PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2006 17:53 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> > Yes... but now insertion of a decoration "around" selected math text
> > fails. The problem which this patch originally tried to fix.
>
> Of course. The patch was only
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Attached the best I can come up with for now. (...)
I propose this as the patch for 1.4.1 (not 1.4.0 I think; it's cosmetic
and there's a workaround).
But what about only the math panel issue? I think there should be at
least a patch to fix that in 1.4.0 since it is a
Hello,
Again testing the latest development version of LyX 1.4 on Windows, I
have another problem.
I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R: \mathbb{R}.
Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at
Joost Verburg wrote:
I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R:
\mathbb{R}.
Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at the saved LyX file it
contains only an empty mathbb command: \mathbb{}. When I
Daniel Watkins wrote:
Within the maths environment of LyX, typing any of the above commands (in
this case \mathbb) creates an inset of that type (i.e. a box within which
everything typed will be in, for example, \mathbb). You then have to place
the cursor within this inset to use the font
Joost Verburg wrote:
I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R: \mathbb{R}.
Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at the saved LyX file it
contains only an empty mathbb command: \mathbb{}. When I
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M?
Typing \mathbbspaceR gives the expected result to me.
Jürgen
The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
instead of the
Also sprach Joost Verburg:
The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
instead of the symbol.
I know, I can reproduce that. I just wanted to point out that the bug is IMHO
the same as the one for
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:28:03PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
Daniel Watkins wrote:
Within the maths environment of LyX, typing any of the above commands (in
this case \mathbb) creates an inset of that type (i.e. a box within which
everything typed will be in, for example, \mathbb). You then
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
instead of the symbol.
I know, I can reproduce that. I just wanted to point out that the bug is IMHO
the same as the one
Also sprach Joost Verburg:
This is bad. I guess I found another bug that didn't look very important
(textmath broken) but is quite major (math panel broken).
I think so, too.
Jürgen
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:47:31PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Also sprach Joost Verburg:
The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
instead of the symbol.
I know, I can reproduce
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:36:58PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Joost Verburg wrote:
I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R: \mathbb{R}.
Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at the
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:19:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
For blackboard bold R (real numbers) we have \\mathbb R.
Why doesn't it try \mathbb{R} or such? Shouldn't that be parsed
better?
[...]
Angus is marked as being to 'blame' for this part of the code, but that
proves little for
Hello,
Again testing the latest development version of LyX 1.4 on Windows, I
have another problem.
I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R: \mathbb{R}.
Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at
Joost Verburg wrote:
> I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
> document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R:
> \mathbb{R}.
>
> Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at the saved LyX file it
> contains only an empty mathbb command: \mathbb{}.
Daniel Watkins wrote:
Within the maths environment of LyX, typing any of the above commands (in
this case \mathbb) creates an inset of that type (i.e. a box within which
everything typed will be in, for example, \mathbb). You then have to place
the cursor within this inset to use the font
Joost Verburg wrote:
> I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
> document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R: \mathbb{R}.
>
> Nothing appears on the screen and when I look at the saved LyX file it
> contains only an empty mathbb command: \mathbb{}. When
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
you mean \mathbb{R}, then select and C-M?
Typing \mathbbR gives the expected result to me.
Jürgen
The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
instead of the symbol.
Also sprach Joost Verburg:
> The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
> of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
> instead of the symbol.
I know, I can reproduce that. I just wanted to point out that the bug is IMHO
the same as the one
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:28:03PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Daniel Watkins wrote:
> >Within the maths environment of LyX, typing any of the above commands (in
> >this case \mathbb) creates an inset of that type (i.e. a box within which
> >everything typed will be in, for example, \mathbb).
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
instead of the symbol.
I know, I can reproduce that. I just wanted to point out that the bug is IMHO
the same as the one
Also sprach Joost Verburg:
> This is bad. I guess I found another bug that didn't look very important
> (text>math broken) but is quite major (math panel broken).
I think so, too.
Jürgen
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:47:31PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Also sprach Joost Verburg:
> > The main problem is that the math panel doesn't work. Try to insert one
> > of the mathbb symbols using the math panel and you get an empty inset
> > instead of the symbol.
>
> I know, I can
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 04:36:58PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Joost Verburg wrote:
> > I'm trying to insert one of the matbb/mathcal/mathrm symbols in a
> > document using the math panel, for example the double-barred R: \mathbb{R}.
> >
> > Nothing appears on the screen and when I look
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 07:19:31PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> For blackboard bold R (real numbers) we have "\\mathbb R".
Why doesn't it try \mathbb{R} or such? Shouldn't that be parsed
better?
> [...]
> Angus is marked as being to 'blame' for this part of the code, but that
> proves little
94 matches
Mail list logo
