On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 03:48:39PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > And we don't even know what to say if some translator asks :)
>
> I'll ask on lyx-users.
Thanks Juergen.
I'll take care of layouttranslations later.
Pavel
--
Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> And we don't even know what to say if some translator asks :)
I'll ask on lyx-users.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:06:44PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > In any case the current situation in lib/layouttranslations will be
> > more
> > confusing now, because we provide Acknowledgment from AMS with most
> >
Am Dienstag, dem 31.01.2023 um 14:39 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> In any case the current situation in lib/layouttranslations will be
> more
> confusing now, because we provide Acknowledgment from AMS with most
> languages
> explicitely using it in the sense of "credits" which is most likely
>
Le 31/01/2023 à 07:52, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 15:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
Yes, it's fine with me.
Done.
While doing it, it occurred to me that the acknowledgment strings in
their different uses might need disambiguation.
The theorem type
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:52:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> but I can't imagine the theorem type has that function. It is
> more to acknowledge (and maybe critically challenge) an argument,
> right?
I admit I never saw it in some math paper (yet), but given that it's
environment which
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:05 Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:26:31AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> > > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact
> > > from the 1990s) has
On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 12:42 -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> What I would expect from my students is consistency.
>
> Riki
We can always dream. :-D
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 15:26 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> Yes, it's fine with me.
Done.
While doing it, it occurred to me that the acknowledgment strings in
their different uses might need disambiguation.
The theorem type "Acknowledgment" has not the same semantics than the
On 1/30/23 12:45, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 12:42 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
On 1/30/23 01:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in
fact
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 12:42 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> On 1/30/23 01:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> > > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in
> > > fact
> > > from the 1990s) has
On 1/30/23 01:26, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact
from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas
with words like "colour" and "tyre" it has
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:26:31AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> > Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact
> > from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas
> > with words
Am Montag, dem 30.01.2023 um 08:28 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe:
> Just to confuse matters, my "New Oxford English Dictionary" (in fact
> from the 1990s) has "acknowledgement (also acknowledgment)" whereas
> with words like "colour" and "tyre" it has "colour (US color)", "tyre
> (US tire)". In
On 29/01/2023 11:37 pm, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
In the AMS extended theorem modules, we define a theorem type
"Acknowledgement". However, to my best knowledge, the US English
spelling is acknowledgment (vs. British acknowledgement).
I wonder whether this should be changed (and the Britisch
15 matches
Mail list logo