On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 16:36, Bennett Helm wrote:
> On May 11, 2005, at 6:55 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > It would be interesting to know how things have evolved since Martin's
> > latest patch.
>
> Here you go -- profile attached, done the same way as my previous
> report: tree view,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bennett> Thus, if I type "1234" quickly (but slowly enough to be sure
| Bennett> I'm typing them in that order!), I actually get "1342" or
| Bennett> "1432" in the document. Similarly, typing "The last time I
| Bennett> tested lyx" results in
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:58:47PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea how the input order reversal could come about?
> Again, are there any guarantees that the X queue gives events back in
> time order?
I believe there is not, but Qt should be dealing with that for us by
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Does anyone have an idea how the input order reversal could
Martin> come about? Again, are there any guarantees that the X queue
Martin> gives events back in time order?
I do not know many X apps that share this entertaining
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Oops, that's bad. Could this be due to calling sync_events twice during
| a cursor blink sequence? (both in showCursor and in hideCursor.) I did
| that to make LyX snappier ;-/
Hmm... this shouldn't be needed to make LyX snappier...
| Alternatively,
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:02, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Bennett> Thus, if I type "1234" quickly (but slowly enough to be sure
> | Bennett> I'm typing them in that order!), I actually get "1342" or
> | Bennett> "1432" in the document.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:02, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
How can events be reordered?
Precisely my question.
Did you check that your keyboard queue is really a queue, and not a stack?
Regards,
Asger
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:41, Asger Alstrup wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:02, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> >
> >>How can events be reordered?
> >
> > Precisely my question.
>
> Did you check that your keyboard queue is really a queue, and not a stack?
There is no
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Does anyone have an idea how the input order reversal could
Martin> come about? Again, are there any guarantees that the X queue
Martin> gives events back in time order?
Maybe something like:
1/ an event arrives
2/
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 17:33, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Oops, that's bad. Could this be due to calling sync_events twice during
> | a cursor blink sequence? (both in showCursor and in hideCursor.) I did
> | that to make LyX snappier ;-/
>
>
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:12:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> What came back was the original problem why sync_events was introduced:
> when scrolling fast in big documents (PageDown) the screen update
> doesn't keep up.
>
> - // You are not expected to understand this. This forces Qt
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:12:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
>> What came back was the original problem why sync_events was introduced:
>> when scrolling fast in big documents (PageDown) the screen update
>> doesn't keep up.
>>
>> - // You are not expected to
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> H. Rather than process all pending draw events fully, is it
Angus> sufficient to process the last draw event and discard the
Angus> earlier ones? Ie, we should be computing the metrics() on each
Angus> page-down, but we should
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
...
> What about using something like
>
> qApp->eventLoop()->processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInput);
>
> It looks to me as the right answer (do the drawing, not the use input)
>
> JMarc
Jean-Marc, you're a gem!
It works precisely
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> qApp->eventLoop()->processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInput);
When was this flag introduced to Qt?
john
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:12:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
>> What came back was the original problem why sync_events was introduced:
>> when scrolling fast in big documents (PageDown) the screen update
>> doesn't keep up.
>>
>> - // You are
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:28:02PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> H. Rather than process all pending draw events fully, is it sufficient
> to process the last draw event and discard the earlier ones? Ie, we should
> be computing the metrics() on each page-down, but we should draw() only if
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:57:11PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > qApp->eventLoop()->processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInput);
>
> When was this flag introduced to Qt?
Has to be said that I don't see any of the problems
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:57, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > qApp->eventLoop()->processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInput);
>
> When was this flag introduced to Qt?
3.1.
- Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:07:28PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Has to be said that I don't see any of the problems about drawing
> with current CVS...
But I do see the keypress re-ordering.
john
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:07:26PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > When was this flag introduced to Qt?
>
> 3.1.
OK, then we need to make that the minimum Qt version we support,
finally. Pity about Qt/Win Free or whatever it was but there's not much
we can do otherwise.
regards
john
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
qApp-> eventLoop()->processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInput);
John> When was this flag introduced to Qt?
Good question. It seems that it is Qt 3.1.
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> qApp->eventLoop()->processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInput);
>
> When was this flag introduced to Qt?
>
> john
There's a QEventLoop in Qt 3.1 (released November 13 2002).
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Patch attached. Please commit, this is your baby.
Feel free to do it, I am busy now. I guess you should guard it with
#if QTVERSION >= 0x030100
so that older qt will "only" suffer from drawing glitches.
JMarc
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:44:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Martin> Patch attached. Please commit, this is your baby.
