Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_
Am 27.11.2010 um 23:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>
>> Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>>
>>> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
Stephan
Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp
Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
I complicated an already existing code in order to be able
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
I
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:53 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
3. correct the absolute word count
Better?
I cannot tell. This code is very fragile (although better than in 1.6),
only
Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
3. correct the absolute word count
Better?
I cannot tell. This
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
3. correct the
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
3. correct the
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
Stephan
Index: src/frontends/qt4/GuiSpellchecker.cpp
Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
Does anybody have an explanation?
The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and works.
I complicated an already existing code in order to be able
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
>> on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
>> Does anybody have an explanation?
>> The attached patch would simplify on_replacePB_clicked a lot and
Am 27.11.2010 um 18:53 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27/11/2010 16:05, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> I cannot see why on_replacePB_clicked is so different from
>>> on_replaceAllPB_clicked.
>>> Does anybody have an explanation?
>>> The attached
Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The result is the next patch:
1. start check in updateView only once
2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
3. correct the absolute word count
Better?
I cannot tell. This code is very fragile (although better than in 1.6),
only
Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> The result is the next patch:
>> 1. start check in updateView only once
>> 2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
>> 3. correct the absolute word count
>>
>> Better?
>
> I
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> The result is the next patch:
>>> 1. start check in updateView only once
>>> 2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
>>> 3.
Am 27.11.2010 um 21:13 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 27.11.2010 um 19:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 27/11/2010 19:45, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>>> The result is the next patch:
>>> 1. start check in updateView only once
>>> 2. instead of count_ manipulation skip over replaced word
>>> 3.
18 matches
Mail list logo
