On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[snip]
mmm... I guess stringstream is not a win in this case.
or...
[snip]
Hmm if this were all the problems I give you my Go now Angus #:OP
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 14:44, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
+
+ // natbib.sty
+ if (natbib) {
+ string options([]);
+ if (params.use_numerical_citations)
+ options.insert(1, numbers);
+ else
+
On 25-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[snip]
>
> mmm... I guess stringstream is not a win in this case.
> or...
[snip]
Hmm if this were all the problems I give you my "Go" now Angus #:OP
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen
On Wednesday 25 July 2001 14:44, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> +
> + // natbib.sty
> + if (natbib) {
> + string options("[]");
> + if (params.use_numerical_citations)
> + options.insert(1, "numbers");
> + else
> +
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:35, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Tuesday 24 July 2001 01:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
|
| _That_ was a bit
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 12:35, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tuesday 24 July 2001 01:30, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
> | >
> | > _That_
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Well this is well known and as developer you should have looked at the
buglist
on SourceForge.net ;)
I still think that this was a sly way to get help, but anyway I've played
further.
#:O)
Well you won't believe it but I know since a long time the
On Thursday 19 July 2001 19:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
On Thursday, 19. July 2001 16:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
Angus
Thanks, I got it now ;-)
Looks great! A few comments, though:
- Citation Dialog size is much better now, but now a
On Friday, 20. July 2001 10:56, Angus Leeming wrote:
Could you fix this at your end please by playing with fdesign
form_citation.fd.
Hello Angus,
I've done this in fdesign and editor. Now it fits almost perfectly into
the poor man's 800x600 screen. I've attached the diff (no, I won't
call
On Friday 20 July 2001 13:54, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
On Friday, 20. July 2001 10:56, Angus Leeming wrote:
Could you fix this at your end please by playing with fdesign
form_citation.fd.
Hello Angus,
I've done this in fdesign and editor. Now it fits almost perfectly into
the poor
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Well this is well known and as developer you should have looked at the
> buglist
>> on SourceForge.net ;)
>
> I still think that this was a sly way to get help, but anyway I've played
> further.
#:O)
Well you won't believe it but I know since a long
On Thursday 19 July 2001 19:17, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> On Thursday, 19. July 2001 16:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
> > Angus
>
> Thanks, I got it now ;-)
>
> Looks great! A few comments, though:
>
> - Citation Dialog size is much better now,
On Friday, 20. July 2001 10:56, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Could you fix this at your end please by playing with fdesign
> form_citation.fd.
Hello Angus,
I've done this in fdesign and editor. Now it fits almost perfectly into
the "poor man's 800x600 screen". I've attached the diff (no, I won't
On Friday 20 July 2001 13:54, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> On Friday, 20. July 2001 10:56, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Could you fix this at your end please by playing with fdesign
> > form_citation.fd.
>
> Hello Angus,
>
> I've done this in fdesign and editor. Now it fits almost perfectly into
>
On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will change
the InsetERT to be inlined. What will NOT happen is that a inlined
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will change
the InsetERT to be
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
like a math inset would be fine. Maybe that is the model: an inlined ERT
box and a display ERT box, for longer chunks of LaTeX code.
That's exactly what we plan to do :)
Excellent! Why didn't you just say so :-)
On Wednesday, 18. July 2001 19:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination
with junk code should:
cvs checkout -r BRANCH_NATBIB lyx-devel
To get natbib support you'll need to set some parameters in the
Document-Extra tab
It should
On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:21, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
On Wednesday, 18. July 2001 19:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination
with junk code should:
cvs checkout -r BRANCH_NATBIB lyx-devel
To get natbib support you'll need to
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:21:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond the right
margin
of the workarea ?
Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
complaints about this automatic behaviour someone surely doesn't like!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond the right
margin
of the workarea ?
Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:08, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond
the right margin
of the workarea ?
Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
complaints about
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
complaints about this automatic behaviour someone surely doesn't like!
Well it seems like a good suggestion to me because it only affects the users
The only change to the above I
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:14, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
Think about the alternative - I add a lot of ert into the inset, so it is
drawn off
the side, and I can't even read it !
Surely we dont really have/want a choice in this circumstance.
Well we
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Road test to infinite redraws:
1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the width
Well this is well known and as developer you should have looked at the buglist
on SourceForge.net ;)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:43PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Road test to infinite redraws:
1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the width
Well this is well known and as developer
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:50, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
Road test to infinite redraws:
1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the
width
Well this is well known and as developer you should
On Thursday, 19. July 2001 16:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
Angus
Thanks, I got it now ;-)
Looks great! A few comments, though:
- Citation Dialog size is much better now, but now a little bit too
wide (about 1cm) for 800x600. Well, not really
On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
> This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
> the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will change
the InsetERT to be inlined. What will NOT happen is that a inlined
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
> > This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
> > the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
>
> I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we will change
> the InsetERT to
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > like a math inset would be fine. Maybe that is the model: an inlined ERT
> > box and a "display" ERT box, for longer chunks of LaTeX code.
