On Friday 17 January 2003 22:50, Martin Vermeer wrote:
Yes I think this sounds good. Something along these lines also in my
travel report from AGU infotech (Nov. 4, 2002). What I wrote was:
Having had a look at the way LyX produces XML output disclosed that
only two specific formats are
On Friday 17 January 2003 22:50, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Yes I think this sounds good. Something along these lines also in my
> "travel report" from AGU infotech (Nov. 4, 2002). What I wrote was:
>
> Having had a look at the way LyX produces XML output disclosed that
> only two specific formats
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:40, Andre Poenitz wrote:
[I changed this discussion to lyx-devel as it more apropriate.]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
After dealing with dealing with the visitor pattern.
Duedelue...
[José: Why?]
The question is: Why
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:07:46PM +, José Matos wrote:
that lyx2lyx was also a step in that direction, it was always my secret plan.
evil grin
Is there a consensus for this?
I have no objection.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:07:46PM +, José Matos spake thusly:
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:40, Andre Poenitz wrote:
[I changed this discussion to lyx-devel as it more apropriate.]
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
After dealing with dealing with
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:40, Andre Poenitz wrote:
[I changed this discussion to lyx-devel as it more apropriate.]
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
> > After dealing with dealing with the visitor pattern.
>
> Duedelue...
>
> > > [José: Why?]
>
> The question
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:07:46PM +, José Matos wrote:
> that lyx2lyx was also a step in that direction, it was always my secret plan.
>
>
> Is there a consensus for this?
I have no objection.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:07:46PM +, José Matos spake thusly:
> On Friday 17 January 2003 08:40, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> [I changed this discussion to lyx-devel as it more apropriate.]
>
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote:
> > > After dealing with