Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-02-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:48:39PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > And we don't even know what to say if some translator asks :) > > I'll ask on lyx-users. Thanks Juergen. I'll take care of layouttranslations later. Pavel --

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-02-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > And we don't even know what to say if some translator asks :) I'll ask on lyx-users. -- Jürgen -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-02-01 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:06:44PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > In any case the current situation in lib/layouttranslations will be > > more > > confusing now, because we provide Acknowledgment from AMS with most > >

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-02-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > In any case the current situation in lib/layouttranslations will be > more > confusing now, because we provide Acknowledgment from AMS with most > languages > explicitely using it in the sense of "credits" which is most likely >

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-31 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Le 31/01/2023 à 07:52, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 15:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: Yes, it's fine with me. Done. While doing it, it occurred to me that the acknowledgment strings in their different uses might need disambiguation. The theorem type

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-31 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:52:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > but I can't imagine the theorem type has that function. It is > more to acknowledge (and maybe critically challenge) an argument, > right? I admit I never saw it in some math paper (yet), but given that it's environment which

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-31 Thread Joel Kulesza
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:05 Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:26:31AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > > > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact > > > from the 1990s) has

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-31 Thread José Matos
On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 12:42 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > What I would expect from my students is consistency. > > Riki We can always dream. :-D -- José Abílio -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 15:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Yes, it's fine with me. Done. While doing it, it occurred to me that the acknowledgment strings in their different uses might need disambiguation. The theorem type "Acknowledgment" has not the same semantics than the

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-30 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/30/23 12:45, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 12:42 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: On 1/30/23 01:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 12:42 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > On 1/30/23 01:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > > > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in > > > fact > > > from the 1990s) has

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-30 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 1/30/23 01:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas with words like "colour" and "tyre" it has

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-30 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:26:31AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact > > from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas > > with words

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-29 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact > from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas > with words like "colour" and "tyre" it has "colour (US color)", "tyre > (US tire)". In

Re: Acknowledgment vs. Acknowledgement

2023-01-29 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 29/01/2023 11:37 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: In the AMS extended theorem modules, we define a theorem type "Acknowledgement". However, to my best knowledge, the US English spelling is acknowledgment (vs. British acknowledgement). I wonder whether this should be changed (and the Britisch