>
> That's exactly what we plan to do :)
Excellent! Why didn't you just
On Wednesday, 18. July 2001 19:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination
> with junk code should:
>
> cvs checkout -r BRANCH_NATBIB lyx-devel
>
> To get natbib support you'll need to set some parameters in the
> Document->Extra tab
> It
On Thursday 19 July 2001 12:21, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18. July 2001 19:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination
> > with junk code should:
> >
> > cvs checkout -r BRANCH_NATBIB lyx-devel
> >
> > To get natbib support
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:21:51AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 18-Jul-2001 Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > This is not a stunning example of WYSIWYM. Please, please, (Lars?) change
> > the appearance back to the old behavior!!!
>
> I don't think this will happen. What will happen is that we
On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
> can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond the right
>margin
> of the workarea ?
Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
complaints about this automatic behaviour someone surely doesn't like!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:08:12PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond the right
>margin
> > of the workarea ?
>
> Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:08, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > can't you un-inline the ert inset automagically when it extends beyond
the right margin
> > of the workarea ?
>
> Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
> complaints
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Probably yes, but do I want to do this? Probably no, as then I would get
>> complaints about this automatic behaviour someone surely doesn't like!
>
> Well it seems like a good suggestion to me because it only affects the users
The only change to the
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:14, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > Think about the alternative - I add a lot of ert into the inset, so it is
drawn off
> > the side, and I can't even read it !
> >
> > Surely we dont really have/want a choice in this circumstance.
>
>
On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Road test to infinite redraws:
> 1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
> 2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the width
Well this is well known and as developer you should have looked at the buglist
on SourceForge.net ;)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 05:50:43PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Road test to infinite redraws:
> > 1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
> > 2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the width
>
> Well this is well known and
On Thursday 19 July 2001 16:50, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 19-Jul-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Road test to infinite redraws:
> > 1. Insert table, I row, 2 columns
> > 2. Type in first (leftmost) column until the table gets bigger than the
width
>
> Well this is well known and as developer
On Thursday, 19. July 2001 16:17, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Well, now it's in head so just update and play.
> Angus
Thanks, I got it now ;-)
Looks great! A few comments, though:
- Citation Dialog size is much better now, but now a little bit too
wide (about 1cm) for 800x600. Well, not really
Dear all,
I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
head. This is now your final chance to try it out before I completely screw
up the CVS head by rolling the branch back in ;-)
Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination with
junk
Oh, I forgot: An Edit-.Reconfigure probably wouldn't go amiss, although I'm
not sure that you need to do so...
Angus
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 18:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
Dear all,
I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
head. This is now your final
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
head. This is now your final chance to try it out before I completely screw
up the CVS head by rolling the branch back in ;-)
Woo hoo!!! Yes! Grabbed it, compiled it, already
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:49:45AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
That said, I want to gripe about the 666 insets, since this is the first
yes, everyone has this gripe. Lars and Juergen are doing things to get it nice
again, but with out re-introducing latex font mode (something that needs
John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:49:45AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
That said, I want to gripe about the 666 insets, since this is the first
yes, everyone has this gripe. Lars and Juergen are doing things to get it nice
again, but with out re-introducing latex font mode
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:05:42PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
And John, clicking on MathPanel Greek killed LyX for me also, so it is
probably not your xforms.
hmm. I've tried it against an xforms with /definitely/ the right glibc and still
get the problem too. I'll have to see what's going
Dear all,
I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
head. This is now your final chance to try it out before I completely screw
up the CVS head by rolling the branch back in ;-)
Those willing to help save the CVS head repository from contamination with
junk
Oh, I forgot: An Edit-.Reconfigure probably wouldn't go amiss, although I'm
not sure that you need to do so...
Angus
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 18:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
> head. This is now your final
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I believe that the NATBIB branch is now in a fit state to merge back into
> head. This is now your final chance to try it out before I completely screw
> up the CVS head by rolling the branch back in ;-)
Woo hoo!!! Yes! Grabbed it, compiled it, already
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:49:45AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
> That said, I want to gripe about the 666 insets, since this is the first
yes, everyone has this gripe. Lars and Juergen are doing things to get it nice
again, but with out re-introducing latex font mode (something that needs
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:49:45AM -0700, Mike Ressler wrote:
>
> > That said, I want to gripe about the 666 insets, since this is the first
>
> yes, everyone has this gripe. Lars and Juergen are doing things to get it nice
> again, but with out re-introducing latex font
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 05:05:42PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> And John, clicking on MathPanel Greek killed LyX for me also, so it is
> probably not your xforms.
hmm. I've tried it against an xforms with /definitely/ the right glibc and still
get the problem too. I'll have to see what's
56 matches
Mail list logo
