Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is the possibility to get the previous word automatically into the index inset. But I suspect there's a trick even for that if we go this way. The

Re: Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is the possibility to get the previous word automatically into the index inset. But I suspect there's a trick even for that if

Re: Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:19:55 +0200 Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is the possibility to get the previous

Re: Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:19:55 +0200 Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is the possibility to get the previous

Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is > the possibility to get the previous word automatically into the index > inset. But I suspect there's a trick even for that if we go this way. >

Re: Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Martin Vermeer wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is the possibility to get the previous word automatically into the index inset. But I suspect there's a trick even for that if

Re: Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:19:55 +0200 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is > >> the possibility to

Re: Question (Re: Index as flex inset)

2007-09-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:19:55 +0200 Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 > > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is > >> the possibility to