>
> Feel free to do it, I am busy now. I guess you should guard it with
> #if QTVERSION >= 0x030100
> so that older qt will "only" suffer from drawing glitches.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:44:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Martin> Patch attached. Please commit, this is your baby.
>>
>> Feel free to do it, I am busy now. I guess you should guard it with
>> #if QTVERSION >= 0x030100
>> so that older
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 10:34:37PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I think Jean-Marc wants to eliminate processEvents altogether for older
> Qt. Then we will "only" suffer the drawing glitches that you objected so
> vehemently against. I think a reasonable Faustian deal against forcing
> people
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:44:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Patch attached. Please commit, this is your baby.
>
> Feel free to do it, I am busy now. I guess you should guard it with
> #if QTVERSION >= 0x030100
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Hi! I just remembered that this all started with enabling
Andreas font caching or not...
Andreas Here's what Qt/Aqua does in drawText(). If it does any
Andreas caching it doesn't help much...
No, what we do in LyX is font width caching,
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Am 07.04.2005 um 17:58 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas I also did some profiling and got the attached screenshot
Andreas when scrolling down using PageDown.
Do I really see 38% in
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Hi! I just remembered that this all started with enabling
Andreas> font caching or not...
Andreas> Here's what Qt/Aqua does in drawText(). If it does any
Andreas> caching it doesn't help much...
No, what we do in LyX is font
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Am 07.04.2005 um 17:58 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andreas> I also did some profiling and got the attached screenshot
Andreas> when scrolling down using PageDown.
On Apr 6, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Good. Did you compile LyX with debug information? I cannot see any
reference to any LyX function...
Oops. I guess that would help. (Second attempt below, this time
confined to LyX and with all samples =0.1.)
Do you know why there are 2
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett (Note that the version of Shark I'm using is slightly updated
Bennett from the version described on the webpage, so screenshots
Bennett there don't exactly match what I see.)
I found another article about shark 4:
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas I also did some profiling and got the attached screenshot
Andreas when scrolling down using PageDown.
Do I really see 38% in showCursor? This is very weird...
JMarc
Am 07.04.2005 um 17:58 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Andreas == Andreas Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas I also did some profiling and got the attached screenshot
Andreas when scrolling down using PageDown.
Do I really see 38% in showCursor? This is very weird...
Not really.
sync_events() is
On Apr 6, 2005, at 11:21 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Good. Did you compile LyX with debug information? I cannot see any
reference to any LyX function...
Oops. I guess that would help. (Second attempt below, this time
confined to LyX and with all samples >=0.1.)
Do you know why there are 2
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> (Note that the version of Shark I'm using is slightly updated
Bennett> from the version described on the webpage, so screenshots
Bennett> there don't exactly match what I see.)
I found another article about shark 4:
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> I also did some profiling and got the attached screenshot
Andreas> when scrolling down using PageDown.
Do I really see 38% in showCursor? This is very weird...
JMarc
Am 07.04.2005 um 17:58 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> I also did some profiling and got the attached screenshot
Andreas> when scrolling down using PageDown.
Do I really see 38% in showCursor? This is very weird...
Not really.
Here is my first attempt to profile LyX-140 on Mac -- without really
knowing what I'm doing or what language to use in describing it.
I quit all applications other than Shark and LyX-140, and ran a time
profile on all processes for 30 seconds (LyX represented 88.7% of the
total). During
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:05:05AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
I quit all applications other than Shark and LyX-140, and ran a time
profile on all processes for 30 seconds (LyX represented 88.7% of the
Can you do it just for LyX? The output doesn't seem to have anything
useful (and it's way
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennett I quit all applications other than Shark and LyX-140, and ran
Bennett a time profile on all processes for 30 seconds (LyX
Bennett represented 88.7% of the total). During that time, I typed
Bennett into a long-ish document in LyX.
Good.
Here is my first attempt to profile LyX-140 on Mac -- without really
knowing what I'm doing or what language to use in describing it.
I quit all applications other than Shark and LyX-140, and ran a time
profile on all processes for 30 seconds (LyX represented 88.7% of the
total). During
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:05:05AM -0400, Bennett Helm wrote:
> I quit all applications other than Shark and LyX-140, and ran a time
> profile on all processes for 30 seconds (LyX represented 88.7% of the
Can you do it just for LyX? The output doesn't seem to have anything
useful (and it's
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I quit all applications other than Shark and LyX-140, and ran
Bennett> a time profile on all processes for 30 seconds (LyX
Bennett> represented 88.7% of the total). During that time, I typed
Bennett> into a long-ish document in
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
